Crowdsourcing Law Enforcement
from the first-10-callers-to-identify-this-fugitive... dept
In a move that seems calculated to evoke the film adaptation of 1984, the FBI has announced a plan to begin using some 150 Clear Channel digital billboards in major American cities to show national security alerts, information about recent crimes, and photographs of fugitive criminals and missing persons, all with real-time updates.A pilot billboard in Philadelphia has already helped to capture several wanted criminals, and a spokesman for the outdoor advertising industry suggests that these kinds of publicity tactics can be as useful at demoralizing criminals as they are at generating tips:
"What law enforcement tells us is it contributes to an environment where the criminal feels they have no where to go. A lot of times they end up just giving up."
In a way, the surprising thing is that law enforcement officials hadn't previously taken such visible steps to make use of the distributed eyes and ears of ordinary citizens. The problem, of course, is that publicity can also generate lots of time-consuming false leads. An advertisement currently ubiquitous on New York subways applauds the thousands of New Yorkers who phoned in reports of suspicious packages in the past year. But since we haven't heard reports of thousands of bombs recovered on the A train, it seems safe to surmise that the noise-to-signal ratio on such tips is quite high. As for national security alerts, our experience with color-coded national security warnings, and the attendant spectacle of panicked citizens mobbing Home Depot for plastic sheeting and duct tape, suggest that the Bureau might be well advised to exercise a bit of circumspection about those real-time updates.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: billboards, criminals, crowdsourcing, fbi
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Speaking of the collor coded list
Likewise for blue
Yellow means you're as likely to die from a terrorist attack as you are to win the lottery three years running, then get struck by a meteorite
Orange means that they want to scare you, but there's still no real threat
Red means that there are people disagreeing with them in the white-house that they want to keep silent
No relation to terrorisim threat levels
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Unpublicized successes
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
how long will it be
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: how long will it be
It would be humorous to hack the BB and put up a pic of your least favorite political figure.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: how long will it be
how long will it be before an innocent "suspect" is beaten to death by a mob....?"
i dont know... how long does it take when the picture is already in the newspaper, on the evening news, and on wanted posters on local storefronts and in the post office?????
[ link to this | view in thread ]
A pretty damn long time...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Theres a LOT of things LE is doing that bears watching (cameras at every step in major US cities for example) but I honestly don't see where this has the "slippery slope" thing going for it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Crowds have stood by while woman have been beaten and raped, old men knifed, etc and no one bothered to help, do you really beleive we'll all suddenly turn vigilante because a few faces show up on local cable?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
sounds like criminals will get even more desperate go out in a blaze of glory. People that have nowhere to go don't always give up by walking into a police station
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
scared
[ link to this | view in thread ]
america's most wanted...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Hopefully Ron Paul Will Eliminate FBI
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Why all the hubbub?
The only thing our gov't and its various agencies are good at anymore is lying, stealing and torturing brown people.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
law enforcement on rye, hold the orwell
1) 150 screens in a country the size of the US is not that many screens. assuming they put up multiple screens in a city and only in big cities, chances are there won't be any where you live. when the number grows to 1500, or 3000, then it's time to be concerned.
2) it's the FBI putting up pictures of people it's looking for and not more cameras. screens are good, cameras and wiretaps are bad. this is about finding the actual bad guys, not turning citizens into bad guys. not everything the FBI does is a direct threat to our civil liberties.
3) this is a move that invites us, the citizenry, into the law enforcement process. this is them trusting us to help. presumably, this is the next extension of the "amber alert system". there are text screens on the highways in the cincinnati area that give you updates on traffic situations and amber alerts. this is a means for law enforcement to obtain intel that doesn't involve taps, cameras, data mining, or rendition. programs like this one are how the FBI *should* be operating.
the question that we should all be asking, is why are they using clear channel billboards? is this an exclusive deal? was this one of those no bid contracts? did clear channel donate the screens? clear channel is a huge national media conglomerate, will local law enforcement be able to make use as well?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Hopefully Ron Paul Will Eliminate FBI
Ron Paul, Hillary, Rudy, and the gang are running for President, not King (like our current ruler has established himself.) Regardless of their claims, Congress still passes the laws.
Ron Paul claims he can eliminate so much of the government, Dennis claims he can shut down the nuclear plants, Hillary is going to implement national health care. I hereby call BS on all these claims, as those are not within the powers of the President to do according to their will.
Back on topic, yes the FBI will screw this up some and innocent folk will suffer. But remember the pedophile sought by England was found by using the Internet to track him down in southeast Asia. Who reads the wanted poster in the Post Office nowdays?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
What exactly is this story about again? Something new? I think not.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Um..Running Man, anyone?
Doesn't anyone remember Running Man? Doesn't this type of system seem uncomfortably authoritarian? I'm not even certain the "criminals" in these posters etc. are who Big Brother says they are. It's easy to slap a "drug dealer" or "pedophile" label on someone; but do we really know?
As I recall, the FBI and ATF floated a couple of such trial balloons against the victims at David Kouresh's church in Waco. First they tried sticking weapons charges on them; hand grenades or automatic weapons. Never did see any evidence of that. Next they tried sticking drug charges on them--claiming they were manufacturing methamphetamine. No evidence for that, either.
No; if anyone should be demonized, it's our beloved government.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Um..Running Man, anyone?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Coverage is spotty false and misleading
That is foolhardy in so many ways it is hard to nail down:
When the three letter agencies are successful, we do not hear a word publicly, need to know.
Criminals feeling they have no where to go is a dangerous thing, and if you had ever gone hungry long enough, you would realize much crime is resultant of same, thus "feelings" are weak substitutes for "Food and shelter".
You are right, except we have gone so far beyond Big Brother (excepting the daily workouts) it is quite alarming-
No one is alarmed, yet everything down to the time we evacuate our bowels, take a shower, make love, every tiny detail, is easily knowable by Gov.
We are in big big trouble if Techdirt writers have also lost perspective on what the current status of technology and society is.
Example: In most of our USA society, if you are single, male, disabled, even a veteran, you can first spend a decade trying to get help from USA while you starve. The USA does not have a program for us unless we are female, or a child (veterans under 18 and disabled, very few existing, are covered with public and other benefits very well) but a grown man is just plain screwed.
Not your fault, Techdirt, its getting too complicated to sense where we presently are sociologically because we all are on semi-independent squirrel cages of activity, never looking across anymore at our contemporaries.
Thank you regardless of the sad state of reporting.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ahwell, it's all for the good of the country, right?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
what if we could simply turn on and activate everyone's webcams without anyone knowing (hijacking a webcam can be done) to take a peek in everyone's homes for the criminal without them even knowing!
C'mon, its to SAVE the CHILDREN ! ! !
I MEAN, you do know that there are already mic's in your computer that haven't been turned on to one day listen in on your household and then pop up google adds on your screen based on the candid conversations you have at home!
Microsoft and Google are just waiting for a way to integrate an EULA to hide the "activate microphone listening" button... of course you won't read the EULA and simply click on accept and BAM! you are now wondering how this ever happened.
Well, Dell currently installs LOJack and these microphones on every computer made. Luckily, they are delivered with these tracking and monitoring systems in the OFF positions.
google it and see for yourself!
BB's are a way to desensitize you!!!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]