Will Infamous JPEG Patent Get A Re-Exam?
from the about-time dept
We've already talked about how Ray Niro, a well-known patent attorney, has been filing lawsuits over a patent he claims covers any website with a JPEG image. He's been known to particularly target his critics. It appears that all of the attention this patent has generated, has resulted in at least one party filing with the Patent Office to request a re-exam of the patent. While the patent has already gone through a re-exam in the past, and only this one claim survived, it would be nice to get it completely rejected.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: jpeg patent, ray niro, re-exam
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
oh hum
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Rambling about lean systems
Too many things changed recently. Less than five years ago, companies had the idea of "You need to replace your product before someone else does" and the idea of patenting processes was something of an afterthought. This was why we had new OSs released every few years, why companies decided to "Take a Swing" and try new concepts in their stores.
So until recently, 7-11 used to have frozen coffee machines in many of their stores. Today, I miss the convenience of getting a faux frappuchino from 7-11 when I wanted one. I don't know the details, but maybe someone in legal got involved and as a result, 7-11 stopped selling frozen coffee drinks.
What happened last summer explains a few things- Starbucks announced weaker earnings due to "increased demand for frozen drinks".
In short, the market was artifically restrained under the auspice of copyright/patent law, and the business failed to accominidate future demand.
Now, don't get me wrong, I love Starbucks. I even started planning on leaving for work 20 minutes early to get through the drive-thru line. But these efforts for getting a cup of Joe became especially apparent when I was stuck in a drive-thru line and had to pull out the laptop and lookup conference call information for a meeting with D-levels while I was stuck in a line for coffee.
So I learned from this negative experience and decided to start making my own.
Today this idea of constraint seems to be the exception, rather than the practice. When will lean, customer-driven systems become the answer rather than the exception? A lot can be learned from the Toyota Production System.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The only reason I still use JPEG is that it's basically the MP3 of the low-end digital camera industry. My cell-phone and my cheap Samsung camera give me no other option, but I'm more than happy to convert afterwards, since all my viewing devices fully support PNG and many other types.
Ideally, we should just drop JPEG entirely, and let it and it's stupid patent fade into bitter nostalgia.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ooops!
Anyways, licensing is the key, especially when a market has been identified.
I can't find the article, so I feel very redfaced, and will go to the Starbucks HQ on Monday and give an apology.
I still love Starbucks. Sorry Howard Schultz!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Ooops!
Seriously though, and I know this is a lot to ask for, but I'd LOVE for copyright and patent laws to roll back and re-asses the changes that need to be made for digital goods. It seems to me that things were changed arbitrarily or selfishly without proper research.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I really, really, really, really, really, really,
[ link to this | view in thread ]
patents on tech
There is .tiff, .png, etc to replace .jpg
Anytime legalman gets involved, everything gets a little worse for everyone.
Remember when SCO was suing everyone running Linux?
Haven't heard about that for awhile.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Ooops!
From the Page: "Throughout the ages, there have been many unanswered questions that continue to baffle the human race. Who built Stonehenge? Is there life on other planets? Why does the TSA make me place my liquids in a clear sealable baggie?"
Enjoy.
http://www.tsa.gov/blog/
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Jpeg 2000
Most of the patent was dismissed due to prior art = but what parts were reinstated
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I find it funny that http://www.uspto.gov has jpeg
[ link to this | view in thread ]