Major Labels Under Antitrust Investigation
from the yet-again dept
Apparently the Justice Department is suddenly worried that the four major record labels are colluding in creating a new online music subscription service. The last time this happened was back when the record labels tried to (wait, this sounds familiar) create online music subscription services -- which were universally panned, rarely used and eventually shut down. So, even if the labels are colluding, given their strategic vision, it seems rather unlikely that they're going to leverage their position to dominate the market. They certainly could hold back other services -- but it seems like they've been doing that for years already, just with their own shortsightedness.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: antitrust, collusion, justice department, labels, riaa, subscription service
Companies: riaa
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
WTF?
"The subscription model is the only way to save the music business," Rubin has said. "If music is easily available at a price of five or six dollars a month, then nobody will steal it."
Sounds like someone got the idea finally.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Their approach raises antitrust issues because the label's would control the entire supply chain. The Justice Department takes a dim view of vertical integration/dominance.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:WTF?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I doubt it's just the offering of the service
The RIAA has certainly made it clear that nobody but them will be allowed to operate such a program and they are using DRM or Illegal Downloads, or whatever else they can to prevent it. They are THE reason the downloads haven't taken off with the exception of iTunes, and they keep trying to cripple that...
EtG
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Post number 2
id love a service like that.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Wha?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:WTF?
If I sell a product threw resellers and then all of a sudden I chose to sell it directly and not have resellers any more, is that monopolistic? Not if I still have competition. The RIAA still had the smaller labels and indie bands to contend with.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Go away.
[ link to this | view in thread ]