Think Solar-Intel, Not Solar-Google
from the hop-on-the-bandwagon dept
As more entrepreneurs set their sights on the potential to make money (and ostensibly do some "good" in the process) in the solar power industry, it would seem obvious that Silicon Valley would emerge as a hotbed of activity. Anecdotally, Silicon Valley is home to more aspiring founders and CEOs per capita than any other place in the world; people flock here ready to take their shot at the-next-big-thing. The Valley's many success stories have spawned a large group of people who have the name recognition and/or money needed to tackle big challenges. In a recent column, The New York Times draws connections between the experience and aspirations of Silicon Valley's business elite and the likelihood Silicon Valley could also become "Solar Valley".While many people are looking for the first solar industry Google to emerge, it is companies like Intel that provide the better template for what Solar Valley businesses might look like (Moore's Law having nothing to do with it). Google became a household name and corporate giant barely a half decade after its founding. Key to that success is competing in an industry with low capital requirements, and where creating a successful brand can be a self-fulfilling. On the other hand, Intel was around for twenty five years before its marketing efforts led people to start asking for Intel Inside; even today Intel's products remain essentially hidden behind the more visible brands of PC manufacturers. Like chip companies, solar businesses face capital-intensive startup and long product development cycles. As a whole, the solar industry faces development hurdles like land acquisition, permitting, environmental review, and transmission capacity, which will limit the rate at which solar companies can grow. And solar companies are unlikely to earn much of a premium on their name: your electricity bill will not say Energized By Ausra any time soon. Even residential products will be sold through local solar installers, and homeowners are more likely to choose an installer based on the best value for the service than any particular panel manufacturer that that installer represents.
There's no doubt that interest and investment in solar power will continue to grow in Silicon Valley, and the area will almost certainly produce success stories. But the nature of the industry means that most of the magazine covers will stay reserved for members of the Internet crowd.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: silicon valley, solar
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Disagree...ment
So I'm expecting that eventually when residential applications start to actually show up on people's roofs. Very large houses (righ people) will have the higher efficiency panels, and smaller houses (not so rich people) will have their entire roofs covered with the cheaper less efficient type.
I think that is going to probably be a pretty fundamental divide in the 'consumer' solar panel market for some time, barring of course any other major breakthroughs in materials or manufacturing (which also wouldn't suprise me...)
So... rather than being concerned with how much you are going to pay your local installer to put them up, you are probably going to be pretty damn concerned with where you can get the type of panels that suit your budget/roof area.
It could pan out though that there are several different companies that make each type, or possibly several companies that make both types as well. But it looks to me like the patents covering this sort of thing would probably limit the number of manufacturers pretty severely.
In any event I don't really see much likelihood in the predictions made in the article coming to pass... Well, other than the fact that we probably won't see the solar industry become as big, or make as many business stars as the internet did.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The cheaper manufacturing costs of the (current) non-silicon panels is more than outweighed by the fact they are far less durable. Costs go up pretty quick when you have to replace some percentage of cracked panels every year along with the entire array every 5-8 years.
I do agree that it's quite possible that we'll see some pretty amazing new technologies for converting solar energy to electricity, which would change the entire discussion.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Why?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
wy not?
[ link to this | view in thread ]