Why Do Newspapers Make It So Difficult To Advertise On Their Websites?
from the not-getting-it dept
By now, most newspapers have recognized that they need an online strategy -- even if many are struggling to realize that this means a lot more than just throwing their news articles online. Case in point: even once they're online, most newspapers still make you go through the process of talking to a human and signing a deal before you can advertise on their website. This, despite the fact that so many other online-only properties now have a nearly totally automated process for advertisers to sign up, upload (or create) creatives, and have the advertisements go live. Newspapers need to realize that going online isn't just about the medium, but taking advantage of what that medium allows.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: advertisements, newspapers
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
lol
Not because I think that talking to a real person is more efficient, or that I miss the "good ole days" or anything, but just because about 10-20 years ago, people were worried that humans would eventually be taken out of the equation, and that this would be bad.
I find the reversal of opinion amusing.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
It's not the talking to a human
"pay attention because our menu has changed"
"say or enter your blah blah blah"
if pressing zero doesn't get you a human, eventually you just hang up.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I like pressing Zero
Today, it's too difficult, and the funny folks along with the serious folks use Craigslist.
Sorry printed text, even you Wall Street Journal. I read you in my email before you get to my doorstep..
Yikes! Rupert Murdoch seems to know something here. You best listen.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
God forbid you should have to speak with a human, Mike.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
You can still review...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
talking to a human
[ link to this | view in thread ]
because..
I don't understand why that is myself, mind you, but that *is* the newspaper business as I've experienced it over the past 7+ years at this point. There are a lot of other things you won't understand either like why some of the content producers(articles, comics, astrology, etc.) won't let you publish their work on your site that receives less than 1,000 not-necessarily-unique visits every week but you maintain 50,000 print readers and you can print it.
Newspapers, as businesses, would not exist if everyone actually understood from where their worth is actually derived.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: You can still review...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Lots of point-missing here
No one is saying eliminate human intervention entirely. If your big advertisers prefer to work through a human, let them. But how many potential advertisers are being missed because they don't want to deal with that hassle? Make a web-based form, but leave the option to work with a person. Hell, you could even charge a premium for the human touch.
There, I've just given you a new, revenue-enhancing business model. I won't even patent it; use it with my blessing.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Lots of point-missing here
Sadly, what you don't realize is that web revenue makes up **fractions of pennies** compared to what is brought in through print advertising and many/most web adverts are actually offered as "value-added" to the print publications since the overall revenue from the web barely covers the bandwidth charges.
A single full-page advert will bring in more revenue in a single issue than any sized web advert would bring in over the course of a year, and selling a page full of smaller adverts can almost double the revenue for that page. You can't fill an online page with adverts(ie no content) and then suspect to maintain a readership for very long.
Why would a newspaper add a new department that would need to integrate the web with their print advertising for something that won't even cover its cost to setup much less to maintain the employees who run it, etc.? If they were web-based then that might make sense but they're not and paying to create a system that is only going to slow production down and/or add cost isn't going to be looked at as generously as you would like to presume.
Worrying about webverts when you're in the print business is like jumping over dollars to pickup dimes. It seems like real money to you folks but it would barely cover the cost of toilet paper in the long run.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Me: I have a question about my bill.
AS: It sounds like you'd like to pay your bill, is this correct?
Me: No
AS: Sorry, my mistake. Please tell me the purpose of your call.
Me: I have a question about my bill.
AS: Let's try this another way...
Me: Customer support.
AS: In order to connect you to the proper support department, I need to know why you're calling...
ME: CUSTOMER SUPPORT!!!
AS: Please hold while I connect your call.
[ link to this | view in thread ]