Windows Vista Copy Protection Cracked
from the yeah-we're-shocked-too dept
More than a year after Windows Vista was introduced, hackers have finally developed a clean crack of Windows Vista. There have been a variety of workarounds for Vista's copy protection before now, but this is the first time someone has figured out a way to install a cracked version that would pass all of Microsoft's various anti-piracy checks. It seems that certain OEMs found the activation process too burdensome and persuaded Microsoft to provide them with a way to bypass it in order to save their own customers the hassle. Hackers figured out how to activate this special "no activation" mode on cracked copies of Vista. I think this is one of the biggest reasons copy protection schemes fail: they almost always creates serious inconveniences for customers, and irritating customers hurts the bottom line. Companies may talk a tough line about fighting piracy, but when push comes to shove, they're not willing to cut off their own nose to spite their face by insisting on enforcing a copy protection scheme that would put their product at a disadvantage in the marketplace.Of course, the obvious question is why companies implement copy protection schemes in the first place if they invariably wind up compromising them. The reason, I think, is that these trade-offs are almost never made explicit to corporate decision makers ahead of time. When the copy protection plan is being pitched to management, its developers only talk about how great it will work. Only later, once it's actually being implemented, do people start noticing that it will also cause a lot of problems. But by that time, the copy protection system is too far along the development process to be canned, so instead exceptions are added. These exceptions prevent the copy protection system from crippling the product, but they also undermine its effectiveness as an anti-piracy measure. So customers have to deal with annoying restrictions and the product still gets pirated.
Update: Uh oh! As some readers are pointing out, it looks like this story is actually from March 4, 2007. Somebody submitted the story to Slashdot, and I foolishly linked to it without double-checking the date. My apologies for the oversight. In retrospect, I should have been more suspicious, because if Vista really went more than a year without a crack, that would probably have set some kind of record.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: drm, windows vista
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I will talk a tough line on "piracy", but will actually do nothing about it.
Instead, I'll give them the source code, among the freedom to sell it at any prices they want, etc. There is no doubt that it will pleases my customers tremendously.
By encouraging Business Software Alliance to prosecute people and similar organizations, I hope to capture customers from BSA's members.
Yep, it is an evil opportunistic, dirty plan.
But the only people who benefit from fighting piracy is companies that doesn't do anything about it. I am simply encouraging them so I can benefit from their foolishness.
But I am not evil enough to go through the plan, anyway. So it will never happen.
If someone actually does that, I don't know whether to say if they are evil or just opportunistic.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
someone needs to realize
over a year old to be exact!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
fact checker reporting.
http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/03/03/0622230
Notice in the url 08/03/03?
@Editor: By the way, can I say you hit the nail on the head with this piece. To me this stuff isn't rocket science but it's all perspective I guess. I'm speaking about our copyright system being in need of dire reform. But alas there will be no action.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
a scheme to increase market share?
They could then end up eventually claiming a far greater market share than they earned, simply due to their ability to speak out against piracy...
Naaah....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
unfortunately rather than do an about face I'm sure they'll attempt to muck up the works by adding even more draconian security measures that will likely just piss everyone off who actually paid for it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
CIP: When I worked for that big computer company with the four-letter word for a name, the company right down to the college dropout founder fought tooth and nail to convince M$ not to require OEM Windows after 2000 to be "BIOS-Locked". In the end, our founder got a direct call from Steve Ballimer telling him to "cease and decist all efforts" in this regard, or they'd refuse to license Windows as an OEM product to our company. Said founder called Gates directly, and was told "Hey, whatever Steve says, I'll back up. It's his job to make these decisions."
...Another thing to consider is that M$ also has told all OEMs, as well as the "Mom & Pop" resellers that sell licensed OEM versions that *they*, and not M$, are the first line of contact in these revalidation issues. The problem there is that unless they've been given that "legal crack" tool, there really ain't jack shit they *can* do but send them to M$, where they have to deal with some idiot in India who most likely was panhandling on some street in Calcutta the week before, and probably won't be able to help you in any case.
...In any case, I'll be getting a copy of that tool for my own use. Currently I'm not running Vista - I'm not that much of a masochist - but if I ever make that plunge I want to have it on hand just in case.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Old Crack
I first saw this crack a few weeks after the Vista Launch. And Microsoft has already stated that Vista SP1 will break this crack.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Is this really surprising
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Hah
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Manufacturer's Keys
Found out the key for Vista that was on my machine was _not_ the one Dell gave me. It's the key the use to setup the machines in the factory.
I don't know if it is the same on all laptops, or all dell inspiron 1501's, but if it is then it is a key that you can use over and over _and_ register it.
Because when I registered vista I didn't have to put in any info. And the CD that Dell gave me hasn't been registered.
Course if i'm wrong i can just use one of these as old as Vista cracks to get around it.
But who would want to crack Vista anyways? XP is so much better.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Old Old Old Old
I don't understand.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
doesn't seem true blue
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Oh goody!
Even if MS gave it away for free, it still wouldn't be worth having.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
It's a disgrace
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
re: not checking dates
Unfortunately they did not post an update to the story as you did, I'm sure this is further mis-leading people.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
MS and Vista and the crack
Now as to the Crack just look for a paradox, lol paradox-icly you will find a Vista Activator.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Hacker Cracks Vista
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I know that already....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Do companies create pirates
For example, which would you do:
1) Download an illegal copy of Windows Vista, install it, and start working.
(Never mind the argument that an illegal copy is illegal and so on.)
2) Purchase Vista at "brand name store", take it home, install it, and then spend the rest of the evening fighting with the "protection", such as:
"Could not install your modem driver. Please call this 800 number and give the operator the following 32-character key. You will then be given a 64-character challenge key which you must enter into the space provided. Then give the operator the correct 16-character challenge-response key. Your copy of Windows will now be activated.
Please call between the hours of 8:00am and 5:00pm. Please talk slowly and clearly since your call be routed to our call center in India. Please pay very close attention to the information they read back to you in their very thick accent. It is very important that you enter the exact codes or this copy of Windows will not work and you won't be able to get back to answering e-mail."
I forget where I read it, but I remember people talking about how they would purchase a legit copy and then download and install the cracked version just because it was easier to deal with.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Do companies create pirates
1) put a product in your pocket and walk out
2) get product and go the register. wait in line give them credit card which the number of can get stolen. or pay them cash which you can get killed for once outside the store.. Such a hastle....
I mean I've sean people buy something in the store.. and then if they need another item they just take and it walk out without paying its so much easier to deal with.,,,
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: It's a disgrace
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: It's a disgrace
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That Is Crazy Record Time
[ link to this | view in thread ]
update
[ link to this | view in thread ]