Is An Online Study Group Cheating?
from the once-it's-on-facebook,-it-must-be dept
Vincent Clement writes in to let us know that that a student at Ryerson University in Toronto is facing expulsion for setting up an online study group for his chemistry class using Facebook. The school is saying it wasn't so much a study group as it was a place for 146 students to cheat and share answers (though, it's only blaming the student who ran the group). Students at the university are reasonably up in arms over the matter, as they don't see how it's any different than a traditional study group. Of course, the whole thing seems a little bit silly. As we discussed almost exactly a year ago, people working together to collaborate is an important skill in the real world, and what some people consider "cheating" these days seems a lot like the type of collaboration that kids are quite used to doing online, and which should serve them well later in life.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cheating, collaboration, college, facebook, online, ryerson university, study groups
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Finding the people who have the answers
It's not a matter of how much you know, its a matter of how fast you can solve a problem. How to best utilize resources to go from "we have a problem" to "problem solved" is EXACTLY what our young people need to learn.
Sometimes that's going to mean they can just look up answers on teh intarwebbs. THAT IS OK. 'cause that doesnt stop when they leave school and enter the holey workforce.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Finding the people who have the answers
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Finding the people who have the answers
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Finding the people who have the answers
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Finding the people who have the answers
[ link to this | view in thread ]
An online study group is a wonderful idea especially for people like me who are full time in school and at work. Getting up going to school then work leaving at 7 then eating homework will not start till almost 8 there is no time for a physical study group.
I like this idea a lot and might start one for my classes so if you see another report like this involving Northern Kentucky University it was most likely me.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Finding the people who have the answer
[ link to this | view in thread ]
independent home work
"Each student in the course received slightly different questions to prevent cheating"
It seems the teacher intended for these assignments to not be an exercise in groupthink.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Finding the people who have the answer
Both systems of study is needed, because there may be a day that you need to be resourceful of your own accord.
The study group sometimes consists of "a smart guy" and the rest are the "followers", just getting the answers.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: independent home work
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Disclosure policy
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Internet wont always be there.....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Finding the people who have the answers
While I agree that this can be a valuable skill in the workplace, I do not believe that it is the most important skill. I think that being able to think for yourself to come up with answers and solve problems is far more important than being able to find the person who can. In the business world, companies would prefer to have a large number of people who can think for themselves to get things done rather than a small number of people who can think for themselves to get things done that end up supporting people who come looking for answers. It's about having a more effective workforce. Not that you'll always have the answers, of course, but the less time you spend looking for answers the more productive you can be. Not to mention the fact that the "answer-givers" tend to be worth more than "answer-seekers". So why would you want to paint yourself as the latter?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
How odd.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
It's stupid and a waste of everyone's time.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Finding the people who have the answers
You can have 1000s internets but sometimes a solution requires a novel idea, not just some regurgitation of a previous solution (which was also novel at some point). It seems people just don't realize that the information on the web is put there by someone who had to figure it out, if you teach everyone to search and noone to problem solve (not the same thing) you will end up with all questions and no answers.
That said, this whole story is ridiculous. If you are worried about collaboration on homework then don't count it in the grade. If you give students work to do outside of class they will leverage all resources possible to finish it quickly and correctly (especially if it's assigned on Friday night).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This is Relatively Hard to Believe
The University, and their professors, have every right to dictate conditions for their homework assignments. Unfortunately, dictating students may not work collaboratively is a practice that does not support learning. The purpose of practice (aka homework) is to learn. If a summative assessment is required, a test in class is a more appropriate way to proceed.
I doubt the university has been working to stop the on ground study groups that likely exist. It might be time for them to rethink their instructional practices instead of making a hasty over reaction.
As I read about this situation, I found myself wondering what the real issue is here. A warning and new instructional practices might be more in order. Just think, encouraging students to work collaboratively on the practice assignments might allow professors to assign more challenging tasks!
Which practice best supports overall student learning?
Cheers
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Internet wont always be there.....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
visit
[ link to this | view in thread ]