How Reliable Are Industry Announced Piracy Statistics?
from the depends-on-your-definition-of-reliable dept
Eric Goldman sent in a link to a recent research paper that aimed to look at the reliability of industry-released reports on piracy. That sounded interesting, as we've spent plenty of posts picking apart why almost all of their released numbers are bogus. In particular, we've pointed out how incredibly bogus the BSA's statistics are. So, it was somewhat surprising to have the study say that the BSA's were the most reliable, when compared to other groups like the RIAA and MPAA. If anything, though, that really just suggested that the RIAA's and MPAA's stats were even more bogus (remember, things actually got so bad for the MPAA that it had to admit how bogus its own stats were). That actually seems likely, as the BSA is the most upfront about the methodology used.However, reading through the actual report, it does little to vindicate the piracy numbers that the industry reports always trumpet. That's because the report actually focuses on the rate of unauthorized use, rather than the cost or impact of that unauthorized use -- which is the key point to come out of these reports. The rate of unauthorized use is fairly meaningless, so it doesn't matter that much who is the most accurate. It's the impact that matters. While reports used to do silly things like count every unauthorized copy as a lost sale, most have stopped that, and now use a multiplier. Some have started using a questionable ripple effect that counts the same loss multiple times and ignores the "ripple effects" in the other direction that benefit the industry. So, yes, perhaps the BSA is the best of a bad bunch, but even if the rate of unauthorized use is somewhat accurate, that has little bearing on the actual impact of those unauthorized copies.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, impact, piracy stats, reliability
Companies: bsa, mpaa, riaa
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
"Truly I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all things take place"(NAS, Luke 21:32-33)
So it's been about 2000 years since it was supposed to happen and still going strong...
Sort of reminds me of the accuracy of the argument for DRM: if we don't use it the music will be freely spread on the internet - while everyone else says duh it still is and always has been.
Don't know if I linked these very well - not that the link is relevant to the original post anyway. Basically waiting for something that was supposed to happen ages ago compared to saying something will happen if you change things when it already happened ages ago.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
it's called piracy math
300 million * everything = we owe the collective industries 300 million of everything. and a pony.
any way you slice it, the numbers don't lie.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: it's called piracy math
classic
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Just out of idle curiosity...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Just out of idle curiosity...
But maybe I'm naive...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Just out of idle curiosity...
Accurate numbers would show that we are correct in saying it's not as bad as they make it out to be but, it would also show they are as bad as we make them out to be.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Just out of idle curiosity...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: it's called piracy math
71% of the current US population uses the internet. 71% of 3x10^8 = 213,000,000 US internet users. (A)
44% of all internet connections are broadband. I think it's safe to say there isn't much piracy over dialup (at least enough to ignore for the purpose of this demonstration.) That leaves 94 million broadband users in the US. (B)
Of that 94,000,000 people, it's said that 65% use it from home as opposed to work (C). I would assume most piracy is from home too, and not in the workplace. Even allowing tolerances of 10%, that means that of the 94,000,000 people, 70,000,000 people:
Are using the internet over broadband from home.
Of that 70,000,000 people, only 57% download music (D) leaving only 40,000,000 people to download music.
According to Wired, 200,000,000 people use iTunes (E). According to MacObserver, 100,000,000 people use iTunes (F). So let's say that only 20% of the worlds iTunes users are from the US. Of the 200,000,000 world users, only 40,000,000 are from the US.
Therefore, since there are 40,000,000 iTunes users in the US, and there are 40,000,000 individuals that download music in the US, all music downloaded MUST be legal...
...at least using piracy math!
Sources:
(A) http://www.internetworldstats.com/am/us.htm
(B) http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/tables/08s1128.pdf
(C) http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/tables/08s1127.pdf
(D) http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/tables/08s1129.pdf
(E) http://www.wired.com/gadgets/mac/commentary/cultofmac/2005/10/69193
(F) http://www.macobserver.com/stockwatch/2005/10/17.1.shtml
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: it's called piracy math
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I work for a GameDev company, doing level design. This means I should play a lot of computer games. Hell, everybody in the company should -- being in the know is their job. You know what their favourite store is, 95% market share?
The Net. And I don't mean Steam.
They develop games for a living, and they don't even have enough decency to buy a single copy and pass it around. I used to bring my private copies to work for them to borrow, but they would just use them to make copies of their own.
Just a few days ago one of designers was asked to play Call of Duty 4 specifically, because the game we're working on is supposed to maintain similar tone. He's been essentially asked to spend thirty bucks on self-improvement. I know he can afford it because I can and he makes more than I do.
"Nah, waste of money", is what he said.
It's the third company I work for and it has always been like this. Buy a game? What for?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: it's called piracy math
but what about the pony?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The Free Market Answer to Digital Piracy
If it works, then all this bellyaching over piracy, DRM, region encoding, file-sharing etc can all be swept into the past. What's now digital piracy will become royalty-free fair use, bought and paid for in a free market.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]