Who Wants To Watch Full Length Movies On Their Mobile Phones?
from the please-tell-me-this-is-an-april-fools-joke dept
We were just talking about how people don't want to watch broadcast TV on their mobile phones, as the content isn't really designed for people on the go, and all of a sudden Sony thinks that people will want to watch full-length feature films on their mobile phones? Yes, Sony has worked out a deal to offer streaming feature films on AT&T mobile phones starting in May. The films are old films that have already had all the marketing life squeezed to death out of them ("Karate Kid," "Ghostbusters," "Bugsy"). While there won't be a charge to watch them, they will include advertisements (because there's nothing people like better than watching commercials on a tiny mobile screen as they wait to see the ending of "Ghostbusters"). Oh yeah, also, viewers have no control over the timing. It's not "on-demand," it'll just be an ongoing loop. Weren't companies like AT&T just complaining about too much bandwidth being wasted?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: content, mobile phones, movies, streaming
Companies: at&t, sony
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
How about a web tablet, e.g. Nokia N800
I managed to squeeze a movie into 128Mb. So given you can put two memory cards in it, e.g. 16MB, that would allow the loading of 128 movies (in case you needed such a large choice). You can buy small rechargable battery packs to extend viewing time from 2 hours to the 12 or so that you might need in a long series of plane flights.
Not everyone can afford business class flights.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: How about a web tablet, e.g. Nokia N800
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: How about a web tablet, e.g. Nokia N800
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What in hell is a "cellphone"?
Of course, I jest, but this move by Sony isn't surprising given that people actually PAY for their favorite song to be added as an annoying ringtone.
Here's what's going to happen. Sony will release these movies for free. People will download them, because it's there. Then, when Sony sees this, they'll say "Damn, dudes! People do want to see movies on their iPhones! We were right! Now, let's charge these idiots and sue everyone else for file sharing via RIAA."
Call it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Screens are getting better...
However, it turns out that the iPhone screen really is good enough for watching films while commuting and I've actually started copying films in from time to time.
But since you rarely have 2 hours of dedicated time, it's the sort of thing that you want to have locally since you'll watch at bit and then get interrupted, pause and continue later. Which means that this rolling broadcast model is not interesting at all for a user perspective.
The iPhone software automatically bookmarks your progress in the files (and even rewinds by a couple of seconds) so you're dropped back in where you left off automatically.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A better delivery
It is indeed a waste of bandwidth. It would probably be better simply to turn the whole thing into a wireless Internet and let people choose whether they send text, voice, data, or video.
There'd be no point in broadcasting movies because these can be distributed via landlines and uploaded to mobile phones via a domestic wifi service (which could be made hassle free). The only benefit of broadcasting to mobiles would be for live video feeds (news, sport, etc.).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lol...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Can't Wait
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Use Nokia N81 8Gb
Install Smart Movie Software on Computer
Get Movie as AVI and convert using Smartmovie Desktop
Install Smart Movie Software on Phone
Transfer converted AVI (approx 700Mb) to phone
Using headset watch and enjoy even if crammed on Londons Finest Tube Train !!
So it might be a bit small and strain your eyes.. but the quality is superb !!
www.lonelycatgames.com/?app=smartmovie
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nope...
1) the movies were free
2) no ads
3) more people had unlimited internet connections
People are not going to go out of their way to watch movies on their mobile, you have to give them some good incentives. (probably a lot of good incentives)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Nope...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
full length movies on mobile phones.
Waiting for the feature to be started soon.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I used this on a trial basis, the quality is good and it was quite useful when stuck waiting in places that I did not want to be at, The Hospital for example.
The tv portion does not kill your battery, it does not use data connections, there is no buffering or downloading, it streams and it's like your TV at home minus a DVR and quite smaller.
It was also rather convenient to quite my nieces by putting on the cartoon channel while we were in the car.
The ads I saw were the same frequency I would see as if I was watching regular tv I truly did not see any downside to having this feature. It was kind of a cool experience to get to use it for a while and like most of you above before I used it I was thinking, who the hell would want this crap. I wouldn't use it everyday but once you get to see and use it you may feel differently. I know not everyone will ilke, want or use it but I would.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Bandwidth consumption?
Just like listening to a phone's built in FM radio, it's just up to the user as to whether they actually want to watch broadcast/streamed TV.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Oh, I know it's using Qualcomm's MediaFLO offering, but it's wrong to say that it "does not use data bandwidth." It's just using it via MediaFLO, which is basically a waste of spectrum and a huge expensive albatross for Qualcomm at this point. That spectrum could have been put to much better use.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Maybe I'm just old fashoned, but I buy a phone to make calls. It seems most companies are starting to forget that these days.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This does not surprise me in the least, in fact I'm more surprised that a major player like the US has taken so long in catching up with technology that is at least 2 years old here.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
i do
the problem with a lot of mobile services is that they make sense in europe and asia where people use public transportation and are sitting around doing nothing.
in the us, everyone who could afford those kinds of services drives a car and there are hundred laws in place that make it illegal to even think about a cell phone when you are within a hundred feet of a car.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Well, Yeah. But...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I used my phone to watch TV
The screen is small, but it works amazingly well. The player on the BB pearl isn't the best, but it's surprisingly good, and when you compress the shows they actually aren't too big, so they fit on my microSD card.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Battery
There are two main battery burners when people watch video on their phone. Number one is the screen, number two is the processor which is used to decode the video stream. The third, the radio, is less relevant here since it is just in receive mode, not transmitting. So, sorry, but you're wrong, this does consume a lot of battery power.
Broadcast TV, like MediaFLO, is a relatively efficient use of spectrum, since at least all users share the same data feed, as opposed to unicast streaming, where each user needs their own data feed to watch video. But as Mike said, he doesn't have a lot of faith in MediaFLO as a business, largely because mobile usage patterns don't match a broadcast TV model.
BTW, my predictions are that within 5 years, every single one of you will be watching some amount of video on your phones. You will watch some broadcast, some unicast streams, and some that is stored on your device (from a PC, storage card, Wi-Fi network or similar). You will do it because it will be cheap, built-in, and readily accessible.
However, you will not be doing it in the way that the mobile carriers and Qualcomm currently expect. They expect you to pay between $10 and $15 a month for mobile TV. Those business plans will fail, people will accept mobile TV, but most won't pay that much for it (especially when you already pay for content at your home). Only a few premium channels will appeal to a subset of customers for high subscription fees.
I currently watch a fair bit of video on my phone. The small screen doesn't bother me - it seems adequate. What do I watch? I use Slingbox to tune in my home Tivo, and I watch the same stuff I would at home. Yesterday I was in Las Vegas leaving the CTIA show, and boarded my plane early. While waiting to depart, I fired up a 30-minute comedy show on my phone, plugged in my headset, and enjoyed. When the pilot announced "electronics off", I paused my Tivo, and turned off the phone. Upon arrival at home two hours later, the Tivo was ready, still paused at the exact point I left it. I watched the last 5 minutes of the show. User experience: excellent. Incremental cost to me: nil. Did AT&T get screwed by me? No, I subscribe to an unlimited phone data plan, and they make plenty money off me.
That was streaming from my Tivo, but I also have a few shows stored on the phone for in-flight viewing, from each of kids DVDs, Amazon Unbox, and from Tivo-to-go.
Now, I'm an uber-geek. But this stuff is only getting easier to do, cheaper, and embedded in more devices (think iPhone and the Apple content stores). You'll be doing it soon enough.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Who watches movies on phones? I do - but not theirs.
My iPhone plays video extremely well, has a great wide screen, and fits in my pocket. The audio is great through headphones and no worse than a cheap motel TV through the speakers. It has a compact cable which allows me to play the movies back on a full-sized TV if needed. I throw the cable and my charger in my carry-on when I travel. I watch movies in waiting rooms, in airports, on planes, in hotel rooms, on my patio, and other places where I have long periods of time to kill.
As far as streaming TV goes, I will never pay for streaming network TV. I already pay Cox far too much to watch network TV and I certainly don't do it according to their schedule. I have a DVR box to watch only the shows I want, when I want to watch them. That is the only way I will ever watch TV. I would, on the other hand, buy a SlingBox for a one-time charge and stream my OWN choices of shows when I want them. Once there is an iPhone client, I may just do that.
Media sources need to get it into their collective heads that this is now a "have it your way" society. We want only what we want, precisely when we want it, and delivered exactly how we want it delivered. If they can provide those precise capabilities, and find a way to make money at it in the process, they will be immensely successful. Google is a prime example. If they don't provide those capabilities, we don't settle for a half-baked attempt. We find another way to get it.
The greedy media companies killed brand loyalty and consumer respect for their corporate needs long ago. Their decade of aggressive customer-hating actions made it so most folks wouldn't care if every company in that whole industry died and dried up tomorrow. If they did, modern digital-age companies with far more sense would step in and take it all over in a heartbeat providing exactly what we want with less fuss and greater sucess.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Who watches movies on phones? I do - but not theirs.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
PLEASE HELP ME
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: just think...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How do i get videos
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Given the choice
[ link to this | view in chronology ]