AP Examines Just How Ridiculous ISP Contracts Are

Another UK ISP Insists It Won't Become A Copyright Cop; Scolds BPI

from the not-here-to-do-your-work dept

Fri, Apr 4th 2008 2:38pm — Mike Masnick

Well there go those plans. Over in the UK, the British equivalent of the RIAA, the BPI, was pretty confident that it had the government on its side in forcing ISPs to become copyright cops and to kick off users found to be sharing unauthorized files. However, it looks like the BPI may have gotten a little ahead of itself. First, the BPI leaked to the press that Virgin Media would voluntarily agree only to have the ISP vehemently deny that it would do any such thing. Now, TalkTalk, the third largest ISP in the country isn't just saying it won't be a copyright cop fot the BPI, but its CEO is angrily denouncing the BPI for sending "the most unbelievably rude letter" demanding it do so. As its CEO said, it's as if the BPI is making ISPs pay the price for the record labels own failure to adopt: "They're not just shutting the stable door after the horse has bolted -- the horse has left town, got married, and started a family." The BPI, for its part, has also responded angrily claiming that TalkTalk "just doesn't get it." It then goes on to talk about "fairness" and "partnerships" apparently missing the irony that the record labels are notorious for not being particularly fair and being absolutely terrible partners.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: bans, bpi, copyright, isps, uk
Companies: bpi, talktalk

10 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 4 Apr 2008 @ 4:25pm

You'd expect the BPI to do so much better, what with following the successful Business Model the RIAA has laid out for them. I guess if the people you are trying to sue are defended by companies that actually have a backbone for a change, it's hard to have a successful RIAA based business model.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Jake, 4 Apr 2008 @ 5:01pm

Hoo Boy...
Even if the BPI is being truthful in claiming that all they want British ISPs to do is react if handed proof that their clients are using their service to break the law -which in and of itself is not an unreasonable request, if we leave aside the question of exactly what constitutes copyright infringement and whether it's even practical to try to uphold the law as it stands now- they've shot themselves in both feet and a kneecap with the tone of that letter. They can certainly forget taking any kind of legal action against ISPs, too; even if the precedents weren't firmly in the defence's favour -nobody's ever sued a phone company and won because one of their clients made drug deals by phone, for example- judges tend to look with disfavour upon claimants who have attempted to use the threat of legal action as an intimidation tactic.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 4 Apr 2008 @ 5:49pm

What ja gonna do
Hot on the heals of the hit tv series COPS, is a new release this fall called POPs, (Publishers On Patrol).
We fade into the scene next to a POP driving a keyboard. He is on the look out for perps downloading copyrighted content. He explains how he really likes his job and the fact that his father was a POP. Suudenly he detects an illegal download occurring in the 163rd subnet of a local ISP. Quickly he saves the log for analysis and fowarding to the ISP in eager anticipation of an address. After commercial break, we join the swat team assembled outside the perps residence, tazers in hand. Stay tuned next week for the exciting raid and apprehension of this suspected terrorist, err I mean pirate, err maybe copyright infringer.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
PaulT (profile), 5 Apr 2008 @ 12:46am

Nice
Great to see the ISPs standing up to these people. They had me worried to begin with!

Perhaps the BPI should remember what they were sowing a few years ago that's making them reap lower profits. This is the same organisation that used "trademark" laws to prevent websites like CDWow from importing CDs from Asia, forcing them to use UK suppliers (and therefore, much higher prices). All in the name of "saving jobs" of course, while in reality helping to drive the industry into the ground.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
NoCokeForYou, 5 Apr 2008 @ 5:41am

Withdrawl?
withdrawl
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 5 Apr 2008 @ 7:06am

and in related news
deep packets lead to deep pockets ...

Is that Phorm I smell ? Ewwwwwwwww

Every Click You Make
Internet Providers Quietly Test Expanded Tracking of Web Use to Target Advertising
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/03/AR2008040304052.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
claire rand, 5 Apr 2008 @ 9:53am

uk legal system
trouble for the BPI is, they can try to get criminal charges, but that basically won't happen without them doing a lot of expensive leg work. and they won't get a penny back at the end of it.

or they can try a civil action, but they have to *prove* losses. the uk system does not allow them to profit form such actions, only to recover losses and reasonable costs.

hence you don't make a living suing someone over here (yet) hence the fact the BPI have to get the ISPs to do this, a few legal actions would basically bankrupt them. since *they* haven't suffered a loss. the respective companies could, but proving the loss amount would be difficult and potentially cause problems for them elsewhere.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rose M. Welch, 5 Apr 2008 @ 9:19pm

Once again...
...people who know nothing are in charge.

I'm still waiting for someone to explain how anyone (gov't, college, ISP, RIAA...) is supposed to know what files are legal and which are illegal...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Jake, 6 Apr 2008 @ 7:48am
  
  Re: Once again...
  I had assumed that there was some kind of central, searchable database of copyrighted material, though figuring out the difference between a copy of the original song and a recording of someone doing a cover version in their bedroom would be nearly impossible without human involvement.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
sathish babu, 25 Jun 2008 @ 9:18am

How to use foreign ip in india
Hello sir.
i am sathish from chennai. i want the information about foreign ip address. i want to buy a foreign ip
will u plz guide me
[ link to this | view in chronology ]