Another Failed Harvard Social Network Takes 'Legal Action' Against Facebook
from the if-connectu-could-do-it... dept
Even before ConnectU came along claiming that Mark Zuckerberg somehow "stole" the idea and the code for Facebook from them, there was another Harvard alum, Aaron Greenspan, who had been claiming something similar about how Zuckerberg took the idea from a project Greenspan set up called houseSYSTEM. When Greenspan's story (after years of him pushing it) finally got some mainstream press last year, we pointed out how ridiculous the whole story was. Facebook was hardly the first social network out there -- and ConnectU and houseSYSTEM were clearly built off the ideas of those that had come before them as well. It seemed like both cases involved folks who had failed to actually execute and build something that people liked, and were taking it out on Zuckerberg (who did successfully build something that people wanted to use) in hopes of either fame or money or both.Of course, once Facebook settled the case with ConnectU earlier this month, it was only a matter of time until Greenspan realized that he might be missing out as well. So, as you might expect, Greenspan has decided to "take legal action" against Facebook, though at this point it's merely limited to trying to get Facebook's trademark on the name revoked (claiming that houseSYSTEM used the name, and that it's widely used and generic). He may actually be right that the term is generic, but it seems more than likely that this lawsuit is just trying to drum up some attention and potentially money from Facebook.
It will come as no surprise, of course, that Greenspan is really using this lawsuit to promote his "book" which has a huge section accusing Zuckerberg of getting the idea from Greenspan. Greenspan's been promoting the book for ages, with plenty of excerpts available online. The press release Greenspan put out claims that his "publisher" (which is apparently also owned by Greenspan) was denied the ability to promote the book because it had "Facebook" in the title. Of course, he provides no details about who denied him the right to advertise, and it seems odd that anyone would prevent titles with the name "Facebook" from appearing, as such a book, by itself, probably is not a violation of Facebook's trademark. Does anyone else want to claim that Zuckerberg stole the idea for Facebook? Apparently, it's good for business.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: aaron greenspan, books, facebook, history, mark zuckerberg, trademark
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Me Too!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
(just kidding, please dont sue me!)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
yes
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Facebook a generic term?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I bet eleventy billion dollars that you might be legally retarded.
Its like a bunch of grown ups saying 'I called it first!'
Its like not even worth talking about.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
How Long Tell Social Networks DIE?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: How Long Tell Social Networks DIE?
... Doubt it.
A real point to make:
Facebook is heading in the right direction, partially. You have to remember that its applications are fairly new, and truly, there are only few that are actually of any use. Aside from all the lame 'game' apps, like vampire vs. werewolf and others that do not need mentioning... the applications are building a potent database of information that makes up who we are. In time, Facebook will adapt, or a new web (3.0?) will immerge that will make even more use of this new found knowledge.
It is a daunting task to convert data into interests of people (even powerhouses like google have not yet harnessed the potential). Facebook is going in the right direction... if you can look passed the garbage...
Not so interesting:
No one cares about people who claim to have thought of Facebook first. The mere fact that it is taking up our time and kilobytes of internet-cyber-space makes me sick. Someone really needs to slap these Harvard preps in the face and tell them to shut the fuck up.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: How Long Tell Social Networks DIE?
I agree with powerkor... Face book has the potential to become a great application... they just have to tread lightly right now, and all i do is see them stomping around like a rabid black bear on a bed of packing bubbles!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: yes
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: yes
[ link to this | view in thread ]