If Top Gov't Officials Need To Leave Blackberries Outside A Meeting, Shouldn't Someone Guard Them?
from the just-a-thought dept
Apparently a Mexican press attache at a meeting with White House officials in New Orleans saw an opportunity and swiped the Blackberries of a bunch of White House staffers. At many such meetings, it's required for attendees to leave their phones and mobile devices outside of the meeting room. You would think that with such high-powered government officials that someone would then be left to guard the devices, but apparently not. This guy grabbed a bunch of the devices and made a run for the airport, where he was caught by Secret Service officials, who promptly showed him the surveillance camera footage of him taking the devices. His response was that he thought the devices had been left behind, and he was merely picking them up to return them to their owners, which might be more believable if the folks weren't still in the meeting room when he grabbed all the devices. Who knows if it's true, but I'm still wondering why no one was guarding the Blackberries.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: blackberries, espionage, government officials, mexico, white house
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Oh look - I'm important
However - its TS for the rest of us when our data is stolen from the back seat of an employee vehicle via an unencrypted laptop.
Seriously, I now believe that at least some of these instances are on purpose and for profit.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
So maybe a better question to ask is why the government uses the same kind of security model that McDonalds uses for children's shoes in their play places?
Do they really need a person guarding the devices? Why can't they just put a big safe in the room where the government employees are having their meeting?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Well...at least he didn't claim...
Ok.
I'll go to my room now.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
If the meeting is so sensitive that electronic devices are not allowed inside ... then why is it being held at a location which lacks appropriate security accomodations ?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Well...at least he didn't claim...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
High-powered government officials get the job by being some politicians friend or family & have little knowledge of the position they are put in.
Certainly you don't expect such important people to secure crucial information left in their care.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Don't believe all the troll bait
I'm tired of reading all the "government bashing". I mean REALLY. Whatever it is you bashers do, I know that the "light of day" would show you to be even bigger dummies about this kind of crap. I digress...
I'm retired military (scoff all you want). I got a job OUTSIDE the "government" when I "retired" and what a bunch of bozo's. Yeah, I guess they could make some money, but only by selling overpriced crap to the dummies that make up 40% of our population (I'm talking at YOU aUSchtizen). The "managaged" to work themselves into a tizzy about the stupidest little things, but let the good ideas wither and die (no, not all my ideas).
So, now I work for the "government". Yeah, I get asked to do stupid shit now and again...Wanted to have a meeting and was told to provide an attendance list with names, SSN's etc via email...after I got done laughing I told them to badge my visitors themselves and call my supervisor if they didn't like it (they never did). I won't be one of those dummies with "personal information" on my stolen laptop.
Dummies work everywhere, not just the government. Most of them seem to have a computer AND say some of the dummest shit I've ever heard.
Go somewhere else and post about how our "government" is oppressing freedom of religion by removing children from an illegal and dangerous situation (yeah, I said illegal, marry two women and see where it lands YOU regardless of your "religion").
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Don't believe all the troll bait
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Don't believe all the troll bait
Well lets see...well we are getting $600 to spend! Yay! I knew I could think of something....lmao. Seriously though the bad outweighs the good by far. Politicians are way too crooked to serve us which is their job, but they are too busy taking bribes...sorry...keep saying that...I mean campaign contributions from corporations.
I soon see a revolt if things do not shape and I think the government senses it too which is why they are trying to take away citizens right to own firearms, but Bush has wiped his ass with the Constitution before so everyone has just gotten used to it. The real patriots living in the US though are getting fed up and hopefully I can be there to storm the whitehouse to drag his ass out to the street for a public trial for the crime commited towards humanity...him and all his cronies.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
quote
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Don't believe all the troll bait
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
really, did this just become another pissing contest?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Don't believe all the troll bait
Enough of the Bush Bashing. Whether you are for the war now or not, it's most likely you were for it then, so the responsibility for it's consequences weigh just as heavily on you. Quit pointing fingers and accept what you voted him to do.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Don't believe all the troll bait
[ link to this | view in thread ]
DHS Blackberrys
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Someone listening in the whole time? Wouldn't it be easier to request they are turned off or put in silent mode?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Not protected?
As far as I can tell, the reason they were not guarded is due to the fact that the secret service was recording the entire chain of events. Guarded...monitored...I can't imagine that you would need some shlub to stand there and watch 10-30 phones. Particularly not when there is a camera watching. That is sorta the point of monitoring systems...sorta
fT
[ link to this | view in thread ]
you realize were talking about the US government, right?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
To break it all down
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Don't believe all the troll bait
If we had the truth, it's highly doubtful there would be a war.
Amazing we could liberate Europe in 4 years, but liberating a teeny country will take a decade or more.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Don't believe all the troll bait
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Don't believe all the troll bait
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Typical Libs
"Wait aren't the Libs Against more goverment monitoring?", but I side track myself.
It takes 2 sides to create a situation like this, Perp and Victim. The Government were sitting big dumb and happy watching a TV monitor, mean while the Perp showed up on monitor stole stuff and was later apprihended.
This is one of 2 scenerios, 1- Government inappropriate level of security, or 2- Deliberate attempt to "leak" information or entangle someone. You can choose which one based on the level of your paranoia.
Cheers.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Phones
> room where the government employees are having
> their meeting?
Because per government regulations, the phones can't be in the same room where classified material is being discussed.
This isn't an issue of not wanting the meeting interrupted by ringing phones. It's an OPSEC issue because it's fairly easy for a hostile intelligence agency to turn your cell phone into a wireless bugging device.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Don't believe all the troll bait
The true allies were side-by-side with the US when it came to the invasion of Afghanistan, and tried very desperately to help the realize the errors in their reasoning for invading Iraq.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Rather than deal with the problem appropriately, they take a heavy-handed, blunt-force approach
If the content of the meeting is not enough to retain people's interest, then why hold the meeting? Or is it that the meeting is too long, too inefficient, too general?
Yep, don't address the root problem. Eliminate the competition. Sounds almost....corporate.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Should have used a courtesy box
That would have solved the problem. Morons.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
To David
Pretty simple and so far, effective.
[ link to this | view in thread ]