Can A Print Magazine Compete With Internet By Being Slower... But More Analytical?
from the depends-on-the-execution dept
The press is happily covering the news that some journalists are launching a new (paper) magazine called "Dispatches" by focusing on the supposed "contrarian" nature of the operation: it's focused on print, rather than the internet (though it will have an internet presence), and it's only going to publish once per quarter. The folks behind the magazine say they're trying to slow things down a little, and will focus on providing better analysis than the rapidfire approach of internet reporting. That makes sense -- but it's hardly new. Plenty of other press outlets have done the same thing -- and, realistically, the analyst business is based on this same premise (just with the idea that the content is paid for by companies receiving it rather than advertisers). Either way, even if the concept isn't particularly new, at the very least it's nice to see a magazine launch with a plan as to how to differentiate. That said, the differentiation is meaningless if it can't execute well and get people interested in the sort of in-depth content it hopes to provide.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: competing, internet, journalism, news, print magazine
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
short answer = no
long answer = noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
history repeating
Thank god he was right! Hopefully this internet thing will die soon. I can't wait to get back to waiting a day or two (or even a week!) before I hear the latest news.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
no, just because it is printed on paper
Internet sites already do this, they supply more and better? analysis on subjects for a price, it is called a subscription model.
Subscription Model:
comes from when Internet content was written down on paper (subscribed) and physically delivered on a regular schedule (daily, weekly, etc.)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Sure it can.
Provide a good product and people will read it, weather its on the net or in print.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
All The Kiddies.....
The under 30 crowd doesn't read papers, but there are still many over 30s that do. The NY Times, Boston Globe, LA Times USA Today and other dailies still print and still sell, albeit at a much lower level. There would certainly be a place for a news source that provides analysis, as long as it's balanced. If it's just another outlet for idealogues to promote their agenda - whether it left or right - it's probably going nowhere.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Why not...?
We'll have to see how it works.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
To Old Guy
I would not use the NY Times, Boston GLobe and the LA Times as examples in an article about talking about fact-checking.
The under 30s do not read news papers because the news gets to them a day late and extremally biased towards the ideology of the editor.
In the digital world there are too many different ways to 'fact-check' a biased news article and THAT is why the print business suffer.
For to long they had it all their way and now they suffer for it.
BTW, I am decades older than 30.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
uhh, hello, wake up, the point is...
The Delivery method is evolving to a faster and cheaper means. It is the cheaper delivery that marks the downfall of printed material. Paper media (newspaper, magazine, post/snail mail) cannot compete in cost with internet delivery.
There is still room for newspapers, magazines, books but the masses will eventually move to the most efficient least expensive method of content distribution. You cannot stop it.
Just as cave drawings replaced hand-waving;
Just as written scroll replaced oral history;
Just as printing presses obsoleted the transcribing monk.
Forcing people to use inferior distribution methods will only backfire, just look at the RIAA/MPAA/DRM.
Pissing people off is never a good long term business model.
People still talk with their hands, draw on walls, tell stories, write on scrolls and use a printing press as a form of recreation, as a hobby.
"The avalanche has already started, it is too late for the pebbles to vote."; Kosh, Ambassador to Babylon5.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
more analytical?
The main problem with print media, especially if they are only going to publish once per quarter, is that everything they print will be old news. We will have already moved on and will be done with the issues they present. We'll already know everything they include in the articles. Why would I want to pay for a printed, lesser, version of what I have right here on the internet?
If they print once per quarter that means that it would still be another 6 weeks before you could read about the cyclone in Myanmar, or the earth quake in China, and you would read about the next American Idol 4 weeks after they win the competition.
What's the name of this publication going to be, Recent History?
You will always gain more from information presented, dissected, changed, and rearranged by the masses than you ever will from information presented by the few.
But, hey, if you like reading old news just let me know. I'll print all the breaking news on the internet today and mail it to you a month from now for $10.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
room for both with a convergence strategy
Newspapers and magazines have the power to be the biggest internet portals on the planet ... yet publishers I have spoken with don't get the convergence thing. Had one newspaper exec state "we are still analyzing the relationship between our print readers and internet news readers!" Hello!! I would estimate over 90% of print readers under 50 also have access to the internet. It's not rocket science for a newspaper to tag a story on say a major fire ... Video and updates, type in the keyword: FIRE at ourwebsite.com. One column writer recently had the full URL to a Blu-Ray firmware update page ... the URL was 62 characters! Does the term "URL blindness" mean anything?
I enjoy reading a newspaper, would be nice if they realized that this Interweb thing is not a passing fad.
[ link to this | view in thread ]