The New Music Business: Enabling Musicians To Take Advantage Of New Business Models

from the nice-to-see dept

Tue, Jun 24th 2008 5:32am — Mike Masnick

It seems that whenever we write about various bands embracing new business models, one of the criticisms raised is this idea that we're somehow expecting musicians to also become businessmen to embrace these new models. Nothing could be further from the truth. In fact, we've pointed out that this is exactly the space on which record labels should be focused: helping musicians embrace these new business models, helping to handle the business and the technology, while the musicians focus on the music. Unfortunately, most major record labels still haven't figured this out, due to either legacy issues and contracts, an unwillingness to let go of old business models, or simple cluelessness.

Of course, the longer the major labels take to realize that this is where the market is headed, the bigger the opportunities there are for others to come in and fill that "enablement" gap. There are going to be more and more interesting startups entering the space. One that's starting to get some buzz is TopSpin, which just revealed its business late last week. TopSpin got some press a few months back by getting Yahoo Music boss Ian Rogers to join as CEO. We've written about some of Rogers' cogent writings on the music business before.

TopSpin isn't a record label, but it wants to basically enable all sorts of internet-based business models to work for musicians so that they can focus on making music. From the sound of it, that involves plenty of backend infrastructure, as well as front-end components, so that musicians can easily pick and choose custom, scaleable business models for their website with little effort. The company already has a nice headstart (and even some high profile customers). What may be most interesting, however, is to see how the business model opportunities evolve over time, as TopSpin may grow to have the best understanding of what business models really work, depending on what the circumstances are for the band. That could be incredibly powerful data by itself.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: business models, enabling, marketing, music
Companies: topspin

15 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 24 Jun 2008 @ 6:13am

Can they penetrate radio?
I wonder how effective TopSpin is going to be helping its artists penetrate the radio market. Radio is still a valuable tool for getting your music heard and getting your name known (despite what the labels say). It certainly isn't the only venue, but it is still an important one.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ima Fish, 24 Jun 2008 @ 6:15am

"this idea that we're somehow expecting musicians to also become businessmen to embrace these new models."

I don't think this idea is far fetched. If you want to become successful in any business, including the music business, you either have to become a businessman yourself or pay someone to do the business side of your work for you.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 24 Jun 2008 @ 6:18am

On the pessimistic side someone from either the *AA or a misguided musician is going to sue them.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Chump, 24 Jun 2008 @ 6:50am

Business
Business is business regardless of the model and we greedy, power-hungry humans always find a way to screw it up. This is no different than any other business.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
some old guy, 24 Jun 2008 @ 7:44am

Masnick's Law Invoked
This can only work for really big name stars or brand new musicians. This could never work for struggling in between.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Chiropetra, 24 Jun 2008 @ 9:20am

Re:
I don't think most people appreciate how much even moderately successful musicians are already business people. That doesn't mean you have to be totally business oriented, but if you're going to be successful you're going to have to have at least some concern for products, market, career planning, etc. That's always been true.

The opportunity here is that it will be easier to farm out the business part under the new models without getting raped in the process. And yes, "rape" is not a bad word to describe how the big record companies deal with musicians.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Matt (profile), 24 Jun 2008 @ 9:59am

like I said the other day
Like I said, marketing firms will end up helping with server hosting and things of that nature - something that not only is a legitimate business venture but also long-term.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Richard, 24 Jun 2008 @ 10:35am

Another Misleading Enterprise
So, is this really supposed to help all artists? Unless these tools are available to everyone it will just be more of the same old same old.

Take a look at the 'for artists' section...

"...Artists will be invited to join on an individual basis..." Really? How does that help the small artists?

or this one... "If you’re an artist ... and you have an existing fan base with an email list and a digital catalog, drop us a line at ..."

Come on! These guys could care less about helping out artists. All they care about is getting a commission on the sales of established acts. Booo! Bad bad record label mentality!

This is, again, a situation where *someone* (label or distributor or shop) makes a lot of money off of artists and the artists make squat. Same sh*t, different packaging. Seriously.

When will the real revolution happen with music sales models? When will artists truly get paid what they deserve for making our lives as rich and full of beautiful music as they are?

This can't go on for ever. Not unless all that anyone really wants to hear IS Banana Montana.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Niels Schroeter, 24 Jun 2008 @ 10:56am

Re: Can they penetrate radio?
There's a high price to pay for that shot at radio, which even the majors have a low batting average on. Furthermore, many bands get on the radio too early and experience public burn out before they get a chance to build a real fan base. Create something great, build it methodically, and radio will have to eventually pay attention.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
some old gy, 24 Jun 2008 @ 12:00pm

Re: Another Misleading Enterprise
This can't go on for ever. Not unless all that anyone really wants to hear IS Banana Montana.

Hey now, that's not fair. She is every bit as talented as her dad. Which would be not talented at all. So clearly, two generations of audience has said "yes, all we really want is that no talent stuff you got right there!"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 24 Jun 2008 @ 1:24pm

qxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxrtaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
[ link to this | view in thread ]
CalCajun, 24 Jun 2008 @ 5:03pm

RIAA
Why does't the recording industry look at the real facts of why sales are down. When music went to DVD's some years back, sales increased as everybody paid for the same music they bought on LP's or cassette or 8-traks so they could get it on DVD. As time passed now most people have bought alot of the music they wanted on DVD and now sales are down because there is no NEW format to make us buy the same music again on another format. They should get together with the hardware makers and find some new exciting format so that everyone will want to purchase the same songs again on this new format and they will be making money again.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
jonny twotone, 25 Jun 2008 @ 9:14am

Re: RIAA
Um, why keep buying the SAME MUSIC over and over again so you can give your money to the same companies over and over again? Ever listen to some NEW MUSIC????

The reason ppl aren't buying music is because the artists are telling the fans to steal it and download it. NIN, Smashing Pumpkins... Musicians make no money from music. Screw the industry, it should die so the artists can make the money that is theirs...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Dionicio Gonzalez, 25 Jun 2008 @ 11:16am

Quality Services for All Artists (Famours or Not)
My name is Dionicio Gonzalez, CIO and Co-Founder of NxSuperStar.In response to the comments about truly providing quality services that works for all artists (famous or not), NxSuperStar will introduce a business model that will do just that.

Without giving too much away, be prepared to tell anyone and everyone that the wait will soon be over. NxSuperStar is the next house hold name for all artists, representatives, service providers and consumersof creative arts. NxSuperStar is expected to launch Beta in Fall of 2008.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Doc Kane, 2 Jul 2008 @ 4:29pm

musicians can't be business-minded? Hooey.
Mike, thanks for the post. I would argue, though, that artists should, without a doubt, become better business people. After all, the record industry is a business, and there are countless tales of entertainers whose fortunes were laundered for them merely because they focused too much on music and not enough on business.

We all certainly need to play to our strengths and farm out what we're not particularly good at, but if entertainers in film, sport and music rely solely on others to do the business-side of things, they're asking for trouble. Record labels, agents, management firms, etc., are not baby-sitters, they're businesses -- and artists should not expect them to run their lives for them.

In my view, and I'm pretty sure this is TopSpin's angle, the firm actually enables artists to leverage technology in ways that actually DO give them a better handle on their marketing, their CRM and ultimately their sales.

The old Peter Drucker adage of "What gets measured, gets managed" is true, and if more artists, learned it and paid attention to their careers as if they were the CEO of their own band, they would be much more wise, wealthy and "in control" as a result.
[ link to this | view in thread ]