UK Gov't Tells ISPs They Need To Play Copyright Cops For Record Labels

from the due-process-means-nothing dept

Back in February, we noted that the UK government was putting a lot of pressure on ISPs to "voluntarily" agree to act as copyright cops for the entertainment industry -- sending out industry threat letters to users (often based on flimsy evidence) and even kicking off users who are "accused" of unauthorized file sharing three times (the infamous "three strikes") policy. While the government backed off a little, saying that it was up to the industry to work out the details, apparently the "tone" has changed and the government is back to putting serious pressure on ISPs to cave in to entertainment industry demands: "The British government just put a gun to our head," is how one ISP exec put it. That means they were basically told to give in or legislation would show up forcing them to give in. Chalk another one up for the entertainment industry lobby, effectively getting governments to protect an obsolete business model once again.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: copyright, copyright cops, isps, uk


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    mike allen, 24 Jun 2008 @ 1:27am

    Can thay

    tell the differance between a lagit bit torant say the BBC Iplayer which uses bit torrants or even a linux dist. or say kazaa / limewire i think not. but im hoping someone will tell me the answear to that.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. icon
    PaulT (profile), 24 Jun 2008 @ 1:42am

    "kicking off users who are "accused" of unauthorized file sharing three times"

    That's the thing that really worries me about this kind of thing. As noted many times, the RIAA have sued the dead, people who don't own computers and people who have never seen the files they were accused of sharing. Yet, we're suppose to believe that they and their UK counterparts are capable of correctly identifying them now?

    This will probably last until the first teleworker takes them to court for lost business after being falsely accused. Unfortunately, given the speed of trials that will take years. Meanwhile, the music industry will continue to decline because piracy isn't their actual problem...

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    IANAP, 24 Jun 2008 @ 5:18am

    Shiver Me Timbers

    How will this plan put money in the RIAA pocket ? There must be more to the story ..... like get kicked off and pay a fine.
    How is this sustainable ? Eventually everyone will be disconnected, but there will still be copyright infringement to battle - right ? By then the RIAA will just deduct the fee directly from your bank account, because it is too difficult to bother with due process and all.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. icon
    Killer_Tofu (profile), 24 Jun 2008 @ 5:28am

    Good points.

    I think the points that the others make above are extremely valid.
    If the entertainment industries themselves can't even keep track of what they own, let alone what is legit, how could they ever possibly expect the ISP's to do this?
    It is preposterous.

    If I owned an ISP, I would say sure, but only once the industry gives us the filters to check for these, and the instant it gives a single false positive, I will refuse to use it. Then I would set up many tests like those described above with legitimate torrents and such. Catches a single one of those, sorry, back to the drawing board for their filter. If the MAFIAA wants it, they should pay 110% of the bill, not the ISPs.
    How could it ever possibly be legal to force an entirely different industry to pay for your own failures to adapt?
    They must be buying politicians or something. Common sense alone defeats the industry on this one.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    SteveD, 24 Jun 2008 @ 5:39am

    About time

    Its about time this happened; bittorrent technology hasn't advanced much for a while now.

    Time for some new innovation to hit the piracy scene, and theres nothing quite like a bit of legal pressure to provide that.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    Iggy, 24 Jun 2008 @ 5:47am

    Exactly!

    "Time for some new innovation to hit the piracy scene, and theres nothing quite like a bit of legal pressure to provide that."

    Exactly right, SteveD. And this is the point that the RIAA just can't seem to comprehend. They are their own worst enemy.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 24 Jun 2008 @ 7:46am

    It's time the ISP's have a major power outage and shut down the entire internet for a few hours.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  8. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 24 Jun 2008 @ 8:15am

    Time Warner in San Antonio...

    Is making a half ass effort to do the same. I swear if I were dumber I could have been in charge of their effort. Wow just use open dns on the router and back in business. They tried unsuccessfully to stop torrent traffic. A 5th grader could outsmart the ISPs.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  9. identicon
    Shad, 25 Jun 2008 @ 11:43am

    Monopolies have power to fight the government demands

    Isn't most of the country served by BTnet? If I understand correctly having a monopoly in service gives companies leverage to fight government demands as long as the economies of scale are large enough to prevent small startups from instantly taking their place. Who really wants to pay to lay thousands of miles of their own OC cables?

    My point is, if the ISP situation is monopoly like and the government is making really stupid demands, it is easy for them to raise rates and send out emails to their customers explaining why they are raising rates and what the citizens can do about it (IE protest, write letters to the house of lords, ect). Explain that the government is forcing them to expand their bureaucracy and they have to pass the costs onto the customers.

    I think the hard part is getting into a monopoly position in the first place.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.