US Gov't: Do Not Carry Your Social Security Number; US Gov't: You Must Carry Your Social Security Number
from the mixed-messages dept
The classic concept of how to force someone to think for themselves rather than mindlessly obey authority is to have two equally powerful authority figures demand that the individual do the completely opposite actions (an example: having two top generals on either side of a low ranking soldier, one demanding he sit down, and the other demanding he stand). Somehow, though, I doubt that's the reasoning behind conflicting messages coming from the US government concerning whether or not you should carry your social security number on you. Jim Harper points us to the fact that the Federal Trade Commission has suggested it's not wise for American citizens to carry their social security number with them in their wallet -- yet other government agencies seem to require it.Medicare and the Defense Department each issue cards with the person's SSN included. Medicare seems particularly conflicted about the whole thing. It refuses to get rid of cards with SSNs, saying that "it would be too expensive." Instead, in order to deal with the risk of identity theft over this issue, it suggests that you only carry the card with you when you think you might need it: "don't carry it with you unless you know you're going to need it." In other words, always make sure to properly predict that heart attack or stroke ahead of time so you know to carry the card with you. Of course, Medicare also publishes a conflicting pamphlet that reminds people: "Carry your card with you when you are away from home." Mixed messages indeed.
Then, of course, the FTC also recommends that you not write your social security on any check, as that's an easy way for ID thefts to get a hold of it. Of course, on the other side, you have the IRS, who asks taxpayers to write their social security number on the checks you send in. So will the FTC now go after Medicare, the Defense Department and the IRS for helping to cause identity theft? Somehow I doubt it.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: government advice, identity fraud, social security number
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Godwin's Law:
Black Dog - "Sir, your papers?"
Schmo - "I don't seem to have them on me..."
Black Dog - "You'll have to come with me for several hours uncomfortable hours of questioning, in which pain will be used as an incentive to answer quickly and truthfully. Luckily for you, however, there will be no torture."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Finally, an issue I totally agree with you :)
Happy 4th!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
VA also can't afford the conversion
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: national ID number
The next step? National ID, the step after that? Chips inserted at birth
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: national ID number
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: national ID number
Metal Gear!?!?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
How to avoid SSN on checks to IRS
Don't send them any checks.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: national ID number
They'd be the same thing...
Remember, never attribute to malice that which can easily be explained by ineptitude.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: I-9 requirements
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: How to avoid SSN on checks to IRS
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: I-9 requirements
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The only person getting super strength off that is the super strength the government will have over you at that point.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: national ID number
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Mixed messages?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Nice find Mike
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Treasury requires it to get in the building
Even says so on their web site.
They should know better :-(
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Yea...
/sarcasm off
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I don't think they have any idea
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Memory
My only question to those saying they don't carry it is; what if you are unable to give it?
If you need it for medical reasons you may not be conscious when you get to Emerg.
I have a Health Card and provincial ID, neither of which have my SIN printed on them.
Though the ID's use a Master # that probably equates to the same thing.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
DoD Is taking steps.
Our SSAN is our primary means of identification. I'm still not happy about that. The sheer volume of paperwork generated by even lowest ranking soldier/sailor/airman/Marine means that my SSAN is seen, transcribed, submitted and written down by literally dozens of people. My favorite is the Privacy Act Statement on the travel voucher. (Paraphrasing) "Submitting your SSAN is voluntary; however you will not get paid without including it."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Gov't IDT Practical Advice
Second, the US government has absolutely no plans to change its current identification method. As Mr. Masnick correctly pointed out, "It's too expensive." More importantly, what would they change it to? (Re: Anonymous Coward)
Third, Identity Theft cannot be prevented. You as an individual can only minimize your potential for becoming a victim. So what does your identity theft prevention plan consist of? Monitoring? Resolution? RESTORATION?
Fourth, when (not if) you start looking at identity theft prevention services I hope you will contact me for an intelligent conversation on the subject.
[ link to this | view in thread ]