Lawyer Seriously Slapped Down For SLAPP Attempt Against Librarian Blogger

from the ouch dept

Thu, Jul 3rd 2008 1:28pm — Mike Masnick

We've covered the concept of SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) suits plenty of times before. These are bogus lawsuits filed to try to bully a critic into shutting up. In one such case, involving an incredibly broad subpoena against a librarian blogger compiling information on the potential link between mercury and autism, a magistrate judge has seriously smacked down the lawyer who filed the subpoena. The blogger had merely published on her blog information about the fees the lawyer in question had received. In response, the lawyer subpoenaed a ridiculous amount of information from her: "all documents pertaining to the setup, financing, running, research, maintaining" of the blog, "including communications with representatives of the federal government, the pharmaceutical industry, advocacy groups, non-governmental organizations, political action groups, profit or non-profit entities, journals, editorial boards, scientific boards, academic boards, medical licensing boards, any 'religious groups (Muslim or otherwise), or individuals with religious affiliations,' and any other 'concerned individuals.'"

The judge quashed the subpoena quickly, but has now hit back really hard on the lawyer, Clifford Shoemaker, for filing it in the first place:

Shoemaker has not offered a shred of evidence to support his speculations. He has, he says, had his suspicions aroused because she has so much information. Clearly he is unfamiliar with the extent of the information which a highly-competent librarian like Ms. Seidel can, and did, accumulate. If Shoemaker wanted to know if Ms. Seidel was in part supported by or provided information by Bayer, he could have inquired of Bayer or limited the Seidel subpoena to that information. Instead he issued the subpoena calling for production of documents and a deposition on the day before he stipulated to dismiss the underlying suit with prejudice. His failure to withdraw the subpoena when he clearly knew that suit was over is telling about his motives. His efforts to vilify and demean Ms. Seidel are unwarranted and unseemly....

I find that Clifford Shoemaker violated Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b)(1) and Rule 45(c)(1).... The 11(b)(1) violation may also violate Virginia's Rules of Professional Conduct .... Clifford J. Shoemaker’s action is an abuse of legal process, a waste of judicial resources and an unnecessary waste of the time and expense to the purported deponent.

The Clerk of Court is directed to forward a certified copy of this order, the motion to quash, the show cause order, and the response of Shoemaker and Seidel to the appropriate professional conduct committee of the Virginia State Bar in order that it may be made aware of Clifford J. Shoemaker's conduct and so that those authorities may take whatever action they deem appropriate.

As a sanction from this court, Clifford J. Shoemaker is ordered to attend within three months, a continuing legal education program on ethics and on the discovery rules in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. He is ordered to file a certification of completion of the programs.

Now that's a smackdown.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: bloggers, ethics, lawyers, slapp, subpoena

36 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Poster, 3 Jul 2008 @ 1:49pm

I think Ron Simmons said it best: "DAMN."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 3 Jul 2008 @ 2:10pm

pwned!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ragaboo, 3 Jul 2008 @ 2:24pm

We'll all sign it!
Can we get that judge's mailing address? I think we should get a thank-you card and all sign it and send it to him.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
DS78, 3 Jul 2008 @ 2:24pm

Steps to the front of the crowd....
...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
DS78, 3 Jul 2008 @ 2:26pm

Steps to the front of the crowd...
...slow claps.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 3 Jul 2008 @ 2:28pm

Well it's about time somebody put a lawyer in his place. Hopefully this will set a good precedent for future similar abuse of our legal system.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Valkor, 3 Jul 2008 @ 2:32pm

Re:
When a judge reports you to the State Bar, you're definitely pwned.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 3 Jul 2008 @ 2:33pm

Now if only someone did the same to the RIAA lawyers... :/
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Norm, 3 Jul 2008 @ 2:35pm

Re: Steps to the front of the crowd...
... joins the applause.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
eleete, 3 Jul 2008 @ 2:39pm

Re:
Amen !
[ link to this | view in thread ]
teknosapien, 3 Jul 2008 @ 3:02pm

Holy crap
Buy that Judge a case of 12 year old scotch !!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
jypsy, 3 Jul 2008 @ 3:40pm

"involving an incredibly broad subpoena against a librarian blogger compiling information on the potential link between mercury and autism"
I think "compiling information on the lack of a link between mercury and autism" might be a more accurate description of Ms. Seidel's work.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Clueby4, 3 Jul 2008 @ 3:43pm

Lowered expectationsL
Slapped down? I don't think so, mildly inconvenienced and embarrassed perhaps. How about a nice big fine, disbarment or some jail time, to me that would be a slap down.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
4byClue, 3 Jul 2008 @ 4:23pm

Raised expectationsL
I think he's probably referring to how well the judge presented the decision, not necessarily the decision itself.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
anne, 3 Jul 2008 @ 4:27pm

People 1: Sharks and bottom feeders: 0
SMAACKDOWN!!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 3 Jul 2008 @ 4:47pm

Re: We'll all sign it!
I'll be the first to sign it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Eric the Grey, 3 Jul 2008 @ 5:17pm

Re: Re:
... and THEN sends you back to school!

Truly schooled. :p

EtG
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Milodon, 3 Jul 2008 @ 5:36pm

Let the courts know!
You can submit a survey regarding the judges performance here!! http://www.courthouseforum.com/forums/evaluationtrial.php?id=537&which=judge
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Tony, 3 Jul 2008 @ 5:45pm

We nee more...
..Judges who think and rule like this.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
clapless, 3 Jul 2008 @ 6:37pm

Re: Steps to the front of the crowd...
"...slow claps."

er... gradual onset of VD?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 3 Jul 2008 @ 8:41pm

I think the lawyer should have gotten the information that he asked for. The judge was obviously paid off by the blogger and her contacts.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 3 Jul 2008 @ 11:45pm

And free speach wins.
This judge, I would totally hug in public. THANK YOU FOR BRINGING THE WIN. SLAPP suits are filled with lots of Fail.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 3 Jul 2008 @ 11:46pm

Re:
Why? there is no reason to ask for that info BUT to intimidate and restrict freedom of speech/the press. Which, BTW, is designed to prevent corruption and public blindness to corruption. Honestly, we need more of it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The i-Team, 4 Jul 2008 @ 1:21am

Buuurrrrnnnneeeddddd....
Kinda makes you feel all warm and fuzzy inside doesn't it? :-)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
ToySouljah, 4 Jul 2008 @ 2:44am

Re: Re:
I thought he was being sarcastic...lol. I read it in a sarcastic way and it sounded better to me since it is usually the little people that get crushed by lawyers and their high dollar clients.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Sean, 4 Jul 2008 @ 3:21am

Re: Let the courts know!
Great, done it, all "A"s except the "don't knows".
Need more judges like this.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
BTR1701, 4 Jul 2008 @ 7:02am

Re: Lowered expectationsL
> How about a nice big fine, disbarment or some jail time,
> to me that would be a slap down.

A judge doesn't have the legal authority to disbar an attorney. Only the state bar can do that.

As for the fine/jail, a judge can only do that if the lawyer has met the elements of criminal contempt of court, which filing an overbroad subpoena does not do.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Dooley P., 4 Jul 2008 @ 1:59pm

Don't mess with the gravy train
'Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b)(1) and Rule 45(c)(1).... The 11(b)(1) violation may also violate Virginia's Rules of Professional Conduct.'

Should've known. The oldest one in the book.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Steve, 5 Jul 2008 @ 11:52am

BWAAAAHAHAHAHA!
OWNED!! In a nut shell, the Judge called the lawyer out as a hack, and ordered his ass back to school. He's also implying that the State bar should sanction him as well. Funniest thing EVAR!!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
mkam, 7 Jul 2008 @ 4:49am

Re: Re: Steps to the front of the crowd...
...applause building and quickening in pace.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Killer_Tofu (profile), 7 Jul 2008 @ 6:27am

Beautiful
Score 1 for the public.
Very glad to see this. Very glad indeed.

I will join in the clapping, card signing, and I am going to fill out that review the judge survey thing.
Woot!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 7 Jul 2008 @ 7:07am

Awesome
Now why can't he be the judge for some of these frivilous **AA suits filed by sleezeball lawyers! Nothing like seeing a lawyer literally schooled!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Denzien, 7 Jul 2008 @ 8:51am

Re: Lowered expectationsL
I believe the judge did everything in his power without overstepping his authority.

It will be up to the Virginia Bar Assn. to penalize him further. They will likely fail in this endeavor...but again, disbarment is not up to the judge.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Scott, 8 Jul 2008 @ 3:39am

Re: Lowered expectationsL
"The Clerk of Court is directed to forward a certified copy of this order, the motion to quash, the show cause order, and the response of Shoemaker and Seidel to the appropriate professional conduct committee of the Virginia State Bar in order that it may be made aware of Clifford J. Shoemaker's conduct and so that those authorities may take whatever action they deem appropriate."

Hmm, this would look like the beginning of disbarrment procedure.

Oh and the bit about continuing education in ethics, etc. is hilarious.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Scott, 8 Jul 2008 @ 3:43am

You think the Virginia Bar will notice this?
"The Clerk of Court is directed to forward a certified copy of this order, the motion to quash, the show cause order, and the response of Shoemaker and Seidel to the appropriate professional conduct committee of the Virginia State Bar in order that it may be made aware of Clifford J. Shoemaker's conduct and so that those authorities may take whatever action they deem appropriate. "

I think the fact that it comes from a sitting judge will ensure that they at least look at this guy.

I suspect the lawyer will be teaching ethics to pre-law students in some community college in 5 years.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Liz Ditz, 12 Jul 2008 @ 9:50pm

Two new Seidel posts on Shoemaker's, uhm, professional conduct
I was one of the bloggers named in Shoemaker's subpoena, which is my dog in the hunt.

You may find Seidel's two latest posts of interest. I've included the first paragraph of each extensive and detailed post.

Billing the Adversary

http://www.neurodiversity.com/weblog/article/165

Numerous decisions issued over the twenty year history of the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) document the extent to which the limits on attorney compensation have been tested by practitioners seeking remuneration from its taxpayer-financed coffers. The following review summarizes decisions involving the recently-sanctioned VICP specialist Clifford Shoemaker, Esq. -- a central instigator of the campaign to convince the public of the speculative, scientifically unsupported hypothesis that a significant number of cases of autism result from vaccine injury, co-founder of the Institute for Chronic Illnesses, and a founding member its Institutional Review Board, which sponsors and provides ethical oversight of medical research and experimentation on autistic children and adolescents conducted by his long-time colleague Dr. Mark Geier.

Inspecting the Outstretched Palm

http://neurodiversity.com/weblog/article/166/

The potential for procedural and billing improprieties by Vaccine Injury Compensation Program petitioners’ attorneys — especially those representing numerous clients with similar, speculative claims — is made painfully evident in Special Master Denise Vowell’s recent fee and cost decision in Carrington v. HHS, Case 99-495V (Fed.Cl.Spec.Mstr., June 18, 2008) (unpublished), posted to the U.S. Court of Federal Claims website three days ago.
The content of these two posts is possibly what Shoemaker intended to block with the quashed subpoena.
[ link to this | view in thread ]