Jim Prentice Wishes People Wouldn't Be So Specific In Their Questions Over Canadian Copyright Law
from the wouldn't-life-be-better-if-we-were-all-vague-in-our-criticisms? dept
It would be mildly amusing to watch how Canadian politician Jim Prentice was squirming away from any serious discussion around his new copyright bill, if it weren't such a serious issue. After Prentice was forced to delay the bill originally planned for late last year, he promised to consult with all parties before coming out with a better bill. He did not. Instead, he just kept waiting, making minor changes, and then announced the bill at a time where he hoped it wouldn't garner that much attention. However, it has received plenty of attention from people asking a bunch of questions, and Prentice's response has hardly been compelling. If anything, he's made it abundantly clear that he doesn't want to actually discuss the specifics.Michael Geist discusses the various tactics Prentice has used to avoid actually dealing with the massive shortcomings of the bill, including hanging up on radio interviewers and now saying that he won't answer the questions being raised until it's debated in Parliamentary committee. But, perhaps the most ridiculous of all is that Prentice's chief of staff is complaining that the complaints and questions about the bill are "too specific." Apparently, they were hoping for vague questions that could be brushed off with vague answers. Unfortunately, an awful lot of people (not, apparently, including Prentice) understand the terrible impact this bill would have and would like him to respond to those concerns. Prentice, apparently, doesn't like that line of "specific" questions and will hide behind the Parliamentary committee (and his ability to hang up) rather than answer them.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: canada, copyright, jim prentice
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Typical
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Vancouver meeting tomorrow
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Canadia?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
if you have any questions for mr prentice
Constituency Office
Suite 105
1318 Centre St NE
Calgary, Alberta T2E 2R7
403 216-7777
Fax 403 230-4368
Prentice.J@parl.gc.ca
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
and sueed every1 who did.
PS Mike its CanadiaN copyright not Canadia
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So typical of conservative govt members
I can't wait to have Canadian citizenship to vote this slime out.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Did he even write the legislation?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Did he even write the legislation?
If you read it you'll find that it grants things to lobby groups like the RIAA and MPAA and their Canadian branch plant groups "rights" they're still fighting for in the United States.
Including criminalization of copyright violation and trying to establish reverse onus in those cases. Never mind the Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that reverse onus is a constitutional violation going back to Magna Carta and therefore invalid.
In short, it tries to do things which are unwise, at the very least to unconstitutional at worst.
The long and the short of it all is that Prentice doesn't want to talk about it or want us to talk about it.
Nor, I suspect does he want it in committee either because of the coverage that will most definitely get and he can't just hang up the phone on a committee.
The Senate won't be overly friendly, either, and that's a good thing.
(Mark this because I have very few good things to say of that chamber of sleepy cronies.)
Voting the Tories out won't change much because the Grits are just as bad.
The federal NDP would have to get its collective head out of the clouds and stop mourning the loss of Stalinism. Not to mention the rampant paternalism of their upper class and upper middle class notions that it knows better than the poor and working class about what the less "fortunate" actually need.
So the only option we have as Canadian citizens is to raise utter hell and make sure this piece of crap dies on the order paper as it so richly deserves.
ttfn
John
(For readers outside of Canada Tories = Conservative Party and Grits = Liberal Party.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Scumbag
And don't bother sending Prentice a letter or email, it falls on deaf ears. I've sent a few, sending in various problems from copyright to telecom's, and never got a response. If you really want to get someone to listen to you in Canada, send your emails to an NDP representative, they are about the only one's who actually care about the people these days.
I hope Prentice gets shot in the head, then run over by a bus, then shot in the head a few more times, then run over a few more buses, just to make sure he's really dead. Might want to burn what's left for good measure. Scumbag.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Scumbag
If he gets enough letters, he'll realise that this is an issue that could cost his party the next election, and he'll quietly put this bill on the back-burner (and let his colleagues in the trade department push ACTA through instead).
The NDP already have a sensible position on copyright. It's the rest that need convincing (particularly the Bloc right now).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
He doesn't have a clue
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Jim Prentice's Background
Jim "has specialized in property rights". But not INTELLECTUAL property rights.
Jim "was Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development and Federal Interlocutor for Métis and Non-Status Indians".. which gives him zero experience as minister of industry, or copyright laws.
and finally, Jim is a conservative.
It is not hard to see why he is so clueless about current copyright laws and technologies.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
*sigh*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]