ACLU Sues Over New Surveillance Act
from the ain't-over-yet dept
Following Congress granting President Bush the "get out of jail free" card he demanded, it probably comes as no surprise that he's signed the bill into law -- claiming (laughably) that the bill was designed to "protect the liberties of our citizens." It's unclear what in the new bill does that -- though there's plenty that does the opposite. Almost immediately, the ACLU has sued to challenge the constitutionality of the bill, saying that it appears to violate the 4th Amendment against unreasonable search and seizure without probable cause. Meanwhile, the EFF is also preparing to sue over both the telco immunity issue and the expanded surveillance powers. All of these efforts are probably long shots, but it means this isn't over yet.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: fisa, surveillance, telco immunity, wiretapping
Companies: aclu, eff
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I agree with others who have said that the terrorists did not win on September 11th, 2001, but they did on July 9th, 2008.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sign the ACLU's ad
https://secure.aclu.org/site/SPageServer?pagename=Are_you_angry&s_s=aclu_FISA0708__web
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sign the ACLU's ad
http://www.aclu.org/fisaaction
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Sign the ACLU's ad
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Sign the ACLU's ad
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Sign the ACLU's ad
Sooo, did you click on the little link that was for the one time donation? Or did you accidentaly just fill in the first form, which is for a monthly subscription, so to speak? Hope you picked whichever you were going for. The one time donation link was rather tiny. But at least it was before the amounts for the monthly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
OMG - WHO THE @#%^&* do they think they are?
I want to know how Google, AT&T and Yahoo et all have to say about this
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: OMG - WHO THE @#%^&* do they think they are?
"That'll be $13.50"?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Excuse me, Mr. Secret Agent
Once again, Sorry to waste your time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Time to get a clue
You write foolishly: "claiming (laughably) that the bill was designed to "protect the liberties of our citizens." It's unclear what in the new bill does that -- though there's plenty that does the opposite."
WRONG!
Get Educated:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/C?c110:./temp/~c110IqRMxH
Techdirt is turning into dirt with such morons like this spouting off when they don't know what they're talking about.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Time to get a clue
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Resumes too!
Any takers? I'll mortgage everything I have to find a bookie in Vegas to run this. Can't get better odds than this, and I want to become a millionaire before this is done.
PLACE YOUR BETS!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This issue finally got me to give money to the EFF
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Time to get a clue
[ link to this | view in chronology ]