Trent Reznor Continues To Show Different Ways To Connect With Fans
from the send-'em-on-a-treasure-hunt dept
Back when Trent Reznor was still signed to Universal Music, he tested out his own form of a promotional campaign for his latest album: he started hiding USB keys with songs off of the album in the bathroom at his various concerts. Fans would find the USB keys, bring them home and upload the songs -- making it into a huge event, generating much more interest around the album. Now that he's independent and testing out all sorts of interesting business model experiments, he's also doing plenty to connect directly to his biggest fans. Take, for example, this story in the LA Times about Reznor hiding concert tickets around Los Angeles, under rocks and in drainpipes, and then putting up coordinates and clues on the Nine Inch Nails website, sending fans racing across the city to see if they can find the free tickets. While it may be a little silly, it is yet another way for Reznor to build up a really loyal fanbase. He's making being a fan fun. Sure, it's not for everyone, but it's certainly adding value to the "true fans" that support Reznor.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: business models, concerts, fans, music, nine inch nails, trent reznor
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Go Trent!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
geocaching with rewards
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Masnick's Law
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Masnick's Law
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Masnick's Law
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
idea
[ link to this | view in thread ]
fan fun
That's why people become fans of bands (movies, artists, etc) - because they enjoy it. As soon as you make it difficult to enjoy (high prices, lawsuits, restrictive policies), people won't have fun anymore.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
So that's what it's like to use an insecure operating system. Thanks for the refresher, I havent had windows as my primary OS for almost 2 years now. It's awesome to not have to compute in fear.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
fun
Great ideas will draw the interest of the public.
Keep it going...................
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
clever tricks...
I've been trying to get in touch with bands to see about arranging blood drives along the East Coast... this is a volunteer effort, due to the dangerously low levels of 'inventory'...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Condemning artists to a lifetime on the bus and/or making T-shirts will pretty much kill off certain types of bands, but will keep some graphic artists employed. Until folks start sharing vectorized graphics so you can make your own T-shirt at Cafepress for a pittance. So much for income from those $40 concert tickets. Some of my favorite bands never tour. BAM, so much for that.
I'm no more of a fan of DRM than anyone else, and I think the RIAA pretty much sucks and should be replaced with something more reasonable. But not paying musicians to create music (but instead make T-shirts) and coders to create code (but instead sell coffee mugs) will lead to the production of great T-shirts and coffee mugs, not great music and code. Might as well value film-making by how much soda it makes the audience buy kids' toys for the inevitable product tie-in.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
That's what disposable virtual machines are for..or Live CD's :-)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Nonsense!!
You bunch of freeloaders!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
I'm not secure in my superiority, I am confident in my os's security. There's a big difference there. Nobody said OSX was perfect, but we OSX users dont have to live in fear of a USB drive.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
If the AC's post weren't so long it could almost be used in the encyclopedia as an example of a logical fallacy.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Ya, see... That's actually one of the benefits.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Nonsense!!
Because, we aren't willing to accept your terms. so either you accept ours, or you dont get paid at all.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Now that's awesome. Next we'll hear about how maybe it works okay for the small bands and the huge bands *and* the middle bands -- but not for the ones in the cracks in between.
You keep making exceptions until you discover the exception is the rule.
But not paying musicians to create music (but instead make T-shirts) and coders to create code (but instead sell coffee mugs) will lead to the production of great T-shirts and coffee mugs, not great music and code.
Who said anything about not paying musicians to create music? We've said exactly the opposite. You absolutely should pay musicians to create music. But that doesn't mean you sell copies of the music -- you sell the creation of that music. Take a look at what Jill Sobule and Maria Schneider have done (and I'll note that Sobule probably fits much more into that "middle" category you insist this model doesn't work for).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The worst problem with the whole issue is testability - everyone has hypotheses (you, me, everyone) about economics, but there's little experimental proof, with control groups and all. How would you, for example, prove that LadyTalk would sell more with free music than without? It's a toughie. No, not arguments - Aristotle argued that heavier objects should fall faster and everyone bought that for quite some time because nobody bothered to look for proof. I would love to be proven wrong and find out that people aren't basically greedy scum and that you can make it with a little fanbase.
You might have a better chance convincing folks to change by using evidence, rather than hope. Right now, you're asking folks to accept, on faith, that this will work out for them at all stages. Labels and the RIAA suck, but it is a devil they know.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
So, the urine coating, or possible dummy device (short circuts are fun!), are protected by your magical OS?
Who freakin mentioned windows?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: bite down.
I'll be buying their next album, but certainly not yours.
Have fun starving on your own sense of importance.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Not at all. We are telling them the revolution is coming, and that there will be many casualties. They can choose to adapt and have a chance to survive, or they can choose to not adapt and the end will come quickly.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Of course not. Because that's a dumb business model. No one will pay you that way.
But, if you were to actually take the time to understand the model we're discussing, you would use various social networking sites to build up fan appreciation of your music. Do some local shows -- and then start small. Try to raise a much lower number to produce that first "scrappy" album. Then promote the hell out of that -- build up a large community, and charge more the second time around.
Jill Sobule, she's a known quantity. Not well-known, for sure, I've only heard one track aside from "The Secretive Life" and "I've Kissed a Girl." People will probably pay for Sobule to make music, but not an unknown artist. The hostage model fails for them.
Weren't you just saying that the model worked for small and big, but not middle. Then I give you an example of a middle artist using it, and suddenly it's "but it doesn't work for small artists."
Yeah. Okay.
The worst problem with the whole issue is testability - everyone has hypotheses (you, me, everyone) about economics, but there's little experimental proof, with control groups and all. How would you, for example, prove that LadyTalk would sell more with free music than without? It's a toughie
It's just basic economics. You are adding an infinite resource to an economic pool. That will expand the pool. That's what infinite resources do. The trick is making sure you set up the right system (i.e., business model) to capture a piece of that expanded pool.
I would love to be proven wrong and find out that people aren't basically greedy scum and that you can make it with a little fanbase.
Well, your first problem is calling them greedy scum. Maybe if you started treating them right it wouldn't be such a struggle for you.
You might have a better chance convincing folks to change by using evidence, rather than hope. Right now, you're asking folks to accept, on faith, that this will work out for them at all stages. Labels and the RIAA suck, but it is a devil they know.
Which evidence is missing? We've pointed to plenty of evidence, big and small, showing that adding an infinite resource makes the economic pie bigger -- we've showed many examples (big, small and midsized) of bands putting it into practice. We've explained the exact mechanics of how to capture that larger pool.
And yet you claim we're asking you to take it on faith?
Some people just don't want to learn.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Trent
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Trent
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Your headlines are basically "free free free." Maybe you could draw out exactly what kind of free you're supposed to be using when. Differentiate a bit.
And Jill Sobule is not proof. She's one person. She's an anecdote. You know what they say that the plural of anecdote is? Well, it's not "data."
What you need is a bunch of Jill Sobules. And not just doing it for one album. You can convince someone to do something for one album - will she do it again? Is it succcessful for a population? I'm not suggesting she have a gold-plated toilet or anything, just enough to "make a living." Do control groups.
I'm basically skeptical. What you're doing is selling something - a product, Product B. Now, the customer has been using Product A and knows a lot of other people using Product A. They aren't crazy about it but they kind of know what to expect. You're selling this alternative method, Product B. The customer can clearly see the benefit - to you - but the benefit to them is quite a bit fuzzier. They don't get how Product B works. It's counterintuitive, and it's a big leap.
Pretend you're "selling" this business model to musicians (which you are). They can see that the fans love free stuff (everyone loves free stuff), but they're not sure how that love of free stuff translates into getting their gas bill paid.
That's why I suggest something besides handwaving economics and some anecdotes. Build a plan for them, back it up with some proof. Just quoting some basic economics doesn't prove squat - our recent economic stimulus check is an excellent example of something which, in theory, has an economic benefit that doesn't show up in the real world.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: #32
I buy my music, btw, always have. Call me crazy, but I do. A lot of people do. Getting started in an artistic career is no harder than it ever was (one could argue that the internet and P2P actually makes it easier). But I cannot buy music if I've never heard it. I won't hear it if someone keeps it under lock and key and cover charge and strangling law.
Do you want to be heard or do you want to be paid? One needs to come before the other, and until then we all need to keep our day jobs.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
You mean like this one?
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070919/230654.shtml
"No One Ever Said Free Is The Business Model -- But It Absolutely Should Be A Part Of The Business Model"
Or this one?
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20071214/034002.shtml
"Once Again: No One Says That 'Free' By Itself Pays The Bills"
Or this one?
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080522/1545021204.shtml
"'Give It Away And Pray' Isn't A Business Model... But It Doesn't Mean That 'Free' Doesn't Work"
No, I don't just talk about "free, free, free" but explain the business models and how to make money in rather great detail:
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20030912/1032238.shtml
http://www.techdirt.com/articles /20070503/012939.shtml
It's tough to argue against strawmen.
Once you've actually read what I wrote, then I'm more than willing to discuss. If you want to argue against what you think I wrote, then it's a waste of both of our time.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: #32
[ link to this | view in thread ]
indies connecting with fans with quality hip hop beats
http://www.beatslocker.com
and they are totally hit major sound and great quality hip hop and rap beats. That was never available before....So that side is covered where as before only the major labels had access to these producers.. I already have airplay and Uni has contacted me! But in the end it would be nice to stay indie and keep the cash...all that remains to conquer is promo and marketing.. distribution is even covered .... when that happens majors are truly over!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]