Putting Metadata In Video For Search Purposes? Patented! Microsoft Sued
from the it-never-ends dept
The last time we wrote about a small company called Gotuit Media, it was in 2003, when the company was suing TiVo for an excessively broad patent about recording TV while playing back TV concurrently. Apparently, the company is still in the business of suing other companies that are putting obvious ideas into practice. For example, it's now suing Microsoft over its implementation of Silverlight-based videos for the Olympics on NBC's website. Microsoft's crime? Apparently the videos are going to include some metadata that will make them searchable, allowing users to search and find specific content. And, that, according to Gotuit, is patent infringement.Of course, that's ridiculous. If you were to tackle the problem of how to create a search engine for video, one of the first things just about any competent programmer would think of is adding text metadata to the video that would then be used for search. But, thanks to the patent system, apparently you can only do that if you've agreed to pay Gotuit a licensing fee.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: metadata, online video, silverlight, video
Companies: gotuit, microsoft
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Any links to the actual patent?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
My Patent
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Any links to the actual patent?
http://www.google.com/patents?id=3ZmfAAAAEBAJ
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Any links to the actual patent?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
How did they get this patent?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Another pertinant patent
http://www.google.com/patents?id=T2QKAAAAEBAJ&dq=6368227
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Unordered
Seems all that is needed for this case to fail is to show that the descriptors are unordered.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
join us now and...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
anyway...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Patents and Microsoft
Also, Microsoft was given a Trade Mark for Window - how stupid is that? It was already a common term in the industry and therefore should NOT have been allowed to trademark the name Windows.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: anyway...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Another pertinant patent
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Any links to the actual patent?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: My Patent
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: join us now and...
ttfn
John
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Another pertinant patent
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Where are the patent defenders?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: anyway...
Instead patents are increasingly used by small litigation houses to extort the larger corporations who find it cheaper to simply settle, license or pay royalties than to screw around in court for months or years on end fighting it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Where are the patent defenders?
If this patent is as overly broad and obvious as some here claim it is, then it's a problem with the USPTO, not the patent system itself. Pro-patent folks, such as myself, realize that there are serious problems with the USPTO's patent examination process that need to be rectified. An honest debate about whether the patent system is good or bad shouldn't bring up shitty patents such as this one.
Besides, attempting to enlighten the minds of stubborn programmers is an excercise in futility.
[ link to this | view in thread ]