300,000 UK Motorists Say GPS Lead Them Into Danger -- But Not All Of Them Followed
from the if-your-gps-told-you-to-jump-off-a-bridge,-would-you-do-it? dept
Drivers in the UK seem to really have a problem with completely relying on GPS navigation directions. But it's hard to believe the headline that GPS devices caused 300,000 crashes for motorists across the pond. Based on a quick search, the UK's Department for Transport reported less than 500,000 traffic accidents in 2001 on all the roads in the UK. So unless the number of traffic accidents has skyrocketed over the last few years, it would seem that GPS devices are to blame for a significant number of vehicle accidents. (It's not clear over what time period those 300,000 GPS-caused accidents occurred -- but presumably those 300,000 crashes didn't start happening in the 1980's.)However, the UK poll actually says that one in fifty UK drivers -- about 300,000 motorists -- blames GPS for causing or nearly causing an accident -- which is hardly the same thing as GPS devices causing 300,000 accidents. But even so, if the poll numbers are accurate, it also seems amazing that there isn't a follow-up headline regarding a class action lawsuit against these "dangerous" GPS devices. Clearly, there are a sizable number of drivers who need more reminders that automated directions are not 100% reliable. Given the somewhat saturated GPS device market, maybe more safety features should become a differentiator -- instead of novelty Knight Rider voices and navigators disguised as teddy bears.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: dangerous driving, gps, uk
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
"Put the satnav where it won't interfere with your view of the road. If it's not positioned correctly, stop in a safe place and adjust it."
Apparently they're expecting people to be reading this article while they're driving down the street.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Common Sense?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Common Sense?
I got a GPS device for Christmas and, to be honest, it took me a bit to get used to using it. It's a little computer screen right there in your car and what do you do with computer screens? Well, you look at them. It took a while to develop a habit of timing my glances at safe(r) times.
To be clear, I'm not excusing people for running in a lake because their GPS device told them to (a la The Office), but I would have to agree with Mr. Ho that makers of GPS devices should attempt to differentiate themselves through safety features.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
@Hulser
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: @Hulser
I respectfully disagree. Your comments seems to imply that taking responsibility for ones actions is mutually exclusive to understanding the cause of certain behaviors. If you get into an accident because you were watching your GPS screen instead of the road or because your GPS device "told you" to go the wrong way down a one way street, then of course it's your fault. You are personally responsible for that action. However, this doesn't negate the fact that the human brain is hardwired in such a way that it's sometimes difficult to divide one's attention between between the road and devices like this, or that people tend to place too much trust in computers and electronic devices. So, yes...you can have personal responsibility, but still know your customer well enough that you can add in some safety features that will help people get used to a new way of driving.
(For example, it's common sense that if you want to reply to this comment, you'd click the link that said "(reply to this comment)", but some people instead choose to use contrived conventions like the "@".)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: @Hulser
- If you think a GPS is that dangerous, why do you have it in your car?
- There are hundreds of distractions while you're in a car, from your mobile phone going off to the kids in the back car to the CD skipping in your stereo. Most of us manage to avoid accidents by ignoring those distractions, why do you think people are incapable of doing the same with GPS? Do you also stare at TVs in shop windows as you drive past because you think you're "hardwired" to do so?
For me, it comes down to think: a GPS is an incredibly useful tool for navigating unfamiliar roads, especially if you don't have someone else in the car to read a map. However, many people seem to either use them for what should be familiar journeys (instead of actually memopising the route) or blindly follow what the GPS says instead of trusting their own eyes.
*That's* the problem. there are unfortunately idiots on the road, and I get the feeling that people blaming GPS units for these events are probably the same ones who didn't think that talking on the mobile or fishing around for a CD on the floor were dangerous either. I'd also say that the numbers are probably vastly exaggerated - not just by the article itself including near-misses, but by the claims of drivers themselves. Talking on the mobile while driving = illegal, looking at the GPS instead of the road = debatable. Most people would rather chance the possibility that the GPS claim might not be considered dangerous driving, than admit to something that's specifically outlawed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: @Hulser
Where did I say that GPS devices were "dangerous"? Answer: I didn't.
why do you think people are incapable of doing the same with GPS?
Where did I say that "people were incableable of doing the same thing"? Answer: I didn't.
What I did say is that the safety concerns around GPS devices in cars is more complicated than an application of common sense. Common sense can tell you one thing, but your natural reactions can tend towards something altogether different. All that I'm saying is that a better understanding of why many people blame their GPS devices for near accidents is a better approach than just saying "use common sense". And, getting back to the point of the original TD article, that the makers of GPS devices can differentiate themselves from other companies by adding safety features rather.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Do Not Use It
If you crash your vehicle then be an adult about it and do not blame some silly techno device.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
@LTDLP
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RE: Common Sense
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Common sense
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Common sense
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What about other distractions?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Real Cause?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]