New York Politicians Think About Repealing Amazon Tax, But Let It Drop
from the so-much-for-that dept
Back in April, we noted that some NY state politicians were trying to put in place a rather sneaky legal change that effectively would force Amazon to collect sales tax in New York, despite not having a physical presence there. The "trick" was to claim that if you had any affiliates in the state, you had a local presence. Affiliates, of course, can be nothing more than an advertiser. So, based on this change of law, effectively anyone who has an advertiser in NY is considered to have a local presence there and must collect sales tax. Both Amazon.com and Overstock have sued over this law, and Overstock has even gone so far as to cut off all NY affiliates in response (showing how the law probably hurts NYers a lot more than it helps them).Saul Hansell, over at the NY Times, picked up on an odd fact, however. Just weeks after this passed, a separate bill was introduced to repeal it. Yet, that bill appeared to have no sponsor, but the state Senate actually voted and approved it. After some digging, Hansell got an explanation: saying that the original bill was part of a larger bill that was approved, but many felt that they wanted to address just this specific issue. Of course, it appears that the state senators' interest is not matched by the corresponding state assembly (who would also need to pass such a bill). Over there, they'd just as soon leave the matter as is, and let the courts (and taxpayers) sort it out.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: affiliates, amazon tax, new york state, tax
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Anti-Bundling Bill
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Anti-Bundling Bill
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Anti-Bundling Bill
The bundling doesn't force legislators to vote in ways they don't want to -- it just reflects compromises they've made, which would be the same compromises if the bills were separate. A legislator wants low taxes for Amazon customers but even more wants a new highway. So he agrees to support taxing Amazon sales in exchange for his colleagues supporting the highway.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
@Bryan Henderson Re: Anti-Bundling Bill
Ummm, no. It's almost always much harder to repeal a law than it is to pass one in the first place.
In this case, somebody apparently went out of their way to sneak it through. I wouldn't want to depend on that to work every time.
"Laws are like sausages -- it's best not to see them made."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
buy new pc
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Visalus lifestyle
[ link to this | view in chronology ]