Diebold/Premier Actually Admits Its Machines Are Faulty! And That It Lied About Antivirus Software...
from the wonders-never-cease dept
Consider me to be in a state of shock. For nearly half a decade Diebold has always responded in the identical way to every single report of a problem or security vulnerability with its e-voting machines: attacking those who pointed out the problem and claiming it really wasn't a problem at all. This has happened time and time again that I'm not even sure how to react when the company (renamed Premier to get away from the Diebold name stigma) has finally admitted that its machines have a flaw that drops votes. Oops. It's warning 34 states that use the machines of the problem which was highlighted in the lawsuit Ohio filed against Premiere/Diebold. Not only that, but it's admitting the flaw in the software has been in the software for the past decade.So, uh, why was the company blaming anti-virus software just a couple months ago?
It should also make us question Premier/Diebold's longstanding claim that independent outsiders should not be allowed to inspect its machines for problems. Of course, Diebold execs are already downplaying all of this, claiming that they were "confident" that this hadn't actually impacted any elections, though they offer no proof of that. The company's president admits he's "distressed" that they were wrong in their previous analysis, but he fails to explain why the company is so against letting outsides inspect the machines to avoid such flaws. In the meantime, the company insists that the problem will be patched in time for the November election, and I'm sure we're all confident that there won't be any other problems with their machines, right?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: e-voting, security, vulnerabilities
Companies: diebold, premier voting
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
51% Mccain, 49% Obama.
then I'll wonder if the cell phone video from the post election closed-door senate hearing where the guy says he was paid to write a program to flip an election 51% 49% is legit.
this is way too fishy for the basis on which our government stands, IMHO.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ive often wondered . . .
Considering the unbelievable incompetence combined with their penchant for lying, secrecy and the inability to face any criticism, make me wonder why none of Diebold’s executive leadership were appointed to important positions by the Bush Administration.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Ive often wondered . . .
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Maybe the media wants the populous to think it's neck-and-neck race- this has the potential to make good TV ratings in the short term, and opportunities for recounts later on.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I think you missed the point (seems to be a common problem for Bush supporters)? It seems to me that the incompetence displayed by the executives at Diebold (somehow they can’t get a computer to count?) makes them perfect candidates as Bush appointees (since incompetence seems to be their top criteria). I wasn’t saying anything about costing anyone an election? Are you using those "cut and paste comebacks" from McCain’s website (aka sheep bites), because I think you used the wrong one here?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Personally, I like to poke fun at anyone who allows a party platform to do their thinking for them.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
DOES NOT MATTER: Popular vote does not win the election
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The US has always been about money and the rich.
The free-Slavery movement was supported by North because it cost too much to house a slave - it was cheaper to given slaves freedom and then charge them rent! In the South it was cheaper to have slave as the housing cost (due mainly to heating cost) was way lower. Lucky for us the economic thing to do was the right thing to do.
The rich get richer and hire marketing and PR people to make sell us on it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
What Amazing Timing!
Could it be so that the media will ask fewer questions following the election? I think so. I can already here the post-election press room discussion: "We aren't going with another Diebold story, they admitted they had a problem and corrected it, There's no story there... what's Paris Hilton up to?"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: What Amazing Timing!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Tombstone Blues..
You will not die, it's not poison"
And you want to spread democracy in middle east......ROFL
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Your criticism of my assuming his support for Bush is fair enough I think. However, you seemed to totally miss the point about "cut and paste" responses. His post was out of place in response to my comment (read it, it makes no sense in the context it’s used). He used the often cited standard Republican “deflect” to questions of Diebolds complicity in election shenanigans in Ohio. It’s the standard "sheep bite" about democrat derived ballots in Florida. The problem with his use of this particular "cut and paste" come back here though, was I made no statement about any Diebold election shenanigans, so it made no sense. Why I felt his post might be a "sheep bite" was not that I didn’t like its content, but that it simply made no sense in the context it was used.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: What Amazing Timing!
Whoever the next president is, has an opportunity to change some or all of that, so IMO it is one of the most important elections ever.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Ive often wondered . . .
Do you remember some of this?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Thank you, its not often in political forum discussions that anyone will admit to being wrong about anything. What you say about Florida may be true, but Im not a "lib", just an American. Im also not a Democrat (I live in a state that respects privacy in party affiliation), however I dont know exactly what is wrong with thier nomination system? Except for having a few more super delegates and less "winner take all" primaries they both do it pretty much the same way?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Listen...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Listen...
Regarding Diebold, The Onion has this covered:
http://www.theonion.com/content/video/diebold_accidentally_leaks
It's pronounced "Deebold", but whatever...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Ive often wondered . . .
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: DOES NOT MATTER: Popular vote does not win the election
First, the EC is in the Constitution, and thus would require a bit more than a 'law change' to undo.
Second, the President is chosen by the Electoral College which is comprised of Electors chosen by each state as they see fit. The number of Electors per state is determined by population plus two (# of Representatives + # of Senators).
Every method to choose those Electors entails a popular vote of the population at one (or many) stages of the process.
So, one need only manipulate the outcomes in a few states to swing an entire Presidential election. In the past, manipulating an election required the involvement of many complicit people (i.e. well funded large conspiracy). With electronic voting, it's conceivable that a single well-placed agent can fix an election in such a way that might be impossible to detect, much less prove.
Back to pen and paper. It's the only way. Stakes are way way too high.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: What Amazing Timing!
In fact, I'd argue that the late 60s to early 70s had it worse than today...not by much, but worse.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: What Amazing Timing!
And to answer the "why now" question: just imagine if they had waited until December, or worse, stuck to their denials until the Ohio lawsuit exposed them as frauds. I don't know about you, but I'm sick of hearing "if they hadn't stole it from Gore" sheeple-speak, but I'm resigned to the fact that it'll be said until the end of time. If the 2008 outcome is disputed, at least they won't be completely to blame.
It's never too late to pass out blank index cards and pencils in a public setting a count those votes in another public setting, with the ballots never leaving public view. Yeah it might be expensive having to pay people for their time instead of depending on the few retired citizens who bother volunteering, but it'll be cheaper in the long-run.
How Premier (Diebold) can possibly survive this a vote-tabulation-device business is a mystery.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
holy crap
[ link to this | view in thread ]
It soothes everyone
I predict that Obama is going to win. Even if we have a perfect, lossless system in place, Obama will win because people are sick of what the current Administration has done. At this moment in time, this country can't take another Bush, and there'll be rioting in the streets if McCain wins.
Now, by admitting that the machines are faulty, all the liberals get to yell "See, see, we were robbed!" But it won't matter, because it's not like there's a paper trail to prove it, and our status in the world won't improve by it.
They've claimed that everything will be fixed by November. So now, everyone, not just the liberals, will be suspicious. I mean, now that they've admitted it, the conservatives will now have their own seed of doubt planted about the upcoming election.
And then, when (not if) McCain loses, the conservatives will be able to say: "How do we know the machines were ready? We've been cheated, we've been cheated!" They won't take to the streets (they haven't had 8 years to build up their anger) but they will store this unease for future reference.
Obama will be walking a tight-rope is entire presidency anyways, and every little mistake (or big, who knows) will be eagerly recorded by the right, so in 4 years they'll come back with the left's own rhetoric, pointing out his failings, and reminding everyone about the questionable results of 2008.
So unless Obama pulls off a miracle (unlikely), he'll get his 4 years, and 2012 will really be something to see.
Either way, Diebold keeps making money, cause governments aren't asking for something else, they're asking them to fix it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: holy crap
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Votes
If you really are concerned about your vote don't focus on the anomaly. This is the same company that makes your ATM machine. Are you ready to go back to the days when you can only get cask on weekdays from 9 to 5?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Diebold Accidentally Leaks Results Of 2008 Election Early
[ link to this | view in thread ]
RE: How hard can it be
The issue is operator error not realizing the flash memory with the votes is not fully loaded. This is nor an application problem. If someone yanks a hard drive or memory during an update executing the finest code there would be data loss.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Ive often wondered . . .
All a bunch of liberal lies!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Ive often wondered . . .
Diebold is just automating the process.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: RE: How hard can it be
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Ive often wondered . . .
1. Republican caging lists denying a LOT of people their legitimate right to vote.
2. Republican election officials (who were willing to cheat by changing vote totals after hours once the reporters were gone.)
&
3. The Supreme Court overriding a ruling that should have been left to the Florida State Supreme court that cost Gore. Telling us that time was of the essence; that we could not afford to wait a few days for the recount.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
If you're talking of the people, by the people, for the people - it's called socialism. Fantastic new concept, works wonders in other countries; check it out.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Ive often wondered . . .
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
what a joke
I every vote counted we would reform the voting process: PAY PEOPLE to assist with the act of voting instead of relying on volunteers to do a shitty job of it. Don't let a company with political ties run the voting machines. Don't let political attack ads form peoples view of candidates.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
America is a 1 party two fraction fools democracy The latest characters are McCain and Obama, go watch the punch and judy puppet show between Obama and McCain, who are both cleared through the CFR with Zbigniew Brzezinski the author of the grand chessboard and rothschilds agent being a founder of the TLC acting as foriegn policy advisor. Do not look at the head behind the curtain..Its the American 1 Party - 2 fractions puppet show, its fools democracy. instead of controlling one party and upsetting people with undue influence, they control two and you feel like you have a choice and make a difference, what you have is two fractions acting in concert in a feudalictic fashion as part of the illusion .. Its Chocolate or Chocolate Flavour i am afraid, Remember its also not who votes that matters, is who counts the votes that matters.
American people do not chose their president, they chose from two candidates put up as being alternative, but both have to agree to continue the same agenda to get the shot at the top job. Its today known as the "Quigley Formula". Caroll Quigley was invited into their inner circle to act as historian, he agreed with their plans for world domination but did not agree with there secrecy, he revealed all in a book called "Tragedy and Hope"
Presidents are Selected not elected, do not look behind the curtain !!
Kennedy wanted to get rid of them out of American politics and released this speech asking for help from the American people, they got rid of him, Cant blame them though, they got him in there and he rolled on them Have you heard it? 2 minutes long
MUST WATCH http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ngJNIk8elA
He also brought out real USA backed currency, non Federal Reserve (private company) currency and had released lower denominations, all withdrawn within 4 mths of his Assasination
See the CIA pull back his bodyguard detail 100m away from the kill zone
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XY02Qkuc_f8&feature ...
Only way to end Americas current problems is to VOTE INDEPENDENTS only and end party politics, also take back your money system and abolish the worlds only state sponsored terrorist group, the CIA, any other organisations are tools and assets .. Probably will never happen and they have won already, which if thats how it is, thats fine, but no more lies about democracy ( fools democracy for control) for the world ... its all about control and money, the worlds banks all belong to Rothchilds and friends as agreed upon in the 1800's
Owners of the Federal Reserve:
1) Rothschild Banks of London and Berlin 2) Lazard Brothers Bank of Paris 3) Israel Moses Sieff Bank of Italy 4) Warburg Batiks of Hamburg and Amsterdam 5) Lehman Brothers Bank of New York 6) Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York 7) Chase Manhattan Bank of New York (controlled by the Rockefellers) 8) Goldman Sachs Bank of New York
Bring on the New World Order, its happening now with the latest merger being NAFTA, they hide it in trade agreements and we saw the EU grow out of the european economic council. in time, all will be merged together.
People are so stupid and deserve to be ruled by a inner circle of parasites, people will loose their soveriegnty and nationalism, bring it on, just be aware they are calling for population controls and reductions, up to 80% through war, famine and desease..
The CIA is the new world orders tool and available to USA corporate interests for a price...
VOTE INDEPENDANTS and you have a very small chance, then again your number one enemy is the media censorship
19 men in a cave versus US military/intelligence machine? hahaha Yeah Right! .........................................
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Diebold
So..when theres a problem (lets say maybe err..
the UPCOMING ELECTION!!!!),they won't get as much heat "WHEN"
and I say "WHEN.. things go wrong, because they already admitted it.
But of course, no one is REALLY to blame now is there?
These things can happen with a new technology right?
Yeah...that's the ticket..We'll just steal another election for the republicans then say..OOPS...MY BAD!!
Didn't we already tell you the machines were f#cked up?
Heh heh heh
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: What Amazing Timing!
"..education system is a joke"... why, how DARE you criticize the wonderful state controlled education system. Next thing you'll be saying is its the Teacher's union fault. Mind control by the liberal left is a wonderful thing!
"..no comprehensive energy plan"... yes, we most certainly do. We have monopolies selling us oil (OPEC comprised of entire nations taking money from us) yet we pursue the 5% of the oil provided by Exxon and the like calling for confiscating their businesses (nationalizing the oil industry), or taking any profits they make (about 5%) while the government rakes in about 15% in taxes. Yes, punish the job providers, the oil producers and the risk takers. We're MUCH better off having the same people who gave us FEMA, the Corps of Engineers and the state sponsored educational system running the oil industry too! That's a GREAT strategy!
"..healthcare system is on the most inefficient and costliest in the world"... Right again. What a terrible system where people flock here from all the better medical systems, like England and Canada, to get our overpriced, inefficient and terrible healthcare. Again, we need the same people who gave us FEMA, etc. to manager our healthcare. Ask anyone in socialist Europe which system they'd rather have!
"..social security"... it has always been the responsibility of the gub'ment to make you save for your retirement. And, if you do save, they double and triple tax you on it, and then don't pay you back what you put in. You can't even invest what you put in in what you choose to invest. Rather, we have them invest it for us at an average 2% return. Yes, the lifestyle you deserve in your retirement (if you count on social security instead of self reliance) will be what you deserve.
"..politics of fear"... great way to close. Read your post. Its all about you trying to instill fear. You offer no solutions. You deserve what you will get.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
umm . . . America has really had basically a two party system since before we declared independance (we had loyalists and revolutionists). During the creation of our own government, we had a fight over strong central government versus state held power (federalists versus anti-federalists). These two parties morphed into the modern Republican and Democrats we have today.
While I agree that there is largely no real tangible "idiological" difference between them anymore (they both believe in a gigantic all powerful central government), I dont believe there was any decision made in 1900 to do something that had been already around for 100 years at that point? Also, it was what 1912 when TR ran on a third party ticket for president (Bull Moose)? Did they not invite him to the meeting?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: What Amazing Timing!
Learn to think for yourself and maybe you wouldn't be so bitter. You are welcome to move to Canada any time. I hear Sweden will let anyone live there now, you don't even need to get a job.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: What Amazing Timing!
Yes Hussien was a nasty guy who ran a nasty regime. This was true in the 80’s when Ronal Reagan called him “one of our closest Arab allies” and still true when Donald Rumsfeld was lobbying congress to get biological weapons to him. The issue is not whether Saddam was a nasty criminal, he certainly was (even back when conservatives in this country loved him). However, he had nothing to do with 911, AlQuida or the militant Islamic terrorism movement they were pushing at all really (they were as much a danger to him as to us). So spending vast resources going after him made our country weaker by ignoring the funders of terrorism (Saudi Arabia) and the harborers of terrorism (Pakastan – both of whom the current president has described as “close allies”).
". . . why, how DARE you criticize the wonderful state controlled education system. Next thing you'll be saying is its the Teacher's union fault. Mind control by the liberal left is a wonderful thing!"
The public education system in America is a microcosm of the nation itself. If you live a prosperous area where education funding is a priority, then you have some of the finest public education available anywhere on the planet. If you live in an impovrished area (most urban areas for example) where resources and priorities do not provide sufficiently for education, well then your just out of luck.
"... yes, we most certainly do. We have monopolies selling us oil (OPEC comprised of entire nations taking money from us) yet we pursue the 5% of the oil provided by Exxon and the like calling for confiscating their businesses (nationalizing the oil industry), or taking any profits they make (about 5%) while the government rakes in about 15% in taxes. Yes, punish the job providers, the oil producers and the risk takers. We're MUCH better off having the same people who gave us FEMA, the Corps of Engineers and the state sponsored educational system running the oil industry too! That's a GREAT strategy!"
Where I think we differ here is your belief that the problem is just America’s dependence on foreign oil (from the Bush family friends the Saudis who apparently just can’t control OPEC alone anymore) and no recognition of the problem of oil dependence in general.
" . . . Right again. What a terrible system where people flock here from all the better medical systems, like England and Canada, to get our overpriced, inefficient and terrible healthcare. Again, we need the same people who gave us FEMA, etc. to manager our healthcare. Ask anyone in socialist Europe which system they'd rather have!"
Most Europeans I know (I have to assume you dont actually know any?) truly pity Americas Healthcare system (we are what, last in infant mortality among industrialized nations, yet we spend the most money by nearly 100%? How is that possible?). Like education the American Healthcare system is a totally different experience depending solely on what economic stratus you happen to inhabit. If your wealthy enough to stroke a check for services rendered by a healthcare provider, then you have access to some of the finest healthcare available on the planet in America. However, very very very few people can afford this, especially in America. If you need insurance to help you pay for services, then you have access to fairly mediocre healthcare in the United States. It’s the most expensive in terms of cost but really pretty average when compared to modern industrialized nations. Lastly if you are too poor to have insurance, America is a substandard third world country when it comes to healthcare. Do you think people die in European emergency rooms awaiting care . . . they do in America. We are number one in procedurally preventable deaths of all industrialized nations, number one. More people die in the United States from the lack of proper care then in any other industrialized nation (yet once again we spend money then anyone else, by tons). There seems to be a lot you don’t know about the American Healthcare system, be glad you don’t, it’s a pretty scary industry at the moment. If you think healthcare in America is so great I suggest you look into “Medical Tourism” and ask yourself why Americans would want to go to Mexico, Panama, Brazil or Malaysia to get treatment.
"it has always been the responsibility of the gub'ment to make you save for your retirement. And, if you do save, they double and triple tax you on it, and then don't pay you back what you put in. You can't even invest what you put in in what you choose to invest. Rather, we have them invest it for us at an average 2% return. Yes, the lifestyle you deserve in your retirement (if you count on social security instead of self reliance) will be what you deserve."
Social security is what makes the Republican s method of big government big spending possible. The Government simply lumps that money into the general fund and uses it to help make up for the budget-taxes shortfall (there is no retirement savings account, it’s a myth, it never existed). FICA allows the American worker to be taxed disproportionately without him even knowing it. Why did I pay 30+% of my income in taxes in 2001 and Dick Cheney only paid 12 to 18% of his income in taxes? FICA my friend that’s why, the secret tax on the working man.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: holy crap
[ link to this | view in thread ]