Amazon Granted 1-Hour Offer Patent

from the order-now! dept

theodp writes "Amazon was awarded a patent Tuesday for its Interactive Time-Limited Merchandising Program and Method for Improved Online Cross-Selling, which appears to be lawyer-speak for presenting customers with one limited-time offer after another until they finally bite on one or decline them all. So be careful - the next time you offer folks 10% off on a garden rake if they purchase it within sixty minutes after declining to buy a saucepan, you could be guilty of patent infringement!"
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: ordering, patents, time-limited
Companies: amazon


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    John Duncan Yoyo, 3 Sep 2008 @ 7:47am

    Been There Done That

    Fails on prior use timed deals were done at K-Mart in the seventies. Anyone remember a Blue light special?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    hegemon13, 3 Sep 2008 @ 7:59am

    Re: Been There Done That

    But...but...Amazon is doing it *ONLINE*!

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 3 Sep 2008 @ 8:03am

    No More WootOffs?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Patent Whore, 3 Sep 2008 @ 8:10am

    Sorry...

    I have patented the idea of patenting obvious ideas. They are clearly infringing!

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    y8, 3 Sep 2008 @ 8:20am

    woot

    The woot off is not dependant on whether you take action on a previous item, and it is not time dependent, it is product availability dependant.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    UUUD444, 3 Sep 2008 @ 8:39am

    Patents in general

    I personally think all software-based patents should be dissolved. For one thing, like this one, they tend to be way too general. Seriously, offering a new item up for sale on a cyclical basis? How is that a unique idea?

    Further, I think any patent covering an item that is not currently in production should be dissolved. Patenting an idea to prevent it from being formed by someone else, while doing nothing with said patent is a practice that should be stopped.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 3 Sep 2008 @ 8:58am

    The patent covers a system and method that is much more nuanced than simply a string of time limited offers (e.g., HSN, QVC).

    link to this | view in thread ]

  8. icon
    edgebilliards (profile), 3 Sep 2008 @ 9:11am

    software patent?

    is this a software or a business method patent? i'm not super-knowledgeable, but it kinda walks the line b/w the two.

    the code to offer sales is a little obvious, but the idea of doing it is kinda sorta not so much so.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  9. identicon
    SoyChicken Little, 3 Sep 2008 @ 9:30am

    Read the patent details...

    ... and you will see that it's fairly well defined and pertains to their use of goldbox daily deals which I think is unique and patent-worthy. They put a lot of time and research into developing it, and I don't think it would be fair for other online e-commerce entities to straight copy it.

    Yes I agree that there are some software patents that are so generically defined that they are meaningless, but in fairness, I don't think this is one of them.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  10. identicon
    StrawMan, 3 Sep 2008 @ 9:54am

    Re: Read the patent details...

    You know what else was innovative and worthy of a patent by those standards? The online shopping cart, rubber wheels, pneumatic tires, a digital volume control, speedometers that show both MP/h and KM/h.

    OOH! I'll patent the fuel gauge that shows both gallons and liters so you know how much you'd be getting screwed if you had to pay by the liter.

    This is fun. I'm going to find other things that people are doing, but a minor, but fairly obvious twist on it and patent the hell out of it...or stop trolling...whichever.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  11. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 3 Sep 2008 @ 10:06am

    Re: Re: Read the patent details...

    "Strawman" is an apt moniker since you appear to be quite adept at creating irrelevant and inaccurate strawmen.

    As the subject title notes, try reading the patent before waxing poetic on what you seem to feel are failings of the current law.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  12. identicon
    Innocent Gosling, 3 Sep 2008 @ 11:42am

    Re: Read the patent details...

    Goldbox Daily Deals?

    What is that, like, "free nude pic of the day"?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  13. icon
    ChurchHatesTucker (profile), 3 Sep 2008 @ 11:53am

    Re: Been There Done That

    "Anyone remember a Blue light special?"

    Or the "Limited time offer! Call now!" commercials that have been around since at least that long? (Granted, I doubt they actually time those, but the concept is clearly there.)

    Where the hell do they find these patent examiners?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  14. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 3 Sep 2008 @ 12:00pm

    Re: Re: Been There Done That

    the zoo pays them to take away the ugly monkeys.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  15. identicon
    JT, 3 Sep 2008 @ 12:36pm

    Re: Read the patent details...

    Oh yeah they put millions of hours into taking another persons idea that's been around for a long time and expanding on it.

    Don't get me wrong I have found myself almost solely relying on Amazon for a large portion of things I buy and even have Prime. It just amazes me that there are Kool-Aid drinkers in every crowd even Amazons.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  16. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 3 Sep 2008 @ 3:18pm

    Re:

    I was thinking the samething

    link to this | view in thread ]

  17. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 3 Sep 2008 @ 8:39pm

    Re: Re: Re: Read the patent details...

    "Strawman" is an apt moniker since you appear to be quite adept at creating irrelevant and inaccurate strawmen.
    Perhaps you should learn what a straw man argument and sarcasm are and the difference between the two so that your comments don't appear to coming from a complete idiot.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.