GAO Notes That Election Officials Not Informed About E-Voting Problems
from the don't-you-feel-safer? dept
By now, it's pretty difficult to deny that most of the e-voting equipment out there has problems. We've covered so many stories of e-voting problems, covering all of the major e-voting machine suppliers, that there's a pretty major problem out there. So what are election officials doing about it? Not much, apparently. A new report from the Government Accountability Office (GAO) notes that the Election Assistance Commission hasn't bothered informing election officials around the country about all of the problems associated with e-voting machines. And, to make matters worse, a separate report from Common Cause claims that 10 states that had problems in the last election haven't done anything to fix those problems. Given all of the stories we've had recently about e-voting problems, this is hardly a surprise, but one more reason to wonder who's actually in charge on these sorts of things?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
2000/2004 Repeated. 100% Guaranteed.
Why that would be the Donetta Davidson!
A little history first:
As Secretary of State for Colorado, she spearheaded the horrible, virtually non-existent, Colorado e-voting certification process. Based on her experience, Donetta Davidson who was named by George W. Bush as a commissioner of the U.S. Elections Assistance Commission. Davidson's duties at the EAC include overseeing federal certification for e-voting systems across the entire nation.
When reading today's article from Common Cause, do note Colorado is listed as one of the ten states that had problems in the last election. Donetta's certification process were tossed out upon her taking the new job in Washington by the new Secretary of State... Donetta's replacement nonetheless.
This resulted in de-certification of virtually all voting machines. ( http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/19/us/politics/19voting.html )
All this leads to a potential repeat of of "President by Judiciary Committee", similar as seen in 2004, but on a larger scale. Considering Donetta's reputation in previous jobs, and knowing, first hand that Republicans are gearing up for battle, I can't wait until mid-2009 when I know who the President is.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKgPY1adc0A
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Failure of federal standard
In my voting precinct, they still use an "old" mark sense form system. You get a paper ballot, fill in a box next to your choice using a pen, then you feed the ballot into a optical reader machine which reads the form, and stacks the read ballots in a secure hopper. An alternative would be to use a touch screen computer to select your choices, then the machine would print out a completed paper ballot, which would then be signed by the voter and read by the optical reader. If the election needs to be recounted, all they have to do is feed the completed paper ballots back through the reader. A lot better than the punch card system with hanging chads.
There is little incentive to hack the system since the paper ballots exist as a backup. Of course you have to protect the paper ballots against tampering, but nothing's perfect.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
the I'm too busy Dept
So how could one not know there were problems, got your head in the sand ? Do they not read the news paper or surf the web ? Who are these people and why are they so ignorant ? What other duties do they have that would be more important than providing for a problem free election ?
There really is no excuse for this. The only conclusion that I can come up with is that they want the machines in place so that there will be the same problems as last time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Easy and Secure
Tell attendant your name and address.
They look you up on a list, and you sign.
They give you a paper card, you mark your votes, you place it in a locked box.
It is later hand counted.
Hand counting doesn't take long (hey herds: think distributed computing), and should always, always, always be an option - never trust the machines. If someone wants to vote electronically (old people who can't figure out chads), just give them a touch screen that prints out a physical ballot that they turn in.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Huh?
Seriously, our priorities are so out of line.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
BULLSHIT
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: BULLSHIT
What could possibly go wrong ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: BULLSHIT
eVoting has come and gone, and there's still *A LOT* of problems that it seems no one can identify root cause, much less fix it by November. Virus Scanners changing votes? Come on. Any reasonable CS major could tell you a Virus Scanner only targets known treats.
It's laughable that it's gone on this long.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: BULLSHIT
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RE
Is it an accident that the majority of the machines manufactured (by Diebold) are made by a corporation that has republican ownership. Let's see, oh that is so distrusting, people just would not do such things, I must be some misguided liberal. Uh huh.
And now... tax payer money being allocated to bail out the Wall Street gambling society, PLEASE!! Hey, I spent money in foolish ways too, where's my bail out? Oh, I got 600 bucks... HAHAHAHAHAHA!!
It does not get any clearer than that. If McCain doesn't get elected it will be a miracle... because those folks who are behind the scenes and really in charge need puppets like Bush and McCain spouting christian beliefs and security... it is truly amazing to me that people buy that malarkey.
It seems to me we are too far down the path of greed to get back and the constant distractions and deal making and back stabbing at all levels of government can hardly be unwound. It would take a lot of people with ethics and morals like no others to make that a reality. That is why there could not be a focused effort to make sure voting at least looks legit. I would love to be wrong! I believe in the principles this country was founded upon... it may be time for a REVO... oh, I could be arrested and detained indefinitely as a terrorist for suggesting such ideas.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Comic Relief
I just voted in the Federal election in Canada to choose a new parliament and prime minister. The waiting line was about five people. I stepped up to my polling station, identified myself and a nice lady found my name on the list of electors, crossed it off and handed me a ballot. I voted with a pencil. Done. They called the winners about six hours later.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]