Apple Shuts Off Loophole For Podcaster App Developer; He Switches Over To Android
from the pissing-off-developers dept
We noted that Apple had recently started banning any kind of competitive app from the iPhone App Store, saying that various iPhone developers must be eagerly awaiting the launch of Google-powered Android phones. And, indeed, that seems to be the case for the developer of the Podcaster app, who has announced that he'll now develop the app for Android phones instead. The final straw, apparently, was Apple closing the workaround he was using to get the Podcasting app to users -- and doing so with no communication or explanation whatsoever. Apple may believe it can get away with treating developers this way when there's no serious competition in the marketplace, but they may discover that pissing off your developer community has pretty long-term negative consequences when that competition actually arrives.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: android, app store, applications, competition, iphone, podcaster, useful
Companies: apple
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Apple trying to control app developers is like Microsoft trying to control suck.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Hmmm
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Seen this before?
Lets Review: Apple comes out with a superior product steals the show, lets no one program for it and wants to make all the profit from the applications, competitor comes to market with similar product and allows anyone to program for it, competitor gains 75% market share because it has a collection of better and cheaper apps.
Wait for one year and let the Android Capable phones to come to market and give the programmers time to make some super cool apps for the Android phones, then sell your Apple stock.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
competition
Please let me know when that happens.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Apple
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Calm down
Nothing in this post is intended to support DRM, but a contract is a contract as between Apple and commercial content suppiers to the iTunes store.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Calm down
Nothing in this post is intended to support DRM, but a contract is a contract as between Apple and commercial content suppiers to the iTunes store.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Calm down
The app in question has nothing to do with DRM or "commercial content suppliers." The app is a podcast downloading app, that allows freely offered up podcasts to be downloaded.
What does DRM have to do with any of that?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Calm down
The 'legal' issues are at the heart of it all, listen to the 'spasm' responses. Clearly the majority believe open is better because of the 'legal agreements'.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
If an application does not breach Apple's terms in the agreement, the application should be sold in the App store. These developers spend lots of time to create these products, and to make sure that they don't breach the stated agreement. If Apple wants to make up rules as it goes along, it's wrong. If the application was designed without breaching the rules, and gets rejected by Apple anyway, it's wrong.
Imagine if the rules were the same on Apple computers. No Firefox......because Apple makes Safari. No photo applications like Adobe Lightroom because Apple makes iPhoto (and Aperture).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Calm down
As a consumer, I couldn't flippin' care less about any computer manufacturer's contracts for any of their side businesses. I buy COMPUTING HARDWARE and I DEMAND it run the software that I CHOOSE. You need to STOP THINKING that devices like the iPhone are somehow in some magical special class of product that does not have to play by the rules of the market place for general purpose, network attached computing devices. If Apple were to impose the same software functionality restrictions it has on the iPhone to their line of desktop or notebook products, their customer base would rightly revolt.
Smart handset makers...I AM YOUR CUSTOMER, not the mobile network operators. Design me in maximum capability and speed for my dollar with an open software architecture and the iPhone's "Golden Formfactor" and you will be handsomely rewarded with my loyalty.
Mobile Networks Operators...Please try to understand this before one of us dies. YOU SUCK AT COMPUTER AND SOFTWARE DESIGN and UNDERSTANDING the NEEDS of your CUSTOMERS. You are quite simply no god-damned good at it and you foul up every product you take a hand in. Please, please have the wisdom to focus your energies on building standards based, higher and higher speed networks and providing access to them using the DEVICE OF MY CHOICE. Provide decent coverage at a reasonable price and you will prosper.
OK...I've calmed down now.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Calm down
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Atari
Those that ignore history, etc...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
history
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Apple - Here we go again
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Android Apps
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Illegal restraint of trade?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Absolutely.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Odd Choice of Android
It seems to me that a much better choice would be to code for WinMo, RIM, or Symbian at this point, and put Android at the back of the priority line.
Whether Android rocks or not is not the point. Addressable market is.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Odd Choice of Android
1) Many of HTC's current and future phone models can run Android - we're just waiting for a public released ROM to flash onto our phones
2) Google has a pretty good rep with developers - many developers will code apps for Android simply because it isn't MSFT and Apple won't let 'em ...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]