Fair Use Project Sues Michael Savage For Stifling Free Speech Of His Critics
from the yet-again dept
You may recall the lawsuit earlier this year, where radio talk show host Michael Savage tried to sue one of his critics for copyright infringement. The group in question had a pretty clear fair use claim, as they were using Savage's radio broadcasts for commentary and to respond to Savage's attacks on the group. And, in fact, a judge wasted little time explaining fair use to Savage, and tossing out the lawsuit.However, it appears that Savage hasn't yet learned his lesson on fair use, as he's apparently been sending more takedown notices to folks who use his recordings and respond critically to Savage's on-air claims. In this case, the production company Brave New Films created a similar video critiquing Savage's statements. Savage's syndicator sent out a DMCA takedown notice -- something it clearly should have known was questionable given the recent lawsuit results. So, now, the Fair Use Project is suing Michael Savage and his syndicator, Original Talk Radio Network, on behalf of Brave New Films, for misrepresentations in their DMCA takedown notice.
In the original case, we had some Savage fans show up here in the comments insisting that his misuse of copyright was a good thing, because it would help "expose" the group that was criticizing him as a terrorist front. That's a ridiculous statement of course. If the group were a terrorist front, then that's something for the government to deal with -- rather than a justification for misusing copyright law. Are we now going to hear that Brave New Films is really a terrorist front as well? Or is it just anyone who criticizes Savage must be a terrorist front, and thus it's perfectly fine to try to misuse copyright law to shut them up? Free speech doesn't mean just the speech of people who agree with you.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, dmca, fair use, michael savage, takedowns
Companies: brave new films, fair use project, original talk radio network
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
and....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Savage fans
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I like Savage
That's not really what he's doing. Striesand Effect anyone? Could it be that Savage is doing this just to get his name out there a little more? Yeah -- that sounds a little more like Michael Savage.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: I like Savage
Savage also seems to have a major persecution complex. I don't know if he's diagnosably paranoid or not, but he often states that the world is out to get him. No, this isn't a cleverly engineered reverse Streisand campaign. It's just an overbearing nut who has decided to fight his fight at all costs. It's really kind of sad. He has good ideas and makes good points, then buries that in rants about pornographers, pedophiles, and the apocalypse.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: I like Savage
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: I like Savage
If we had a conservative government homosexual marriage, freedom of speech, abortion... all of that would be in the bag.
As it is we have a 'reactionary traditionalist' group that calls themselves conservatives.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: I like Savage
...Since when?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Savage is another in a line of talking heads that have taken over the Republican party using the flag of conservatism to push forth a lot of anti-intellectual, anti-rationalist pro-christian, Pro-Israel garbage. As someone else implied, these people know NOTHING about what being a republican means. Savage is just more idiotic than most
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: I like Savage
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Who's Michael Savage?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: I like Savage
The particular show I heard had him complaining that other conservatives (i.e. Hannity or Limbaugh) didn't come to his aid when he went under fire for something. Other conservative hosts probably don't give a crap about him if they know who he is.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Entertainment vs News
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Fair use
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I love Michael Savage!
(yes, I know)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: I like Savage
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I don't see how allowing 2 people of the same sex to marry harms others in any way.....It certainly doesn't change the strength, security or meaning of my marriage to my wife.
You claim to be for freedom of speech and yet your party has consistently lobbied for and voted for laws that remove the freedoms of the american people, in exchange for a false sense of security.
You say "regardless of what you may think", however you don't offer any proof to the contrary.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: I like Savage
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: I like Savage
Why is it OK to execute a human being but not abort a human being? Killing is killing. If you believe in "Thou shalt not kill" then you need to apply it to all human beings.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Secondly, if do a few media searches, you'd find out that the liberal hack/judge that threw out Savage's lawsuit, has other problems as well with his legislating from the bench but that is San Francisco for you. Don't drink the water.
So I'm thinking that your argument doesn't present itself very well, without more research included.
This isn't anything out of the norm for you mike.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: I like Savage
You ask why is it OK to execute a human being but not abort a human being. It's a matter of guilt versus innocence.
If it's not OK for the State to execute someone who has been tried by a jury of his peers and found to be guilty of what society deems to be the most heinous of crimes, why is it OK to kill the most vulnerable human beings whose only crime is being an inconvenience to their parents? (I'll concede abortion when the life of the mother is at risk.)
Since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976, 1123 convicted murderers have been executed in the United States (as of October 1, 2008). During that same period, at least 37 million babies were aborted. Even if every one of those executed was wrongly convicted, the ratio of innocent convicts to innocent fetuses is infinitesimal.
It seems that Stalin was predicting conventional wisdom in 21st Century America when he said, "One death is a tragedy; a million is a statistic."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Reel it back in you nutjobs.
What it is about the internet that causes every post to turn into a "my team is better than your team, because I said so" argument?
None of you come across as sane individuals. (Except for #1. The Chomsky quote was nice.)
Anyone got anything on the issue of fair use? Anyone?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Who's Michael Savage?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: I like Savage
Skulls for the Skull Throne
Praise the Lord
Praise Jesus
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Feminists have done more damage to Marriage than gays will ever do with their No-Fault Divorce and Alimony/Child Support "Entitlement" Scam.
If you really want to protect marriage, than you make divorce unrewarding.
Even if the country makes gay marriage illegal, not one single marriage will be saved or protected from divorce.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Michael Savage rules
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: I like Savage
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Left-wing Haters
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6967
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6967
http://www.colony14.net/id 41.html
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: I like Savage
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]