Google's Antitrust Problems Not Just In The US

from the google-rears-its-head dept

As Google not-so-eagerly awaits the US Justice Department's word on whether or not it's violating antitrust laws, it appears that the fear of Google-as-a-monopoly is not just a domestic US issue. There are a bunch of headlines about how Russia's antitrust agency has rejected Google's purchase of an ad agency in that country. Technically, the claim is that Google didn't file the proper paperwork, but the agency made it clear that it's worried about Google becoming monopolistic. Of course, as with the Google-Yahoo deal, it's unclear what the "monopoly" is that's being dealt with here or how people are harmed. It seems like this might just be a general "must fear Google" position, than anything based on an actual problem.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: advertising, antitrust, russia
Companies: google


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 23 Oct 2008 @ 9:07pm

    While I think its true that Google is getting really big (though maybe not quite as big as the other guys, yet), doesn't anti trust have to do with using your monopolized power to keep others from competing with you, rather than just having a whole lot of the market?

    Also, although I don't know about in other countries, but here in the U.S, I wonder if the current situation with Google has even the slightest to do with them not giving the govt. see their searches. Granted, I think that was a while back but....

    Well. Maybe I'm wrong. I'll just go sit in the corner with my tin foil dunce hat on now. No need to tell me I'm an idiot. :)

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Chunky Vomit, 23 Oct 2008 @ 9:36pm

    Re:

    I don't believe that our government is smart enough to be that coordinated. But at the same time, it wouldn't surprise me if you turn out to be correct.

    I guess we'll know the truth in a few years when PBS does a documentary that shows these things to be true.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 23 Oct 2008 @ 9:53pm

    "Of course, as with the Google-Yahoo deal, it's unclear what the "monopoly" is that's being dealt with here.."

    Read the Sherman and Clayton Acts and you just might be able to appreciate how "monopoly" under antitrust law has an entirely different meaning from how the word is used on this site.

    BTW, the above Acts are not limited to just mergers and acquisitions.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. icon
    Mike (profile), 24 Oct 2008 @ 12:44am

    Re:

    Read the Sherman and Clayton Acts and you just might be able to appreciate how "monopoly" under antitrust law has an entirely different meaning from how the word is used on this site.

    Quite familiar with both, MLS, but as we have pointed out in the past, there are serious problems with antitrust law that allows people to call something a monopoly when it's not.

    Again, we have reached this stalemate where you, MLS, insist that everything is fine because of what the law says. We're pointing out why that doesn't make sense.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Kirion, 24 Oct 2008 @ 2:36am

    It has nothing to do with laws

    Russian internet advertising market grows fast, but it's still fairly small. And it's already monopolized, but by russian company Yandex (55% of market).

    So in this case, it can be 2 things. Either bribes for russian goverment officials wasn't big enough (yes, you can't make any big deal here in Russia without substantial bribes for various goverment agencies)or goverment was used by competitors to stop deal to protect their own business (there are very powerfull people among Yandex shareholders for example).

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    Stas, 24 Oct 2008 @ 4:50am

    Re:

    Google is simply too big for our rather small market.
    By the way yandex stil seems to be more usefull for me than google (i`m russian)

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. identicon
    lancehassan, 24 Oct 2008 @ 5:54am

    Google

    let's see now, the US now ranks 36th in the world in Press freedom and Russia is reverting to a state run bureaucracy. What could possibly be the problem with Google's information flow? I believe "monopoly" aside from being a board game is a convenient excuse for fear.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  8. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 24 Oct 2008 @ 8:24am

    Re: Re:

    I most certainly did not say "everything is fine because of what the law says." What I did note is that "monopoly" has a distinctive meaning under antitrust law. Further elaboration on this point can be found on the site for the DOJ Antitrust Division.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  9. identicon
    Anon Cow, 24 Oct 2008 @ 11:39am

    The acquisition was rejected because the stock options they gave the Russian politicians are under water...

    link to this | view in thread ]

  10. identicon
    Willton, 26 Oct 2008 @ 9:08pm

    Re: Re:

    Quite familiar with both, MLS, but as we have pointed out in the past, there are serious problems with antitrust law that allows people to call something a monopoly when it's not.

    If you're that familiar with antitrust law, then you wouldn't be questioning why the Google-Yahoo deal would be considered a potential violation of said law.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.