Economists Realizing That Current Music Industry Structure Leads To 'Sub-Optimal Outcomes'

from the you-noticed? dept

Fri, Oct 31st 2008 10:44am — Mike Masnick

The music collection society MCPS PRS in the UK apparently had three economists coming from different viewpoints work together on a paper concerning the economics of the music industry on the internet today. It includes an economist from the collection society, one from the internet industry and one from the music industry. While the resulting paper does have some good points -- such as being one of the few industry produced papers that doesn't try to ignore the fact that file sharing directly competes with things like iTunes -- it appears to have some weaknesses as well.

The paper basically tries to describe the overall landscape for music on the internet, dividing it into three units (reflecting the three people working on the report): Music Service Providers (MSPs) such as Kazaa or iTunes (and, yes, it's impressive that they directly lump the authorized and unauthorized players together), Music Rights Providers (MRPs) such as ASCAP or other collections societies, and ISPs. The paper then uses some basic game theory to note that the interactions between these three players will often lead to "sub-optimal outcomes." No, really?

Instead, they suggest that the entire incentive structure of the industry should be reconsidered -- which is something I clearly believe as well. However, from the article, it looks like the approaches they line up don't do enough of that reconsidering. Why? Because they don't even seem to take into account the idea that (a) there are other players in the market that should be considered in the ecosystem and (b) one of the three legs of the stool set forth in the premise (the collections societies) may not be needed. If you take them out of the equation, but plug in other components of the market (say, the musicians themselves) you can quite easily see the model working quite differently than what's described in the report. Indeed, the options for creating win-win solutions become much clearer. In ignoring the other aspects of the market, while not considering that these so-called MRPs may not be necessary in today's world, the report falls well short of actually laying out optimal solutions in the market.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: economists, efficiency, music industry, optimal outcomes

10 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 31 Oct 2008 @ 11:44am

Who cares what you think...I wish I could have my minute back.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 31 Oct 2008 @ 11:52am
  
  Re:
  Here you go:
  
  Coupon for 1 min.....
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 31 Oct 2008 @ 12:39pm
  
  Re:
  Seriously, do jackholes like you reach orgasm by repeatedly reading blogs you don't like, then bitching about the time you "wasted" reading it? Talk about wasting time . . .
  
  If you don't like what's said here, try this: DON'T FUCKING READ TECHDIRT. GO AWAY. STAY AWAY.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Norm, 31 Oct 2008 @ 1:09pm
  
  Re:
  You are the epitome of your moniker.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
bulkhead, 31 Oct 2008 @ 1:21pm

I don't understand point b, ASCAP, BMI and the like represent the "musicians themselves" not ISPs or itunes. If you take them out of the equation, the artist that created the product will have very little leverage to get paid.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Kyle, 31 Oct 2008 @ 1:32pm
  
  Re: bulkhead
  The point is that modern distribution technologies don't require the same kind of involvement from ASCAP, etc. These agencies were needed for keeping track of physical media sales and collecting the associated fees(which aren't paid when media is sold to retail outlets, but only after sale to a consumer); however, they add no value to electronic sales monitoring and fee collection. iTunes (and other legal electronic distributors) can fairly easily pay artists directly on a per-download basis.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Mike (profile), 1 Nov 2008 @ 5:10pm
  
  Re:
  I don't understand point b, ASCAP, BMI and the like represent the "musicians themselves" not ISPs or itunes
  
  They're supposed to, but they rarely do. What they really represent is anything that lets them collect more royalties. Thus, business models that don't involve royalties, even if they make musicians better off, are not even acknowledged.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
javaholic, 31 Oct 2008 @ 1:33pm

all of these folks in this equation have left out the most important part of the equation and who actually runs the music industry.......

The Buying Public....can make it or Break it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
javaholic, 31 Oct 2008 @ 1:40pm

all of these folks in this equation have left out the most important part of the equation and who actually runs the music industry.......

The Buying Public....can make it or Break it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Cowherd, 1 Nov 2008 @ 3:22pm

The first step
Well, you know what they say: the first step is admitting that they have a problem.

Now they've taken that step. Only 11 more to go.

It's a start, anyway...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]