Microsoft Tries A 'First One's Free' Strategy To Lure Startups

from the you-know-you-want-to-try... dept

Microsoft certainly recognizes the fact that most startups these days are automatically gravitating to a LAMP infrastructure (Linux, Apache, MySQL and PHP). So, now it seems to be trying out a new program to lure startups by offering them free software for a few years and combining it with additional services that they hope will appeal to startups. It's an interesting approach, though, in the long run, it still seems like they may have the equation backwards. While they are giving some stuff away free initially, the ultimate goal is to lock companies into paying for infinite goods like software, rather than scarcities like services.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: free, services, software, startups
Companies: microsoft


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Sallo, 5 Nov 2008 @ 4:41pm

    It's been said before...

    No such thing as a free lunch!!!

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    some old guy, 5 Nov 2008 @ 4:46pm

    Re: It's been said before...

    huh?

    LAMP is free....

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Sallo, 5 Nov 2008 @ 5:30pm

    Re: Re: It's been said before...

    Yeah, Free...Unless you want support, then you pay.
    Its been talked about here before. The free business model works only if you have a way to charge people later. Free software is the hook to get paid for services later.

    So yes, LAMP = Free now, Pay later!

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    some old guy, 5 Nov 2008 @ 5:47pm

    Re: Re: Re: It's been said before...

    Nobody's "hooked" and has to pay for support at all. You've completely deluded yourself.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 5 Nov 2008 @ 6:02pm

    Luke !
    It's a trap !

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    Nobody, 5 Nov 2008 @ 6:21pm

    Re:

    Our businesses can't repel lock-ins of that magnitude!

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. identicon
    Anthony, 5 Nov 2008 @ 6:45pm

    NOT FREE!

    Enrollment is free, just pay a USD $100 program offering fee at program exit.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  8. identicon
    ehrichweiss, 5 Nov 2008 @ 7:08pm

    Re: Re: Re: It's been said before...

    Unless of course you have any google-fu and then you can get 99% of your support for free.

    So actually LAMP = Free now, Free later unless you're just dumb...so I'm guessing I know why you think someone has to pay for it. Idiot.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  9. identicon
    Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 6 Nov 2008 @ 12:13am

    Re: It's been said before...

    some old guy wrote:

        Sallo wrote:

            No such thing as a free lunch!!!

        LAMP is free....

    ...nicely conflating two different meanings of "free".

    link to this | view in thread ]

  10. identicon
    Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 6 Nov 2008 @ 12:17am

    The key word is "lock"

    Key to the proprietary-software business model is the fact that, once you've become accustomed to using the vendor's product, switching away from it becomes a lot more expensive than simply continuing to pay the licence fees. It's hard to see how this might work with a LAMP-alternative, given that all the data has to be in open-standard formats (HTML, CSS etc) anyway.

    Unless this is Microsoft practising "give-it-away-and-pray", or at least "give-it-away-for-now-and-hope-we-come-up-with-some-way-to-monetize-this-before-it-bleeds-us-into-th e-ground"...

    link to this | view in thread ]

  11. identicon
    Tony, 6 Nov 2008 @ 8:02am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: It's been said before...

    "unless you're just dumb"

    I see.

    So the entrepreneur who knows how to start and build a successful business, but doesn't understand the nuances of linux, is just dumb.

    The executive who has his hands full running a business and doesn't have time to deal with such details is just dumb.

    Got it.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  12. identicon
    JEDIDIAH, 6 Nov 2008 @ 8:42am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: It's been said before...

    > The executive who has his hands full running a business
    > and doesn't have time to deal with such details is just
    > dumb.

    Yes.

    That said, you don't have an "executive" running startups.
    If the man at the top doesn't have a clue, then he's good
    at surrounding himself with people that do. That's the only
    way you can survive in that kind of environment.

    A "startup" environment much less forgiving than the sort of environment that allows an "executive" to play stupid power games and build petty fiefdoms.

    You certainly can't trust someone that's trying to sell
    you something. That's much like putting your trust into
    a used car salesman.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  13. identicon
    Rebsky, 6 Nov 2008 @ 11:43am

    Why this makes sense

    A startup has to control capital expenditures much more than a company that's actually got some cash flow going. This eliminates the biggest risk for a startup to using MS products: not being able to afford the licenses at a time when cash is most limited. Later on, if the business becomes more successful, then it will be able to afford the licensing fees.

    I know it might be hard to believe for all of you who are convinced that selling software is evil, but it is a workable business model, and you could do much worse than Microsoft for a platform stack.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.