EU Continues To Give Bogus Reasons For Keeping ACTA Secret

from the transparency-please dept

Tue, Nov 11th 2008 1:38pm — Mike Masnick

One of the most disgusting displays of an industry crafting laws to benefit their industry in backrooms is the secret negotiations over the ACTA treaty. This is the international agreement on copyright that's basically been written by entertainment industry insiders, and will effectively force governments around the world to change copyright laws in favor of the entertainment industry. Yet, the actual negotiations are being held in secret. When confronted about it, various government negotiators have basically said it has to be secret because that's the way things are done. A few months ago, in defending the secrecy, one of the negotiators noted that it was being kept secret because negotiators had agreed to keep it secret. That's not a defense; that's a cop out.

Plenty of organizations around the world are pushing for more transparency and (*gasp!*) the actual inclusion of others who would be impacted by ACTA, but they're not finding it easy. Slashdot points us a press release from The Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure. FFII had filed a request to the EU Council to release some of the secret documents related to the ACTA negotiation, and the EU Council flat-out refused to do so. It would appear that when the government seeks to put in place an industry's preferred legislation, it doesn't like being called out on it.

However, the more that individuals and organizations around the world speak up and demand that the details behind ACTA be made public, hopefully the more politicians will realize that they can't sell out society's overall best interest in favor of a few industries who are abusing the treaty process for their own interests.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: acta, copyright, eu, intellectual property, international trade, treaties

9 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 11 Nov 2008 @ 3:40pm

Politicians
...politicians will realize that they can't sell out society's overall best interest in favor of a few industries who are abusing the treaty process for their own interests.
Huh? Since when? Selling out "society's overall best interest in favor of a few industries" is what they do best.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Kiba, 11 Nov 2008 @ 5:22pm

Anarchy!
That why we should abolish the government so they can't force stupid regulation down our throat.

Anarchy!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Mike, 11 Nov 2008 @ 5:43pm

whatever
It doesn't matter, we'll keep downloading, and we'll keep staying two steps ahead of the moronic tech-stupid Riaa/Mpaa
They can't hold on forever... this economic slump will hopefully cause them a lot of grief and lose them a lot of money. I hope the entire industry goes bankrupt.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 11 Nov 2008 @ 5:46pm

Doesn't congress have to agree or something like that ?
Do they get to read it before they vote ?

Somehow I don't think it can be binding upon the public when it is so contrived. Certainly it will nopt be received well.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Mike, 11 Nov 2008 @ 6:08pm

Re:
uh, NAFTA?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
crystalattice (profile), 11 Nov 2008 @ 9:22pm

The pirates will win
Regardless of what laws are passed, the "outlaws" will continue to beat them. They can make whatever rules and regulations they want but people will still pirate, especially if the new laws make legal content less useful and less valuable.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
bikey (profile), 12 Nov 2008 @ 12:45am

ACTA is so much more
ACTA is much more than 'changing national copyright laws'. TRIPS did that in 1995. It applies to all forms of IP and from what one can glean, would require customs officials in all 'signatory' (i.e. those forced to sign after the formerly developed countries have it securely in place) to enforce IP laws at the borders at the expense of all other interests. So much feeds into this. Would, for example, US law permitting confiscation and copying of hard disks at borders in order to 'detect' and 'prevent' illegal import and export of IP be globalized? It's fairly clear that it would. It is not for nothing that this is being negotiated through the formerly low-key International Customs Organization. It is being kept secret because this makes the World Trade Agreement of 1995 look like child's play. IP is the last hold the US and the EU have on the world economy. They are not going to let it go down the drain because of the fundamental rights this ACTA will violate, namely but not exclusively privacy and the right to protect personal data.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
pat donovan, 12 Nov 2008 @ 4:15am

acta
deal with vapor and get vaporized.

this isn't kanaas anymore toto; they aren't plastic people anymore.

it's an all-electronic world.. culture, elections,

and reg captured industries.

get your monoploies while they're hot!
pat
qutoas and smuggling are the new growth industries.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
hashashin, 12 Nov 2008 @ 7:00am

1789 and 1848
those were good years, we could use an "re-enactment".
Remember, if you lack bread, eat cake.
[ link to this | view in thread ]