Argentinian Celebrities Succeed In Forcing Search Engines To Block Search Results On Their Name
from the internet-stupidity dept
Proving, once again, that common sense isn't so common, News.com is reporting on a series of orders handed down by judges in Argentina that have forced Google and Yahoo to completely block searches on certain Argentinian celebrities. Apparently, some Argentinian models who were upset that their pictures were showing up on some porn sites, sued both Yahoo and Google. For anyone who understands just about anything about how the internet works, it would be easy to recognize that this lawsuit was grossly mistargeted. Yahoo and Google have nothing to do with the content on the various websites they point to, but apparently Argentinian models and judges do not seem to recognize this.So, the judges issued an injunction, demanding that Google and Yahoo block references to the models. This "win" caused other Argentinian celebrities who were upset with content online about them to seek out the same lawyer, who filed similar lawsuits over and over again. Each time, the court has issued an injunction, forcing Google and Yahoo to block results on those individuals. In some cases, they've tried to block specific results, but in at least one case, Yahoo has blocked all results on a search for Argentinian soccer star Diego Maradona. The blocks only impact the Argentinian sites, but it still seems fairly ridiculous.
Google is appealing the injunctions, saying that this really seems like something of a shakedown. The company is also trying to explain to the Argentinian government why it should put in place safe harbor laws that protect service providers from being liable for the content created by others. Of course, even without such laws in place, common sense should prevail. Apparently, though, common sense remains less common than commonly believed.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: argentina, celebrities, liability, safe harbors, search engines
Companies: google, yahoo
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Which implies...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Which implies...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Which implies...
By the way, I did a quick Google search on Stephen Finch, and unless you are both an accountant, lawyer, actor, there are quite a few other people who share your name. (Something that NEVER happens in the United States!) :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Which implies...
No one is saying that "Only in Latin America are there a lot of people with the same names." it is pointing out that in Latin America that there will be many names that match. Just as in most other countries.
The mere fact that your geographical are is mentioned dose not make it a racist statement. On the other hand I usually find that those who jump in and see racism everywhere are the type of person who is a loser and looking for some way to blame their pathetic life on someone else.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Which implies...
If I offended Stephen or anybody else with my comment and if I misread the intention, I apologize.
That being said, just stating that I might have misjudged the comment would have made your contribution so much better. I wasn't looking for trouble and I didn't mean to say "YOUR ALL RACISTZ!1!11!", I was just pointing out something I caught when I read that comment, and now I realize that I might have been incorrect. There is no need for insults. A nice, intelligent argument sufficed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
1. Some politician are using this to filter out truthful information that they want censored (scandals and such)
2. Looking for Diego Maradonna does list all the sites where Maradona y mentioned, thanks to google's and yahoo's ortographic correction (epic fail).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Spelling
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Which implies
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Which implies
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pate Valle
Still, it does make me laugh...I struggle sometimes to speak at a lower vocabulary level in order to communicate with those around me. It is a remarkably sad commentary that the posession of a strong vocabulary is so rare...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What about TOR?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Common sense?
Fast forward to today. Who can we say has been serving as the great example of common sense that anyone should follow? Is it the U.S. justice system? Is it the vaunted French legal system (where a newspaper didn't want to be linked by Google)? How about censor-happy China? ...
Answer: no one. Not one government has kept its ears clean. Even the multinationals that should know better haven't done a whole lot to help things along but rather have been too busy seeing how they could take advantage of any ignorance to want to correct the situation.
So now that they see this sort of ignorance spreading everywhere and starting to see how it could threaten their business, suddenly it's time to panic? They should called a spade a spade when they had the chance.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]