NBC's Rick Cotton Apparently Unable To Properly Monetize Value
from the why-does-he-keep-his-job? dept
I'm beginning to wonder if NBC Universal simply sends General Counsel Rick Cotton out to the press to make the most ridiculous, unsupportable statements for their PR value. Otherwise, you have to wonder how the man keeps his job, as pretty much any of his well-publicized statements should make shareholders question his business acumen. This is the guy who claimed that the government should force ISPs to filter unauthorized content because piracy was causing poor corn farmers to lose money (despite the fact that corn farmers are doing better than ever, and there's no evidence that they're impacted by piracy either way -- people can eat popcorn during pirated movies, too). He also suggested that police would be better off spending less on stopping bank robberies and more on piracy. Seriously. Then he was happy that NBC made it difficult for people to watch the Olympics online.His latest claim doesn't quite reach the level of some of his earlier statements, but again it has you scratching your head over how he can have the confidence of his bosses. Over the weekend, he was apparently complaining that the only reason YouTube was worth $1.5 billion to Google was because the video of SNL's Andy Samberg "Lazy Sunday." He claims that YouTube received all of the benefit of this piracy, which catapulted it to stardom.
First of all, this simply isn't true. As a YouTube representative who follows Cotton noted, the Lazy Sunday video is pretty much impossible to pick out of YouTube's log files, since it had such little impact on traffic. But, more importantly, this is yet another case of a content provider overvaluing the content and undervaluing the delivery platform. Cotton seems to ignore the fact that the Lazy Sunday video on YouTube almost single-handedly brought a ton of people back to SNL after having given the show up. It made people pay more attention to SNL, in particular other Samberg videos.
Furthermore, if it's actually true that NBC got no value out of Lazy Sunday being on YouTube, then the entire NBC management team deserves to be fired. It was such a fantastic opportunity to rebuild SNL's brand, and here's one of the company's top executives flat-out admitting that he blew it. He really wants people to believe that he's so inept that a tiny startup with barely any revenue could capitalize on something that he could not? It's either amazing what poor vision NBC's management has, or it's just stunning that Cotton keeps his job.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: content, lazy sunday, monetizing, rick cotton
Companies: nbc universal, youtube
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Story Based TV Shows
And NBC doesn't offer the entire current season on its website. You'd think that they would recognize that people simply can't jump in midseason so they should probably let anyone watch as much as they want to online. But then again see what this post was actually written about and you can understand how it happens, if not why it happens.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
over-valued content
here's another:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/23/business/media/23eisner.html?_r=2&pagewanted=1& ;th&emc=th&pagewanted=all
'bout halfway down the article, mr. eisner states quite clearly:
"Today, without shareholders to worry about, he is driven by his creative impulses and an almost messianic belief that movies and TV shows and videos are more valuable in the long run than the pipes over which they are delivered.
"It’s always the content that defines the platform,” he says. Now the platform owners are “being arrogant and saying, ‘we’re it,’” he adds. “But eventually exclusive content wins out.”
maybe mr. cotton and mr. eisner share an alma mater somewhere. hehe. aar, they are being seriously left behind.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's The Connectivity, Stupid!
robin quoted:
The Internet has never been about content, but about connectivity--what attracts people to it is that it's the single biggest place to get connected to other people.
A lot of the proprietary alternatives to the Internet in the early days didn't appreciate this--CompuServe, the original AOL, MSN in its original form. Who still remembers Quark pushing Immedia as an alternative to the World-Wide Web? They all thought their content would bring the Internet to them. In the end it was they who had to go to the Internet.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Jeez, techdirt
Seriously though, thanks for the chuckle.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It's The Connectivity, Stupid!
That's fantastic analogy, Lawrence. So true, so true.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lazy Sunday brought me back
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
NBC's GC: How does he keep his job?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]