Finland Thinks Russia Violated Its Design Right With Military Camouflage

from the camouflage-wears-you dept

Apparently, intellectual property issues can show up even in the middle of a warzone. It seems that some Finnish officials, reviewing images and videos of the Russian invasion of Georgia earlier this year were somewhat upset to note that Russian military uniforms appeared to have copied Finnish military camouflage design -- which, yes, the Finnish government has legally protected in Europe (found via Open IT Strategies). Finland has decided not to pursue the issue, and Russian officials deny the copying, but it still shows how weird a world we live in when governments are using intellectual property rights to try to protect military camouflage designs.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: camouflage, copyright, design right, finland, russia


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 1 Dec 2008 @ 9:47am

    The US Marine Corps does hold a copyright on their digital camouflage pattern. Admittedly, the Marine Corps Emblem is found throughout the pattern, but still....

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Baloney Joe, 1 Dec 2008 @ 10:02am

    Nope

    The US government cannot copyright anything created using public money, that would include camo...prove me wrong and show me a copyright for the design...

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Pork 4 Mohammed, 1 Dec 2008 @ 10:08am

    Finland is wrong

    The Russians camo pattern has vodka bottles embedded throughout the camouflage.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    drkkgt, 1 Dec 2008 @ 10:26am

    Re: Re: Nope

    sorry read this as patent not copyright - my bust.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 1 Dec 2008 @ 10:29am

    Although I was incorrect (copyright vs patent) it still constitutes intellectual property, does it not?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 1 Dec 2008 @ 10:29am

    Silly borshch. Meat Solyanka is for kids.

    It was probably a superior design.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. identicon
    Lonnie E. Holder, 1 Dec 2008 @ 10:30am

    But it might be patented...

    See U.S. patent 6,805,957.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  8. identicon
    Buzz, 1 Dec 2008 @ 10:45am

    Hahaha

    Soon after, Finland went to war with Russia over the design. No shots were fired, however. The camouflage was so good, neither nation could see the other.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  9. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 1 Dec 2008 @ 10:55am

    Re: Hahaha

    On second note, both sides, confused, caused total casualties weakening both sides strengths by 100%. Friendly frag = 98% total deaths.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  10. identicon
    Lonnie E. Holder, 1 Dec 2008 @ 10:55am

    Re: Hahaha

    So, any suit would have failed anyway since no one could see the evidence.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  11. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 1 Dec 2008 @ 11:53am

    Business idea

    Finnish army should try selling tshirts with this design to supplement their income :)

    link to this | view in thread ]

  12. identicon
    C to the J, 1 Dec 2008 @ 12:36pm

    Finland has a military?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  13. identicon
    Egottie, 1 Dec 2008 @ 1:09pm

    USMC

    As a former marine I can attest to the camo being protected. Im not going to argue semantics ie( copyrighted patented ect). But I can attest to every Item sold with the pattern haveing a sticker on it saying somthing to the effect "Pattern copyright USMC"

    link to this | view in thread ]

  14. identicon
    Goldie, 1 Dec 2008 @ 1:18pm

    Them and what army?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  15. identicon
    Tapio Rissanen, 1 Dec 2008 @ 1:46pm

    Re:

    Yes, and they kicked the Soviets ass in WWII. Full of awesome and win.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  16. icon
    Chris Charabaruk (profile), 1 Dec 2008 @ 4:32pm

    When I was a teen, I was in the Royal Canadian Army Cadets. In those days, cadets would more often than not wear combat uniforms, as the solid olive green uniforms were easily purchased and manufactured even for the public.

    Since the older combat uniforms were replaced with the IP law protected CADPAT design, most cadet corps now tend to simply drill around a lot in their dress uniforms. As older, used CADPAT uniforms turn up in surplus stores, things may change back to how it used to be, but given that uniforms for cadets have to be the same as those used by the Canadian Forces, the possibility of independently manufacturing and selling CATPATs is nil, due to the protection around the design.

    So seeing this isn't surprising at all for me, or likely any other Canadian with cadets experience.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  17. icon
    bikey (profile), 1 Dec 2008 @ 11:41pm

    camo

    First of, this is neither copyright (which, by the way costs nothing and comes into existence at the moment your creation has fixed form) nor patent (used to protect inventions, very expensive and requires novelty, inventiveness and utility, none of which camo has). It is 'design' protection, a right which doesn't exist in US law except for the rather useless (to those who need immediate and inexpensive design protection) 'design patent', that has hardly any overlap in use or structure to the European design right, which this is about. IP isn't semantics, it's the last hold of the western world on the global economy. It is our 'savior' and our damnation. Might be good if people understood it a bit more. Otherwise, charming story. You go Finland.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  18. icon
    bikey (profile), 1 Dec 2008 @ 11:54pm

    camo

    Afterthought: This is an EC right. Finland probably didn't register it under Russian law, so, unless Russia invades wearing said duds, no infringement. It's territorial this stuff. Sorry Finland.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  19. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 2 Dec 2008 @ 4:55am

    Re: Re:

    Where do you morons come from anyway?

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.