RIAA Caught Lying About Stopping Lawsuits
from the shocking dept
The RIAA and the record labels who make up its main membership keep asking folks like us to "trust them" when they come up with new plans to force people to hand over money. They say that we shouldn't criticize them until the plan is set, but they haven't yet shown the slightest reason to grant them an ounce of trust. Just last week, we suggested that they stop suing people, if they were so intent on turning over a new leaf. And, while they did finally announce plans to abandon mass lawsuits, the fine print is anything but encouraging (and, it's increasingly clear that it was done more to save money than out of any more reasoned strategy).However, there was a bit of surprising news that came out of the press barrage after the announcement about giving up on the mass lawsuits: the RIAA claimed that it had stopped filing lawsuits months earlier. That certainly didn't fit with the story we had just seen earlier in the week of new lawsuits, and now Ray Beckerman has put together a list of recently filed lawsuits by the RIAA and its major record label members in the last few weeks.
In other words, the RIAA has been caught lying yet again. Shocking. And, yet, they expect us to "trust them" to come up with a better solution -- one negotiated in backrooms behind closed doors without major stakeholders getting to take part? Forgive us for being skeptical that any such deal will be reasonable. What's really disappointing, though, is to see some major tech publications get taken in by this, insisting that somehow the RIAA really has turned over a new leaf. You would think that reporters covering this space wouldn't be so gullible.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
No, it's perfectly accurate.
If I recall correctly, the "plan" is a possible approach that WMG is trying to evaluate in a trial to see if it is even feasible.
That's not what this post is talking about (at all). The RIAA clearly claimed that it had not filed any new lawsuits since August. That's simply untrue.
I'm pretty sure my post was clear on this.
Until an agreement to run such a trial is crafted and executed, and until the trial is actually conducted and evaluated by the trial participants, it seems to me that WMG would continue its current efforts pending the trial's outcome.
Again, the lie was the RIAA saying it had stopped filing lawsuits months ago. To find out that's not true seems like an overt lie.
I'm confused as to why you seem to think it's about WM's plan...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
so what else is new?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: so what else is new?
Mi familia inherited it from some distant relatives... and it eventually became all mine. I cannot afford the taxes on it, so I'm willing to part with my bridge for a VERY reasonable price.
Let me know if you're interested!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
LET THEM DIE in A FIRE!
Not 1 Cent, Fuck them!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
confused
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-10127050-93.html
What one ISP had to say about it:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-10127841-93.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ars let me down again
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Opps
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Testing the waters
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: confused
on the other hand, never pay a cent for an RIAA artists music. Support your local music scene!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: confused
Is that what you do on this site? If someone has a differing opinion than your own you call them a name and tell them to leave. Classy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RIAA
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And this is somehow news?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RIAA makes Mafia Look Good
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
There -- fixed that for you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
lying before the court too
[ link to this | view in chronology ]