Taking Competition To The Extreme: Phony Slide Show Of Disgruntled Competitor Customers
from the wow dept
We see plenty of frivolous lawsuits around here, but that doesn't mean all lawsuits are frivolous, obviously. Sometimes you come across a lawsuit where it's stunning what a company tried to get away with in terms of fraud. Take, for example, the case that was just settled between SuccessFactors and its competitor Softscape. Apparently, Softscape put together a totally bogus PowerPoint presentation of a made up disgruntled SuccessFactors customer and passed it around anonymously to potential customers. SuccessFactors sued, and Softscape settled before getting hit with a judgment that certainly would have gone in SuccessFactors' favor. There's plenty that's "fair game" in business competition, but this clearly went over the line.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: competition
Companies: softscape, success factors
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
and SuccessFactors agreed with it because...
this is ofcourse pure speculation
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Defendant: Patrick Eugene Premo
Filed: 07/23/2009
VC 5204A Infraction CURRENT TABS IMPROPERLY PLACED
Case number: 205TR014402
Defendant: Patrick Eugene Premo
Filed: 10/27/2005
VC 22450A Infraction FAILURE TO STOP AT STOP SIGN TrafficSchool 11/16/2005
VC 40508C Misdemeanor FAIL TO COMPY W/CONDITION OF A COURT ORDER/PROMISE TO PAY
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Defendant: Patrick Eugene Premo
Filed: 07/23/2009
Case will be referred for collection
as of 11/16/2009
Payment state: DUE
$ 464.00
VC 5204A Infraction CURRENT TABS IMPROPERLY PLACED
11/16/2009 04:00PM Trial By Declaration (in absentia)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
remove from comments
#
#
Aug 25th, 2009 @ 10:28am
by anonymous
Case number: 209TR216347
Defendant: Patrick Eugene Premo
Filed: 07/23/2009
VC 5204A Infraction CURRENT TABS IMPROPERLY PLACED
Case number: 205TR014402
Defendant: Patrick Eugene Premo
Filed: 10/27/2005
VC 22450A Infraction FAILURE TO STOP AT STOP SIGN TrafficSchool 11/16/2005
VC 40508C Misdemeanor FAIL TO COMPY W/CONDITION OF A COURT ORDER/PROMISE TO PAY
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
#
Nov 5th, 2009 @ 1:56pm
by Anonymous Coward
Case number: 209TR216347
Defendant: Patrick Eugene Premo
Filed: 07/23/2009
Case will be referred for collection
as of 11/16/2009
Payment state: DUE
$ 464.00
VC 5204A Infraction CURRENT TABS IMPROPERLY PLACED
11/16/2009 04:00PM Trial By Declaration (in absentia)
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
it is found here:
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081229/1928153242.shtml#comments
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
DOB 3.13.1967
1190 MEREDITH AVE
SAN JOSE, CA95125
(408)298-7438
FAILURE TO STOP AT STOP SIGN
[ link to this | view in thread ]