Student Cleared Of Charges She Spammed Teachers At Her University

from the common-sense-prevails dept

Thu, Jan 29th 2009 5:48am — Mike Masnick

Back in December, we wrote about a student at Michigan State University, who was disciplined by the school for spamming, after she sent out an email to all of the professors at the school concerning a schedule change that would impact their class schedules in a future semester. One teacher complained, and the student was found to have violated the school's anti-spam policy, which said you couldn't email more than 30 people at a time. This seemed silly, as the message was clearly not spam in the traditional sense at all. After a widespread public outcry, and the EFF preparing a lawsuit on the student's behalf, the school has backed down and cleared the woman of any wrongdoing, and said that it will review and potentially change its anti-spam policies.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: email, free speech, spam, universities
Companies: michigan state university

21 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2009 @ 6:19am

Another one way street
I assume that their (TBR) policy only aqpplies to the students and not the university. The university probably sent emails to all the students on a routine basis. And the university also (most likely) spams the alumni on a regular basis.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
asdf, 29 Jan 2009 @ 6:31am

Yeah, this was probably some dumb egotistical professor that complained. This is where law should not override common sense.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ima Fish, 29 Jan 2009 @ 6:33am

Re:
"dumb egotistical professor"

A little redundant, don't you think? ;-)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Dan, 29 Jan 2009 @ 6:38am

Re: Re:
Redundant, sure, but also an excellent point and one that is emphasized through it's redundancy.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2009 @ 6:40am

I've actually had a course with this professor and really enjoyed it. That being said I was pretty shocked to discover it was her.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2009 @ 6:55am

Re: Re: Re:
dumb != egotistical

dumb != professor

egotistical != professor

So how the hell is it redundant? Sounds like some people need to go back to school...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2009 @ 7:09am

Re: Re: Re: Re:
dumb egotistical = professor
[ link to this | view in thread ]
pferland (profile), 29 Jan 2009 @ 7:15am

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
I think its more of an oxymoron then anything else
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2009 @ 7:29am

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
I take offense to that. I am friends with a number of professors, and, while there certainly are a number that fit the category of "dumb egotistical professor" many do not.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
dazcon5, 29 Jan 2009 @ 7:37am

AC - offended
1. Tough shit, deal with it.
2. Most of us could care less that you're offended.
3. Get over yourself.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Some IT Guy, 29 Jan 2009 @ 7:46am

Teachers.....
Wow, I can't believe they let some people teach....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Justin, 29 Jan 2009 @ 8:04am

Re: Re: Re: Re:
In a general sence --

egotistical == professor
egotistical == dumb

So you could draw the line that links:

professor == dumb

So ...

Dumb egotistical professor is redundant
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Dan, 29 Jan 2009 @ 8:29am

Re: Re: Re: Re:
It's an implication that all professors are dumb and egotistical, not that dumb = egotistical = professor
[ link to this | view in thread ]
TriZz, 29 Jan 2009 @ 8:54am

Penis
There's way too much penis in this thread than ANYONE should ever have to deal with...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2009 @ 9:31am

spelling
wazzup my nigga, you mispelled ass 12,751 times
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Rockon, 29 Jan 2009 @ 9:31am

Re: Penis
Fucker as bitch?
What?
Fucker isn't an adjective, is it? Is fucker a property of bitch?
Quick, get me an egotistical dumb English professor who specializes in obscenities!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
dude101, 29 Jan 2009 @ 9:47am

Geez. This has got to be one of the dumbest things I've heard of yet. Univerisities generally are not like this and Michigan is obviously an exception to the rule. Since everyone is tossing around the term "teacher" I am wondering what the credentials are of the people involved.

Teachers are not professors. Professors are generally who lectures at a University and most do not 'teach'. If it was a teacher with a BEd degree then all I can is I'm not surprised. Generally, professors are so wrapped up in their research that they rarely have time for such petty complaints. And I know of none that would do such a thing to harm a students career (esp. when they are helping the system).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Mike (profile), 29 Jan 2009 @ 9:53am

Spammer deleted
Sorry for the foul-mouthed spammer... those comments have been deleted. Not surprisingly... the IP address was from a jr. high school, and the quality of his comments reflected that.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
TriZz, 29 Jan 2009 @ 12:49pm

Re: Spammer deleted
Feel free to delete my previous comment regarding the other comment. It has no validity now that the original comments are (rightfully) gone.

...I shouldn't have fed the trolls.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Jasen Webster (profile), 29 Jan 2009 @ 2:07pm

Reject emails
The university should reconfigure their email system. Most have an option to reject emails with more than X recipients. If this is a result of emailing a particular group, then that group should be eliminated or modified to allow allow emails from certain people. These problems occur in the business world as well, but the answer is not discipline, but rather teaching email etiquette.

Instead of modifying the policy for future abusers, why not be proactive and prevent issues like this by reconfiguring their email system?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Andrew D. Todd, 29 Jan 2009 @ 4:23pm

Spammer deleted, #18
To Mike Masnick:

You are of course very patient with some of your correspondents.

A small technical note: It is better to replace the offending message with "Message Deleted" or whatever, so that the comment numbers and URL's of the following comments remain stable.

This is something we've encountered more in the political blogs, because grown men of fifty and sixty sometimes lose their tempers and begin screaming at each other.
[ link to this | view in thread ]