Illinois Legislator Tries To Amend Video Game Law That Was Deemed Unconstitutional
from the but-not-to-fix-it dept
Illinois was one of the early ones in a long list of states that tried and failed to set up anti-video game laws. It was (I think) either the second or third such law to then be thrown out as unconstitutional. Since then, nine or ten more states have all tried and failed to implement similar laws. However, it looks like one legislator in Illinois hasn't been paying much attention. He's trying to add some more clauses to the law, more than three years after it was rejected as unconstitutional. Of course, if he was looking to amend it in a way that fixed the unconstitutional part, you might understand it. But, he's not. He's just adding more restrictions to a law that has been deemed unenforceable. Another great moment in politics.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: illinois, video games
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Senators should be like presidents,
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The book question
I hope and expect that they would be floored, absolutely outraged. Video games are narrative works of art. Like art some of it is not appropriate for minors, and some of it barely deserves the title, but it should be treated the same as a ye olde book.
Any law that tries to say differently is trying to cater to the mothers of precious snowflakes that need protecting.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Senators should be like presidents,
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Senators should be like presidents,
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Wow! That Senator Is Way Out Of Touch
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Bail Me out
[ link to this | view in thread ]
A little Information please
What were the amendments to the law proposed?
What was deemed unconstitutional by the law?
Seriously I know it's techdirt not a pulitzer prize winning publication, but for god sake try to be a LITTLE informative. your links are more clueless than your "articles".
Write a COMPLETE article for once, not this constant half ass attempt at journalism.
I know i'm being harsh but I wanna keep coming back to this site.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
A little Information please
What were the amendments to the law proposed?
What was deemed unconstitutional by the law?
Seriously I know it's techdirt not a pulitzer prize winning publication, but for god sake try to be a LITTLE informative. your links are more clueless than your "articles".
Write a COMPLETE article for once, not this constant half ass attempt at journalism.
I know i'm being harsh but I wanna keep coming back to this site.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Senators should be like presidents,
This sounds like a very reasonable idea.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: A little Information please
Techdirt's a blog for commentary on issues, not a source for reporting on those issues. If this is your main source for reading about said issues, then you're doing it wrong...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
one would think
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: one would think
On the other hand, just look at the judges that decide IP and technology cases, they are appointed for life. One district court judge in South Carolina is over 80, refuses to use computers and becomes motionless, gazing off in the distance during technical testimony.
[ link to this | view in thread ]