Norway Drops Complaint Against Apple Now That Apple Dropped DRM In iTunes
from the no-problem-with-movies-then? dept
We never quite understood Norway's legal attack on Apple for its use of DRM in iTunes. Sure, using DRM was annoying and bad, but users had the choice to buy from iTunes or not, and it didn't make any sense for a government to get involved. That said, it's nice to see the government now drop the complaints after Apple announced it was dropping DRM on music files in iTunes. Still, if Norway is so upset about DRM, why isn't it still pissed off about Apple using DRM in many other areas?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Maybe because "other areas" are your imagination?
"Apple uses DRM to lock iPhones to AT&T and Apple's iTunes App Store; " - US-specific problem.
".. prevent recent iPods from syncing with software other than iTunes .." - what does it have to do with DRM? The only real problem here is that it doesn't work on linux. Take (free) vmware and run (near-free) windows there. Problem solved.
"prevent OS X from loading on generic Intel machines". Not a problem AT ALL. Does Apple have any kind of obligation to support Non-Apple machines? I guess no.
The complains about movies and audiobooks in iTunes are real, but such amount of BS doesn't add credibility.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Maybe because "other areas" are your imagination?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I don't think they did when this thing first came around, at least not in Europe. Any other store that was licensed to sell music by the major labels had Microsoft's DRM and, as we know, Apple wouldn't let anyone else use their DRM.
So, an iPod user either had to use iTunes to buy music digitally (or buy a new MP3 player, in which case their existing DRMed library wouldn't work) or buy a CD (technically a different market so wouldn't be considered by this complaint). That still stands in some ways AFAIK - I'm not aware of any DRM-free major label music retailers that sell in Europe outside of the UK (apart from 7digital, which doesn't cover Norway as yet).
Now that a user is allowed to remove the DRM from their purchased music by Apple themselves (i.e. without the CD workaround) and competitors are also allowed to sell downloads to iPods, it's now a moot point. I suspect that if the competitors were not there, Apple would still be pressured to open up Fairplay, even if they didn't use it themselves.
"Still, if Norway is so upset about DRM, why isn't it still pissed off about Apple using DRM in many other areas?"
One step at a time. There isn't really any competition in Europe for movie or audiobook downloads yet, but I expect that the same complaints will emerge at some point during the future for these items. Now, at least, there's a precedent. The fact that DRM has apparently been dropped from music with no negative repercussions will hopefully act as ammunition when dealing with other content.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
DRM was at issue due to retail license
For example, you can't be the only company in a town that sells gas, and refuse to sell anyone gas if they don't own a Fiat, and then direct them to the local Fiat dealer which you also own.
The license to operate as a Music retailer required them to make music available for comparable devices. Clearly the DRM was technologically optional, not required for players to work. With the DRM being used to lock out other vendors of MP3 players, and as the only distributor of digital music, they were violating the terms of their license.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
edhardy
[ link to this | view in thread ]