David Simon Whines About The State Of Journalism While Undermining His Own Point
from the oops dept
A year ago, David Simon, a former Baltimore Sun reporter, who is now much more well known as the executive producer of the TV show The Wire, complained in the pages of the Washington Post about how awful it was that newspapers were giving away their content for free online. He was confusing value and price -- something that many people do these days. And now he's back with another editorial, where he is again quite confused. The editorial picks up on similar complaints that the newspaper industry's current troubles make it much more difficult to hold public officials accountable. In this case, he's complaining about attempts by the Baltimore Police Department to keep the names of officers involved in violent altercations secret.It's an interesting opinion piece, but it pretty easily undermines its own reason for being. He's talking about a specific story involving a specific police officer, where the police has refused to give out the information identifying the officer. As Simon points out, however, by law that information needs to be made available to everyone, not just reporters. And, in fact, Simon did get the information -- and Simon is not a reporter any more. You know who didn't get the information? The reporters at the Baltimore Sun. So... Simon is complaining that without a strong newspaper business, this information will remain hidden, even though he admits that legally the information needs to be available to non-reporters (like himself) which enabled him to get the information, and that the supposedly necessary newspaper reporters failed in getting the info.
In other words, he just totally debunked his own point. In this case, he was acting as a "citizen journalist," digging up a piece of information because it was of great concern to him. Other citizen journalists could and would do the same thing. Yet, the supposedly very important "newspaper journalists" didn't care enough to follow through and get the info. I'd say he just made a really strong point for why a concerned citizenry is a lot more effective at getting this particular bit of information and publicizing it than the press that he wishes would do it.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: david simon, journalism, reporting
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
citizen journalists = flying elves
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Your point is? I'm 44 and, in my entire life, I've run across "regular" journalists exactly zero times. On the other hand I've run across well known bloggers and citizen journalists more times than I can recall.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Your deep, probing analysis
Secondly, what Simon is saying is subtle, so of course you missed it. He was saying that certain basic facts -- the identity of the officer involved for example -- needed to stay in the public domain where such facts have always -- until now, without a watchdog press -- resided. Only then is it possible for a trained reporter to then work sources, check court files, exercise due diligence in learning the background and experience of the officer. In this case,that is what happened and the background suggested a pattern of some relevance.
The only whining here is you simplifying things to straw-man stature and then flailing about with half-hearted logic.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
partnership would be beneficial to both sides
I would like to see some kind of experiment where a newspaper that didn't have enough resources to cover everything would actually state what information they needed, just to see if regular people would know the answers they needed to make a complete story, or if regular people would go out and find the answers because the story interested them.
For example, if the Sun told its readers that a police officer was involved in this incident that this information was required by law to be given out, and maybe even how to get it, I wonder how many people may have decided that they could do what Simon did.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: partnership would be beneficial to both sides
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Journalists, citizen and otherwise
- My first "real" job as a journalist was writing for my local newspaper, I don't think I was older than 18. The editor took my under his wing there. In addition to giving me an actual ID card for the paper, he presented me a certificate, printed on yellow stock [yellow journalism], labeled "Golden Typewriter." The certificate imparted all the rights, privileges, and responsibilities of a journalist unto me. The joke about the certificate was that it was completely unnecessary.
- Later on as a cop beat reporter at a newspaper in Georgia, I was chatting with one of my police sources at the station one afternoon. Our talk turned to work and at one point he looked at me and said, "Don't you guys have to be licensed or something?" I smiled and said, "Nope."
Of course this was well before the dawn of the Web. Nevertheless, we should work hard to ensure that "citizen journalist" remains a redundant term.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
if the bloggers don't cover this stuff, and the journalists don't either, the question isn't "who is going to cover it?" but "why isn't it being covered anymore?"
that's the problem with news as a saleable product, if no one is buying it, it won't get sold. you will run into this problem no matter who is doing the news.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Celebrity Journalist, more like
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Your deep, probing analysis
Trained reporter? What about a person just being able to go down to the police station and getting a police report? You have to be TRAINED to do THAT?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
trained reporter
This may be a matter of reading comprehension, so let's go through the content of the original article careful and slow:
From the article it is apparent that going down to the police station to get a report was not what broke this particular story. In the past, they would have denied you the report, first of all, and you would have to know enough about Maryland law and have the legal contacts to acquire enough leverage over the police official to pry the document free. That's what Simon recounts.
But most importantly, the document alone was only the beginning. That would give you the name of the officer involved. After that, it was a veteran reporter, working police sources, knowing his beat, and getting people to talk to him about what truly happened in 2005. Remember, the 2005 reports were sanitized by the department. Simon got police sources to tell him what the officer actually did in that incident.
So much for walking into a police station and getting a report. If you tried to acquire the information that was ultimately reported by Simon you wouldn't know who to call first or why they were hanging up on you. A beat reporter, a good one, knows his beat and has sources and uses them effectively. When he's gone, those sources are gone too. And you're standing there, with your thumb in your hole, holding a report full of lies and no context to go with it.
Everyone else's job looks easy when you've never done it. Ignorance is a powerful sumbitch, and knowing what you don't know about a world you've never actually visited is perhaps the first step to honest reckoning.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Back Scratching
But citizen journalists usually have no such relationship with the police department and this is how citizen journalism can trump the newspapers. While the citizen journalist won't get the friendly calls from the department tipping them to stories, they aren't under any obligation to "play along" either and are free to dig for the dirt that the paper won't print.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Your deep, probing analysis
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Citizen Press
Seeking out the facts to post anew the facts we need that are way overdue.
The Wall Street and Wilmington Journal did Order reporters off - the story of two law firms who ripped eToys illegal away while national press did scoff.
Like You Tube, Skype and Twitter all free
One day a google, yahoo news public, massive broadcast we will see.
Buggy whips, like paper news need go their way
For inovation and market demands to have their day.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
State of journalism
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Flying elves is right.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Flying elves is right.
[ link to this | view in thread ]