Google Provides Numbers On Just How Often DMCA Takedown Process Is Abused
from the quite-frequently,-it-appears dept
Some entertainment industry lawyers have been going around lately, pitching a fable that the DMCA isn't really that bad, since bogus takedown notices are somewhat rare. However, some new evidence from Google suggests quite a different story. Reader Slackr points us to some news about Google filing a comment on New Zealand's proposed new copyright law that would kick file sharers offline based on accusations rather than convictions. While New Zealand has agreed to hold off putting the law into place, while it hopes to work out a compromise, the government is accepting submissions from interested parties. While it's interesting alone that Google is participating in the process, even more interesting is what it has to say about its experience with DMCA takedown notices:In its submission, Google notes that more than half (57%) of the takedown notices it has received under the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act 1998, were sent by business targeting competitors and over one third (37%) of notices were not valid copyright claims.Google's point is that these types of laws are widely abused, and setting up such a system where punishment is handed out without any real due process is going to lead to an awful lot of mistakes. But, these stats are worth discussing just for what they say about the DMCA itself, and that myth that the process is rarely abused. From the numbers Google has seen, it's quite clear that the DMCA isn't just abused, it's regularly abused in ways that are both anti-competitive and chilling.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: abuse, dmca, new zealand, takedowns
Companies: google
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I am also confident from experience that maybe 1 out of 100 violations is actually reported to Google for removal. So in reality, the 37% of false claims is a very small number compared to the number of people to intimidated by the process to do it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
flamers and trolls
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
That's exactly what I was thinking. I hope Google douse turn them in.
"I am also confident from experience that maybe 1 out of 100 violations is actually reported to Google for removal. So in reality, the 37% of false claims is a very small number compared to the number of people to intimidated by the process to do it."
Assuming that 1 of 100 is an accurate number and the other 99 are valid, how many of those 99 actually care about the infringing or are like Trent and would rather see the content up?
This also brings up two questions; Out of the one half against competitors, how many are just to stifle competition and not really valid. And, if 1/3 of the claims are invalid and obvious to Google, how many of the other 2/3 are invalid just not obvious (and how many are "valid" yet should not be)?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
but it never worked out my request to have the video removed was always denied...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
So let me get this straight...
2. 37% are otherwise not valid copyright claims.
That suggests 94% of DMCA takedown notices to Google are perjurious. This, in turn, suggests two things:
1. DMCA takedown notices are being widely abused.
2. A bunch of legal departments look ripe for censure or disbarring.
How long before these start happening?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: I'm confident...
>100 violations is actually reported to Google for
>removal. So in reality, the 37% of false claims is a very
>small number compared to the number of people to
>intimidated by the process to do it.
Cool Harold, here's some other made up statistics...
I'm 99.6% confident that 1 out of 345 posts, you posts contain 0.1% kernels of what 4 out of 5 people might consider truth - but only about 51% of the time.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: I'm confident...
Mike, I'm really curious, I know you can't answer this, but does this "Weird Harold" IP actually come from anything linking or is he going through an anon proxy?
It smells too much of intentional RIAA involvement that I wonder who he is directly.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: So let me get this straight...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: So let me get this straight...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: I'm confident...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Unfortunately, there are absolutely no penalties for false claims made in "good faith". You have to prove not just that the claim was false, but that the claimant knew the claim was false when they made it. That's a loophole big enough to sail the Queen Mary through.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
1) from my own experience (your experience may be different)
2) I have worked in the past for an image content company. There are so many violations of copyright that it would be a full time job just to fill out the papers to try to get them taken down.
It's one of those weird things in the world. There is a point where theory is nice, but actual real world experience is important. I am estimating on experience, not speculating out my ass.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: So let me get this straight...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: So let me get this straight...
Like you said, not two numbers that can be added together to extract meaning, except perhaps to have a good rant on a blog.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: So let me get this straight...
It's quite possible that a DMCA notices that falls in the first category but not the second-- it targets a competing company with a valid claim.
The article makes no mention what percentage of these DMCA notices falls in both categories.
My question here is that the article only offer percentages. Is there any mention of the total number of DMCA notices that Google has received? That might shed some light on how frequently this law is (ab)?used.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Assuming the absurd number is correct, which I doubt, I am in the 99%, but not because I am intimidated by the system. Most, if not all, the professionals I work with believe that the utilization of your product in free materials that do not portray in a negative light for noncommercial purposes is actually a good thing. Think of it as free advertising and embedded marketing. It is one thing the media and music industries need to learn. People don't like advertising crammed down their throat, but if a song is used as a theme to an amusing video, they are far more likely to inquire of their own free will about the song (product) and look into purchasing the product.
How many of your 99% fall into the category of people like us?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Meh.
I understand they probably get a lot of these things, but Google has done absolutely nothing to stand up for its users. I'm not talking wacky measures, I'm talking not letting a 15 year old Aussie take stuff down.
OTOH, at least they're saying *something* now. (slow golf clap)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
DMCA
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Having watched this play out in NZ and the Governments refusal to listen to ISPs and technical experts speak out on the stupidity of this law, I'm glad that Google have provided an authoratative challenge to the weaknesses of the law as it stands.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Google Provides Numbers...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The actual report
The numbers cited in the press seem to come from here:
57% of notices sent to Google to demand removal of links in the index were sent by businesses targeting apparent competitors;
37% of the notices sent to Google targeted sites apparently outside the United States.
which is, of course, just one possible reason why a claim could be invalid.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
And regardless of your experience, you are still speculating "out your ass" about the real world numbers. Since Google likely deals with a few hundred thousand times more notices than you have dealt with in the "image content company" you speak of, I trust them a lot more to know how the system is abused, especially since you seem to be a clueless apologist for the current ass-backward copyright system.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
(it's older, but that single site was responsible for thousands upon thousands of violations before resolution was found, http://www.citmedialaw.org/threats/x17-inc-v-lavandeira )
That is one site on tens if not hundreds of thousands of celeb sites and pages using content without permission, often not dealt with because they are too small, or the content comes from people such as yourself.
I gather you are not a producer of images, but of something that might be in an image. That is a different ball of wax, because yes, widespread viewing of your image would likely do you good (and not cost you anything). But if you are a photographer in the business of shooting images, every non-permitted use is a potential loss of income or value.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Do no evil, unless it's good for google.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
That are never enforced. That's the nice thing about having the government in your pocket like the entertainment industry does.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Who cares?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: DMCA FASLE CLAIMS NOT PROSECUTED
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
At least the 37% have a fair to middling chance of being merely incompetent
PS Harold - I just noticed bluecoat blocks your blog as pornography, ah the irony ;0)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Amazing Data
[ link to this | view in thread ]