Yes, A Newspaper Can Survive If It Focuses On The Community
from the well,-look-at-that... dept
When it comes to newspaper business models, we've been saying over and over again that the problem has never been about "free" vs. "paid" but the fact that newspapers have never done a very good job enabling their communities. It comes from the fact that many newspapers incorrectly think they're in the business of selling news to people. That's never really been true. They've always been in the business of selling their community to advertisers. And if they do things to drive that community away (or to fail to keep up with other, competing communities) they shouldn't be surprised that their business disappears as well.As evidence of how focusing on the community can work wonders for newspapers, just check out this recent column by David Carr (who just a week or so ago had jumped on board the "all newspapers should collude to start charging" bandwagon). In it, Carr talks about the success of the Austin Chronicle, the local newspaper in Texas that has been able to weather the "newspaper business model crisis" just fine while (get this!) giving away its newspapers for free. But, it's also built up the famous South by Southwest event that just happened in Austin, and has become a huge community builder for Austin. In fact, many now identify the city with SxSW -- and that only helps the Chronicle. While others are shutting down, the Austin Chronicle isn't looking to lay anyone off. Business is off a bit due to the general downturn, but the paper doesn't have massive debts and seems to have a really loyal following among locals who recognize the overall value it adds to the community. Meanwhile, it's the newspapers that haven't bothered to really connect with their communities that are suddenly demanding those community members pay -- and are suddenly offended when people tell them "no thanks"?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: austin, community, newspapers, south by southwest
Companies: austin chronicle
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
ON TOPIC:
A newspaper or two can easily get away with this, but not all will. I think what's missing in these articles is the competition between newspapers within one area.
There's no way consumers are going to buy 6 papers just to read about community events. Eventually, this model could lead to contractual agreements between a community event (sponsor) and the newspaper, leaving all others out.
But, admittedly, newspapers are still the cheapest way to wrap garbage.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
There is power in connecting people
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Not sure, but maybe another example
[ link to this | view in thread ]
It's not that newspapers failed to connect.
In a lot of cases modern management techniques temporarily improved the bottom line, but in the process the newspaper often lost that "gut instinct" management style that had kept it connected. For example, in most cases it is cheaper to buy content than it is to write about local issues, so the paper fills space with purchased content and skips refilling a local reporter slot. It makes sense financially, but in the process the community connection was lost.
I think one of the real problems newspapers have is that for they were using bought content. Now that bought content is available through other sources, and their customers have moved on.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Newspapers got lazy. Reporters forgot how to report.
Nostalgic is right. They lost their connection and now they are paying the price. Nice to see a paper that actually has a clue.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
A Newspaper for the People
[ link to this | view in thread ]
You can think of the Austin Chronicle as a "real" newspaper like the Tribune or Sun-Times. RedEye isn't a good comparison -- there's a free paper in Austin called the Reader that fills a similar niche to the RedEye, full of local listings &c.
---
I can't imagine one of the Chicago papers being put out for free, especially given the Sun-Times' price hike. I had no idea the Chronicle was free -- how long has that been the case?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Valley Voice
Their website isn't pretty, but gives an idea of the paper's coverage. Don't forget to check the 'Second Front Page.'
http://www.valleyvoicenewspaper.com/
Sam Hunt,
Visalia, CA
[ link to this | view in thread ]
If the newspaper becomes a community participant/organizer what's the supposed benefit of competition within a community?
If being the nucleus of a community is the future of newspapers competition isn't going to work the same way as between two producers of some other good.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Austin Chronicle
Of course, we can put it a little more in perspective if we note that Texas is planning on fighting back against evolutionary teaching by requiring creationism in their textbooks - though that doesn't detract from the quality of your post.
And, by the way, I was born in Texas (but then, I was born in the US; which invaded Iraq without provocation after electing a moron as President!).
[ link to this | view in thread ]