Is The Idea Of Embracing 'Piracy' Finally Going Mainstream?
from the about-frickin'-time dept
For many years, a small group of people has been trying to explain to the world of folks who freak out about "piracy" that there really are tons of opportunities in not trying to prevent it, but simply flipping it around, and using it to your own advantage as a part of your business model. The steps to doing so really aren't that difficult, but since many people have a natural aversion to "piracy," it's sometimes difficult for people to see beyond the big fat "free" to the huge opportunity right behind it.Might that finally be changing?
MIT's Technology Review has an article about how a variety of companies are finally starting to push the idea that content providers should embrace piracy, and put together business models that take advantage of what piracy really can be: a free input into a larger business model, that provides free promotion and free distribution, while enabling a number of new (previously impossible) business models. Nothing in the article will be all that new to folks who've been around here for a while -- but it's somewhat encouraging to see the concept getting slightly more widespread acceptance.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Actually, it CAN happen.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Yeah, right
[ link to this | view in thread ]
My personal opinion
I know Weird Harold will probably disagree with me about this, but Ghosts I-IV was *ALL* released under a CC license that allowed unlimited non-commercial copying. According to the RIAA nobody will pay for music if they can get it for free. According to Amazon, Ghosts I-IV was the top selling album for 2008 even though anyone who wanted it could easily and _legally_ download the whole series via any p2p network. If they RIAA's assertion were correct nobody would have bought Ghosts, they'd all have gone to thepiratebay and downloaded it for free.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Actually, it CAN happen.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
and start focusing on giving some good advice to the mammals...
this post could be a pretty good start on that new focus, mike...
oh sure, you're still using the dinosaur-laden term of "piracy"...
but you go on to say this:
> take advantage of what piracy really can be:
> a free input into a larger business model,
> that provides free promotion and free distribution,
> while enabling a number of new (previously impossible)
> business models.
free promotion and free distribution. excellent.
see how easy it can be to flip things over to the mammal view?
remind the new species how they can use the system to benefit:
if you offer stuff freely, your audience experiences zero friction
contemplating a pre-consumption "is this worth money to me?"
and if -- post-consumption -- they decide it _is_ worth money,
they can still find some way to slip some money into your pocket,
to show their appreciation for your gift by reciprocating some cash.
they can also do _promotion_ for you by talking you up to friends,
and even "paying it forward" by distributing your work _for_ you...
when artists come to realize all the ways they can benefit from this,
and fans come to realize they are an essential part of the equation,
both sides of the relationship will benefit by strengthening the bond.
and society itself will be healthier as a result of this gift-exchange...
concentrate on _this_, mike, not on the dinosaurs. they're doomed.
there's no sense wasting your time and energy on them any more...
-bowerbird
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Yeah, right
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Paradigm Shift
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Doesn't anyone remember the dot com bust? The only survivor of the slaughter is NetZero, and they now are 10 hours a month of "free".
Using piracy to save bandwidth costs? heh, who will pay for the license when they find the serial/crack in the torrent, and who will want to download a torrent without the serial/crack inside?
Value added services added onto "free" base products works very rarely when you have customers (Fortune 500s) that MUST HAVE the value-added services, for example B2B Tech Support and SLAs for FOSS (Redhat business model). 99% of consumers have no needed for value-added services along with entertainment media. Tech support doesn't exist for entertainment media, autographs already have a market, custom mixes quickly wind up on P2P, artists aren't going to get personal with fans since they risk being ripped apart limb to limb by obsessive fans, concerts already exist on their own, renting an artist for private live performance already exists. Name a real business model for "free" entertainment media.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Quick
Sometimes I feel like I am the only one sending emails (or form fill outs on their stupid pages) to our US government representatives (senators, legislators, the president's office) saying how stupid copyright is and how much it hurts the public.
We want our culture back.
The internet and technology advances.
Adapt or die bitches.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
"There are ways to protect your store in a riot. If you see looting going on, don't call police or try to stop it, it will only bring you the crowd's ire. Instead, unlock the door to your shop, how the door open, and let them have at it. They will empty out your entire inventory and trash the inside of your store, but at least they won't break the windows!"
Sage advice from people who don't own stores.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
In the situation given, you know that the rioters are going to get in and steal everything. You know the police won't get there in time to stop it. And you know that a locked door will only lead to them breaking the windows. So open the door and save your windows.
And when the rioters leave, nothing has been stolen (remember...copies are made. originals are not taken), and your windows aren't broken. And best of all, some of those rioters are going to say "hey, I liked that shop. I'm going to come back tomorrow and buy something legitimately."
Win-Win!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
But if you aren't capitalizing on that desire, then you have a problem with your business model.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
If there is a desire for a product, people must pay for it, not steal it. That's why we have laws in place - except of course, on the Internet.
"And if they keep coming back for more? Then that means you obviously have a desirable product that consumers want."
Of course consumers will keep coming back for more, especially if they don't have to pay for their desired product.
"But if you aren't capitalizing on that desire, then you have a problem with your business model."
But of course. It's always a problem with the business model, isn't it?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]