IBM's Watson Aims To Prove Its Intelligence On Jeopardy!

from the the-only-winning-move-is-not-to-play? dept

Tue, Apr 28th 2009 2:22am — Michael Ho

The world of supercomputing and artificial intelligence has always been fascinated with games like chess, Go and poker -- where evaluating strategies for winning could be approached using vast computational resources. Another historical challenge for AI projects is the classic Turing Test, which requires an understanding of human communication in order to pass the test. So it's interesting to see IBM starting a project called Watson (named after IBM's founder, not Sherlock's assistant) to create a computer to compete on Jeopardy! against human contestants -- because doing so combines the goals of natural language processing and strategic game planning.

Obviously, though, Watson is more of a product demonstration than a serious research project to advance the field of computer science, but it's still a brilliant move, nonetheless, since the effort can be understood by anyone who watches popular game shows, and at the same time, the project studies a practical problem for algorithms. However, the game of Jeopardy! is somewhat trivial (no pun intended, honest) since Jeopardy's given answers all have matching questions -- and it doesn't really require true comprehension to guess (apparently, human contestants respond correctly about 85% of the time). Granted, Jeopardy! is a bit harder to play than Who Wants To Be A Millionaire, but Alex Trebek doesn't seem quite as computationally demanding as search engines can be (unless you count the audio/video Daily Doubles?). Still, IBM should be applauded for supporting its research as eye-catching PR campaigns -- while other companies like Microsoft are getting more attention for downsizing their research divisions.

Filed Under: ai, jeopardy
Companies: ibm

12 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 28 Apr 2009 @ 5:09am

Is there a time limit on choosing the next question?

I would read the article, but it is NYT - registration
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 28 Apr 2009 @ 5:19am

"Still, IBM should be applauded for supporting its research as eye-catching PR campaigns -- while other companies like Microsoft are getting more attention for downsizing their research divisions."

IBM recently cut 5000 US employees. Transferring jobs and customer accounts to India/Brazil/Malaysia.... They are a horrible corporate citizen and are led entirely by self serving greedy executives who only care enough to keep IBM afloat to continue to line their own pockets.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 28 Apr 2009 @ 5:25am

Re:
"led entirely by self serving greedy executives who only care enough ... to continue to line their own pockets."

Isn't this SOP in the business world?
I think it is covered in BUS 101.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
CastorTroy-Libertarian, 28 Apr 2009 @ 5:27am

And so Sky-net is born...

Sorry some one had to say it :)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Brad Allen, 28 Apr 2009 @ 6:39am

IBM's Watson Aims To Prove Its Intelligence On Jeopardy!
Sorry, This entire story has been outsouced. No coverage in the USA.

Thats ok though IBM will still make money.(For those of you that dont get it that is called sarcasm)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Tgeigs, 28 Apr 2009 @ 6:39am

Hmmm
Unless Watson says things like "Suck it, Trebek" or "Moo, that's the sound your mother made last night", I'll leave the Jeapordy to my Grandmother...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Alejandro, 28 Apr 2009 @ 6:51am

IBM vs MS
We are talking about IBM here, a real IT enterprise that could be defined one of a very small group of companies that founded the IT world as we know today. Microsoft, instead... IMHO has very little to say about innovation. It's a shame that young people tend to see MS as "God" and didn't even know about Big Blue. Or am I getting old?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 28 Apr 2009 @ 8:01am

Re:
Delete your cookies or sign up. Either way... come on man
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Chris, 28 Apr 2009 @ 10:02am

This isn't new
I don't understand why this is new. If you've ever played any of the Jeopardy! video games (I used to on the Playstation 1), you can play with 1 or 2 players, and the remaining players are played by the computer. I don't see what's so exciting about this.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
mikeho, 28 Apr 2009 @ 10:27am

Re: This isn't new
The existing Jeopardy! video game presumably "cheats" by having access to both the questions and answers -- so the computer player can get get any percentage of responses correct that it is programmed to.

Watson isn't rigged in that way. This Watson computer system will try to interpret the answers and come up with its own answers, so that it's playing fairly against human contestants. It's possible that the program will just guess gibberish and only occasionally get a correct response.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anurakshat Gupta, 29 Apr 2009 @ 7:27am

Project Watson
This IS exciting.
We at International Quizzing Association are very excited by this development. This should be quite a challenge in future.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Feb 2011 @ 5:33am

Now that watson has won jeopardy it time for him to win who wants to be a millionaire(get regis to host it).

More Watson appearances=more people running World community grid. It's a shame they never took a few minutes to talk about WCG instead of Watson on jeopardy.
http://www.itnewsonline.com/showprnstory.php?storyid=144786
[ link to this | view in thread ]