Apple's Arbitrary Rejects Hit Nine Inch Nails App
from the bizarre dept
We've covered plenty of examples of Apple's rather arbitrary decision/approval process for putting apps in the iPhone App Store -- demonstrating a huge opportunity for other phone providers to be more open and less ridiculous. We've also talked plenty about Trent Reznor and how Nine Inch Nails is doing all sorts of unique things to connect with fans -- including a fantastically well thought out iPhone app that got lots of well-deserved attention.However, those two things clashed this weekend, when Apple suddenly rejected the latest version of the iPhone app for very murky reasons:
We've reviewed nin: access and determined that we cannot post this version of your iPhone application to the App Store at this time because it contains objectionable content which is in violation of Section 3.3.12 from the iPhone SDK Agreement which states:Except... it's not at all clear what the actual problem is. As Reznor notes, the album "The Downward Spiral" (one of NIN's most popular albums) is not available on the app itself, though the song "The Downward Spiral" is apparently found somewhere in a podcast that can be streamed from the app. But, as Reznor later points out, the same song can be easily bought on iTunes, so it's difficult to see what possible objection Apple could have.
"Applications must not contain any obscene, pornographic, offensive or defamatory content or materials of any kind (text, graphics, images, photographs, etc.), or other content or materials that in Apple's reasonable judgement may be found objectionable by iPhone or iPod touch users."
The objectionable content referenced in this email is "The Downward Spiral". Since the app is live on the App store, please make the necessary changes to the application as soon as possible, and resubmit your binary to iTunes Connect. Thank you
I'll voice the same issue I had with Wal-Mart years ago, which is a matter of consistency and hypocrisy. Wal-Mart went on a rampage years ago insisting all music they carry be censored of all profanity and "clean" versions be made for them to carry. Bands (including Nirvana) tripped over themselves editing out words, changing album art, etc to meet Wal-Mart's standards of decency - because Wal-Mart sells a lot of records. NIN refused, and you'll notice a pretty empty NIN section at any Wal-Mart. My reasoning was this: I can understand if you want the moral posturing of not having any "indecent" material for sale - but you could literally turn around 180 degrees from where the NIN record would be and purchase the film "Scarface" completely uncensored, or buy a copy of Grand Theft Auto where you can be rewarded for beating up prostitutes. How does that make sense?
You can buy The Downward Fucking Spiral on iTunes, but you can't allow an iPhone app that may have a song with a bad word somewhere in it. Geez, what if someone in the forum in our app says FUCK or CUNT? I suppose that also falls into indecent material. Hey Apple, I just got some SPAM about fucking hot asian teens THROUGH YOUR MAIL PROGRAM. I just saw two guys having explicit anal sex right there in Safari! On my iPhone!
Come on Apple, think your policies through and for fuck's sake get your app approval scenario together.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: app store, iphone, nine inch nails, trent reznor
Companies: apple
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I was going to send this in...
When the hell will people quit bitching about Apple's business actions and find other sources which don't restrict creativity?
Idiotic hypocrisy.
Trent, before you support this company via another Apple product purchase, maybe this will get you to stop and ask yourself if you really want to bed yourself with this company.
Especially since they've agreed to screw over customers with the new $1.30 song price.
Go whine elsewhere, please. Stick to your innovations in connecting with fans and forget this company as a source.
But I do agree about your comment regarding WinMo.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: I was going to send this in...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: I was going to send this in...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: I was going to send this in...
I believe he answers that question (and you even reference to it!)
I just wish I liked his music more.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Apple users:
Bend over, smile, and smoke a cigarette cuz you just got f'ed.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: I was going to send this in...
apparently you did!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: I was going to send this in...
Yes, they can. It's called a boycott, and if people like Trent quit whining about instead of doing something about it, things usually change.
But given the incredibly small distribution windows available to artists and consumers, you do drive a good point.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
same argument new day, hahah pull your thumb out of your butt and wash your hands. some of us like the reliability of OSX over Vist XP or Linux. Cant afford a Mac? go get a job!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Smart man
[ link to this | view in thread ]
same applies to windows and the majority of companies, open your Xbox, then try to send it in for repair, you know what will happen.. DENIED
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: I was going to send this in...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The more things change
The more they stay the same.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Stupid Apple
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: I was going to send this in...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
hahaha .. if you say so
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
some of us like the reliability of OSX over Vist XP or Linux. Cant afford a Mac? go get a job!
I have a job, can afford a Mac and choose not too. My Windoze PC runs just as if not more so reliable than your Mac. Of course that's what I do for a living and I don't destroy my system everyday like most moronic Mac users would do to a PC. Cause lets face it, all Mac really does is dumb it down for the lowest common denominator so they can't break it. ie... very little hardware support, very small amount of software/games support etc.
Eitherway, I'd never pay the Apple hardware tax, if I really wanted to run OS X (which I don't) I'd just get an EFi-X device and use it on the same hardware that Mac's use but for 1/4 the price.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Bragging Rights
They've been receiving a lot of crap, especially from Apple-fans. But suddenly, Apple leaves the confines of their design/program/manufacture/control business model and they fall flat on their face.
Microsoft has been dealing with this stuff for years and the Windows market, say what you will about quality, is LEAGUES more varied and vibrant than the Apple market.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
yeah it was all about quality with jordache jeans and members only jackets too
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Bragging Rights
I have thought for years they should do a spoof of the original apple 1984 adds (the irony of it is just soo easy)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I was going to send this in...
I suspect Apple's agreement explicitly states that the criteria for inclusion can change at any time and for any reason. Apple is essentially the syndicator here; they can decide what they want to put on their "airwaves" for any reason at all, up to and including individual tastes.
Reznor's argument does not go to consitency in any case -- the comparisons with what you can buy in a store, or what you can get via a browser, are spurious and whiney: "waah waah let my app in or I'll say bad words!"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Apple hasn't changed
[ link to this | view in thread ]
His response
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
how does laughing your @ss off say everything one needs to know about your typical Apple fanboy. if laughing is your response, you may want to lower the dosage of your medication, that should help
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
How is talking about the way Apple does business unrelated to an article about Apple erroneously rejecting an iphone app?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The more people who stand up against "I" (store, phone) the better it is for Androis, Symbian, Blackberry, Palm (PRE)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
its funny how all the apple haters come out to complain about something not related to the article...
its funny how all the apple fanboys come out to apologize for everything related to the article...
There, fixed that for ya
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: His response
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: I can build the same PC for blah blah blah
No DB, the argument used to be 64bit, SCSI blah blah. Which they were correct, in the past the hardware was better. Now you pay much more and get much less. FACE IT. Apple users are being ripped off.OSX is ok. I support MAC's everyday, I have a MacBookPro, and it is damn nice hardware, BUT I PAID A PREMIUM FOR PC HARDWARE WITH AN APPLE LOGO. Dont kid yourself, MACS crash. I have a bunch of kernel panic pics to prove it. AC it appears you are just a punk.
"reliability of OSX" OVER LINUX? BLAHHHHH! you are a complete useless tool.
Vista is a beautiful OS PERIOD.Been running it since RC1 and love it. Dont cry because your hardware is outdated.
A+, NET+, MCSE, MCSA, Altiris NS/DS/SVS, ARD, VMWare Server ESX/GSX, Symantec Endpoint Protection Server.
What? Whats that AC? No thanks I do not want fries with that.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I was going to send this in...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: AC=Troll
[ link to this | view in thread ]
NINX
Fans wouldn't all download the distro (eg, LiveCD) and run it, but many would look at it and start talking about it. NINX could be one of the first music groups to tap into the future. In five years they would have a personal distribution channel to their fans plus have extra appeal and market share for being one of the first.
Call you own shots. Help your fans stand out.
Do you NINX?
[ link to this | view in thread ]