UK Looks To Increase Fines For Copyright Infringement By 10X
from the seems-a-bit-much dept
Just as many in the US are arguing that ridiculously high statutory fines for copyright infringement are at odds with any sense of fairness, it looks like the UK may be going in the other direction. Specifically, it's set to increase fines for criminal infringement by a factor of 10, from £5,000 to £50,000. The only good thing is that the government rejected the idea that jailtime should be an option too. However, the process by which it came up with the new fines is pretty questionable as well. It asked for comments, and (of course) industry reps pushed for fines as high as possible. Since the general public doesn't pay nearly as much attention to such things, there was very little opposition -- though some pointed out that rather than setting a statutory rate, wouldn't it make sense to actually set fines based on how much actual damage is done. That seems like a good idea, but apparently it's easier to just use huge fines.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, fines, infringement, uk
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
They can't be serious
Who even has that much money, get real people.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
They are serious
That'll teach them.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Copyright
[ link to this | view in thread ]
10,000 Songs
If I download 10,000 songs illegally the fine will be $756.6 BILLION?
Yet, if I bounce a check - the most I am liable for is 3 times the face value.
How is the infringement fine even remotely fair? Aren't punishments supposed to fit the crime?
These fines are impossible to pay without a government bailout.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The problem is the context of the law
When the copyright fine was put in place, it was done in the context of mass copying, people copying someone elses book to undercut the cost of the book for instance. This was a big deal because the cost of a book is vary little but the cost of the content could be a lot.
This worked through CDs DVDs etc because in some places the vary plant that pressed legal disks also pressed illegial ones (china does this a lot). In every case I've brought up there was a profit motive. In fact the context of the law was to prevent the profit motive.
Since Profit is no longer the motive we've got a law written for a differnt time still in place. Whats worse, its easly abused because those with money can force those with out money to go to court and face fees. Some of the people geting picked on are so poor no settlement would be payable and you would probley just drive them to bankrupcy.
Ultimatly the issue is how much value we as a culture want to put on our music, Right now we put a value of 1 dollar per ~3 min of music. BUT because of anti-bootleging laws on the books, 3 min of music is worth up to $250,000.
The only outcome from this will be the ability to bankrupt anyone you like just by charging them for infringment (with out any proof) to send a message thats been lost for far to long.
O yes, and if you feel like taking me to court for infringment Ill show up with out a lawyer, pleade that there is no way for me to pay (both for a lawyer and any settlement) and that its currently not possable to get a job. You cant get blood out of a stone nor can you get money out of a poor college student.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
It's the UK
[ link to this | view in thread ]
OH! Yes you can. It is called a judgment.
Just plan on working for the next 45 years with all income above subsistence going to satisfy the judgment.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Copyright
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: The problem is the context of the law
You get blood out of a stone if it's sharp and you squeeze hard enough.
..or, so I'm told.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Increase fines
Where would any opposition come from, let alone effective opposition? Any wonder the populace haven't any interest? What's the point? They can't do anything about it anyway. If they try making any noise, they're promptly put away and silenced in these socialist democracies.
That's why taxes in those places are amongst the highest in the world -- to pay for more bureaucrats, bigger govt, and more inept social programs that nobody wants and wouldn't need if not to pay the taxes [for same]...
VRP
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Rubbish
[ link to this | view in thread ]