DailyDirt: Bioengineered Microbes Are Growing Our Way

from the urls-we-dig-up dept

Scientists haven't quite figured out everything about the genetic code of living things on Earth, but plenty of folks are tinkering with genetic engineering and creating some interesting results. Here are just a few neat projects with some modified microbes. By the way, StumbleUpon can recommend some good Techdirt articles, too.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: bacteria, biology, evolution machine, genetic engineering, lasers, microbes


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. icon
    Keith_Emperor_of_Penguins (profile), 19 Oct 2011 @ 5:11pm

    "The technique of steganography by printed arrays of microbes (SPAM) sounds like the nerdiest way to send a message. Using bacteria to encode secret messages could also be another interesting method for lots of copies keeps stuff safe"

    Good Lord! That sounds like a Germophobic Copyright Shill's worst nightmare

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. icon
    Michael Ho (profile), 19 Oct 2011 @ 6:52pm

    Re:

    Just wait until this SPAM technique is combined with offers for erectile disfunction drugs... SPAM Spam. (Eggs? And spam)

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Rekrul, 20 Oct 2011 @ 12:36am

    Why would anyone think that using organic matter to encode messages is a good idea?

    Microbes grow, reproduce, die, etc.

    Organic technology is popular in science fiction, but is it really practical?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. icon
    Michael Ho (profile), 20 Oct 2011 @ 2:46pm

    Re:

    Why would anyone think that using organic matter to encode messages is a good idea?

    Stuff written on paper can be erased, burned, photocopied...

    All information is subject to accidental destruction, right? The DNA of microbes contains some of the oldest information of life for our planet... so why not try to store information in DNA? The problem might be that the message could get corrupted, but is the rate of DNA corruption that much faster than other storage media?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Rekrul, 20 Oct 2011 @ 5:20pm

    Re: Re:

    Stuff written on paper can be erased, burned, photocopied...

    All information is subject to accidental destruction, right? The DNA of microbes contains some of the oldest information of life for our planet... so why not try to store information in DNA? The problem might be that the message could get corrupted, but is the rate of DNA corruption that much faster than other storage media?


    True that paper copies can be accidentally destroyed, but with bacteria, can the message still be read if the bacteria dies off? Maybe the delivery van was parked in the sun and the internal temperature went up to 120 degrees, cooking the microbes. Or maybe the letter gets irradiated as an intentional effort to kill off bacteria. Didn't they start doing that after the anthrax scares? Is the message still the same if the bacteria multiplies?

    It just seems that organic matter is too unpredictable to be a reliable way to hold a message.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. icon
    Michael Ho (profile), 20 Oct 2011 @ 6:10pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    I'm not exactly sure how they've encoded the messages in DNA (tl;dr), but the DNA itself shouldn't be destroyed when the bacteria die off (unless those dead bacteria are consumed by other organisms which chemically break down the encoded-message DNA)...

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.