El Efecto Streisand As Guatemala Arrests Twitterer
from the it's-going-international dept
Apparently, down in Guatemala, there's an ongoing political scandal, involving murder, corruption and a big local bank. The whole thing sounds rather unpleasant. Earlier this week, a Guatemalan Twitter user, named Jean Anleu, suggested via Twitter that people should pull their money out of the bank, rather than support the corruption. This seems like a pretty standard Twitter message. Yet, in Guatemala, it resulted in the arrest of the guy for "intent to incite financial panic." Apparently, all within the same day, the guy was brought before a judge, had a trial, and was sentenced, with a large fine. Until he can pay off the fine, he's to remain in detention.This sounds oddly familiar, of course. It was just a few months ago that South Korea arrested a blogger under similar charges, though (thankfully) that guy was acquitted. Except, in this case, it seems a bit more serious, especially when there appear to have been murders of those who were trying to fight the bank's corruption, and charges that those murders were done with government support.
But, what's interesting is that the news is spreading wide and fast that the government has arrested this Twitter user, turning international attention on the country and what it's doing with this guy. Boing Boing even points out that Central American news organizations are referring to "el efecto streisand" to describe how much attention this is generating. As the guy who coined the term "the Streisand Effect," in the first place, I have to admit some amount of pride in discovering that the term is being used in foreign headlines in other languages -- though I wish the actual details of this guy's arrest weren't so clearly an attempt to crack down on gov't criticism.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: el efecto streisand, free speech, guatemala, streisand effect
Companies: twitter
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Bad deal...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The point?
I would argue that since technology (i.e. twitter) has such a large potential audience the "harmless" statement could have more weight. and that he could have indeed caused(or in this case attempted to cause) a run on the bank. It would be similar to telling the person next to you there was a fire verse shouting it in the movie theater(when there was no fire of course). The latter would be causing a public panic. With the increase in communication possibilities we should be responsible for larger potential audiences as well.
Though I agree that it seems due process was not a part of this proceeding and the hastiness that this was done is shocking.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: The point?
Mike can clarify if needed, but it seems to me the point is that somebody said something innocuous, but because it was on Twitter it first led to an arrest for inciting a riot amongst the cyber-masses and then to the Streisand Effect for the arrest.
"I would argue that since technology (i.e. twitter) has such a large potential audience the "harmless" statement could have more weight. and that he could have indeed caused(or in this case attempted to cause) a run on the bank"
Ok, so what quantity is the breaking point where we need to arrest? Is it an amount that could be reached by yelling really, really loud? Or using a megaphone? How about when some assclown like the Mad Money jackass starts spouting off about this stuff? He certainly reaches a lot of people.
"It would be similar to telling the person next to you there was a fire verse shouting it in the movie theater(when there was no fire of course)."
I disagree. I think it would be more like telling people in a crowded theatre that the theatre wasn't up to fire code and if there was a fire, everyone would be in a lot of danger, so maybe they should all just leave instead.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Thanks
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Hey Mike, are you going to sue for copyright infringement :D
[ link to this | view in thread ]