Another Court Ruling In Spain Finds Personal File Sharing To Be Legal

from the no-profit-motive dept

While the entertainment industry has been working over time to try to stop file sharing in Spain, court ruling after court ruling has found that personal file sharing is perfectly reasonable and legal -- and that sites that merely link to content rather than host it (i.e., search engines and trackers) aren't breaking copyright law either. In the latest such case, a judge found that a guy who downloaded and shared over 3,000 movies wasn't violating copyright law, because it was all for personal use with no intent to profit.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: file sharing, legality, personal use, spain


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. icon
    Tgeigs (profile), 2 Jun 2009 @ 6:17am

    Hello. My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my file sharing. Prepare to die.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Steven Randal, 2 Jun 2009 @ 6:22am

    comment

    The times have changed and it's time for the record and movie companies to face the facts. Good article!

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. icon
    minijedimaster (profile), 2 Jun 2009 @ 6:41am

    Re:

    LOL, nice.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. icon
    Rebel Freek (profile), 2 Jun 2009 @ 7:05am

    Re:

    lol

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Korrosive, 2 Jun 2009 @ 7:11am

    LOL

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. icon
    Kevin Stapp (profile), 2 Jun 2009 @ 7:16am

    Re:

    *giggle*

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. icon
    Kevin Stapp (profile), 2 Jun 2009 @ 7:18am

    Interesting. If you download a 'legal' copy of a movie or song while in Spain then come back to the USA, is your copy a legal copy?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  8. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 2 Jun 2009 @ 7:22am

    LOL!

    Is Spain a safe harbor now? If torrent sites, fans, and filesharers aren't punished there, won't this really let the cat out of the bag?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  9. icon
    Designerfx (profile), 2 Jun 2009 @ 7:23am

    Re:

    good question, although likely the argument would be a: where you reside is your jurisdiction vs b: where you performed the act was legal thus it is.

    Most courts tend to go with B, as that happens in many situations such as when laws of one state conflict with another. It's pretty well established, and it's unfortunately why things like tax avoidance via overseas are not pursued in court often.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  10. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 2 Jun 2009 @ 7:41am

    Because is not for profit and 270 million € has already been paid in advance.
    There is a leave in CD, DVD, Hard Disk, Mobile Phones, MP3 players.... calculated so at least that amount is obtained by the collection agencies to be "distributed" among the authors to compensate them from the personal not for profit copies.

    And if they get more than that they are suppose to tell us so we reduce it in a couple of year but no need to show us the accounts we have confidence that the collection agencies would never cheat.

    Like getting the money for it and try to send the people to jail at the same time.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  11. icon
    madjo (profile), 2 Jun 2009 @ 8:19am

    Re:

    Yes, the collection agency want to eat their cake and still have it.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  12. icon
    CStrube (profile), 2 Jun 2009 @ 8:28am

    Anyone know a good open proxy in Spain?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  13. identicon
    Your Mamma, 2 Jun 2009 @ 8:54am

    Its about friggin time

    Its about time!!!!

    link to this | view in thread ]

  14. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 2 Jun 2009 @ 9:14am

    "because it was all for personal use with no intent to profit."

    This is what crosses my mind when I think of copyright laws. How and why are you going after people that do not "steal" your stuff when they aren't making money off of it?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  15. icon
    The Infamous Joe (profile), 2 Jun 2009 @ 9:59am

    Re:

    Because they feel that every person who downloads for free would have paid if they couldn't download for free. Therefore, the sale was lost due to 'piracy'.

    Furthermore, they think, if 'piracy' were gone they'd have made $20 off of you, but since 'piracy' is a viable option, they are making $0 off of you. So you "stole" $20 from them.

    Even worse, because you didn't pay them the $20 you would have paid them had the internet never been created you owe them $150,000.

    Per song.

    It's horribly flawed to the point of insanity, but that's their story and they're sticking to it.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  16. identicon
    Simon, 2 Jun 2009 @ 10:16am

    Re: Re:

    Additionally, you took the $20 you didn't pay them, shredded it and then burnt it. Thus damaging the whole economy.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  17. icon
    Tgeigs (profile), 2 Jun 2009 @ 10:33am

    Re: Re: Re:

    Plus they're fairly certain you're a sheep-humping transvestite...

    link to this | view in thread ]

  18. identicon
    Jason, 2 Jun 2009 @ 10:54am

    Re:

    EVERYBODY SING WITH ME!!:

    Yo ho, haul together
    hoist the colors high...

    link to this | view in thread ]

  19. identicon
    hegemon13, 2 Jun 2009 @ 12:10pm

    Re: Re:

    It also goes the other way. One can legally buy marijuana in Amsterdam, but they can't then bring it back to the US and have it be legal. An 18-year-old can buy beer in Germany, but they can't bring it back to the US. So, it depends. In the US, is possession of infringing copies a crime, or just distribution? That has not been absolutely decided in court, but the outcome would determine the answer here.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  20. icon
    Rebel Freek (profile), 2 Jun 2009 @ 12:59pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    With the ability to run through their studios naked holding a dead baby in one hand and a burning bible in the other.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  21. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 2 Jun 2009 @ 3:00pm

    Last laugh to the media companies, who are collecting the "tarif" on blank media and the like.

    Nothing is free. That is just an illusion, making you not see the cost because you didn't take the money out of your pocket right this instant.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  22. icon
    Tgeigs (profile), 3 Jun 2009 @ 6:21am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Mmmm, dead burning bible...

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.